User talk:DrKay

August 2021

Your recent editing history at Monarchy of Pakistan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Peter Ormond 💬 08:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

It is obvious that you are using open proxies on commons to edit images and evade your block there: an image on commons is edited using an open proxyyou insert the image on wikipedia using your account immediately afterwards. This is similar behaviour to the last time you were blocked for sock puppetry when you edited images with one account on commons and then used them on wikipedia using your other accounts: [1].

The same trick of editing through open proxies is being used as part of a campaign of harassment against me on commons: [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and metawiki: [9][10][11].

Note the similarities: one of your known sock puppets votes "keep" on a deletion discussion I started on a file uploaded by your sock puppet: [12]. Your sock puppet is then blocked and shortly afterwards a succession of open proxies disrupts the deletion discussion: [13][14][15]

You upload an image: [16]. Open proxy reverts change to the license: [17]. Note also similarities here: [18][19][20][21][22][23].

I suggest you look to your own behavior. DrKay (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Those IPs are not me. If you have any complaint, go ask them directly. After my last unblock request, I stopped being on Commons entirely. Whatever images I want to use, I am uploading them here on Wikipedia. Peter Ormond 💬 01:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Previous protestations of innocence[24][25][26] were proven false[27]. Like The Boy Who Cried Wolf, subsequent pleas of innocence are not credible. DrKay (talk) 09:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

And this image, which you think I edited, was already used by me a month earlier. I was just copying the content from the Dominion article to a draft. Whatever happens to that file on Commons, how am I responsible for that?

And you have already confirmed that an IP is a sock of Frontman830, why are you dragging my name into it. All license changes by that IP have been done by him [28][29][30][31] and also he is the one accusing you of harassment [32][33][34]. And all other edits by IPs can be block evasions by him. Note that you were the one who concluded that one of the other IPs who accused you of harassment was again a sock of Frontman830 [35]. Peter Ormond 💬 01:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

And even knowing that the IPs were evasions by Frontman830, you are accusing me of their deeds. I consider this as harassment against me. Peter Ormond 💬 01:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The IP's farcical accusations of harassment by me are so ridiculous anyone can see that they are delusional nonsense. You parroting the accusation by claiming that I am harassing you is yet another piece of evidence linking you to the IPs. Stop harassing me. DrKay (talk) 05:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The pot calling the kettle black. Peter Ormond 💬 05:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your post here is further harassment. I have made it clear to you that your posts here are unwelcome. Do not post here again. DrKay (talk) 05:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Whatever any IP has accused of, I am not responsible for that, you should go and ask them directly. And I am not "parroting their accusations". My accusation is based on the fact that despite knowing that the IP master was Frontman830, you are accusing me of their doings. And please do not have any interaction with me further. You are too unwelcome at my talk page. And do not issue any block warnings at my talk page in the future, without engaging in any meaningful discussion at an article's talk page (as I have mentioned at the top of my talk page). I asked you to not edit war and have a discussion [36], but you didn't listen and continued with your edit warring. If I were doing this, you would have blocked me. And even after edit-war notice, you are bringing an entirely different issue, for majority of which I was not involved. Peter Ormond 💬 06:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I have not posted at your talk page since 11 August, and then it was as an administrator after blocking your most recent sock account. That sock account is confirmed by checkuser to be you. I actually did you a massive favor by not blocking you for sock puppetry.

I have not crawled to a noticeboard to talk about you behind your back. That is what you did: [37]. Despite there being clear instructions to inform editors when raising their edits at a noticeboard. I have not crawled to other editors' user pages to talk about you behind your back. That is what you did: [38]. Replying to an editor on my own talk page is obviously not harassment: the harasser is the editor who continually comes to an editor's talk page (11 times so far today) to constantly post new messages despite being asked not to. If you wish to avoid interaction with me, creating sock puppets, posting at my talk page, and talking about me around wikipedia is not the way to achieve it. DrKay (talk) 06:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

If you don't engage in a proper or meaningful discussion [39][40], then I have to talk about it somewhere. But I accept my mistake of not informing you, which I will do in the future. Peter Ormond 💬 06:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

You are complaining about me not discussing a subject while simultaneously pointing at a discussion about that topic that I started. DrKay (talk) 06:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I am complaining that it wasn't a proper discussion and no consensus was there to merge that article. Peter Ormond 💬 07:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The merge was performed entirely properly. Prior notice was given on the talk page and the article itself and the merge was only performed after no dissent. It was then stable for over 5 years, indicating clear consensus that the articles should be merged. At the time of the merge, the monarchy article was an unsourced duplicate[41]. Your continued attempts to portray clearly sensible and entirely appropriate edits as somehow improper is yet another piece of evidence demonstrating your antagonism against me and yet another attempt by you at harassment. DrKay (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

And your false accusations about the IPs above is also a "piece of evidence demonstrating your antagonism against me" and "attempts by you at harassment". Peter Ormond 💬 07:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

If you wish to have an Wikipedia:Interaction ban, you will have to ask for one at the noticeboard. I will not agree to a voluntary one without a noticeboard discussion. Your continued posts at this page despite my clear requests for you to stop are proof of harassment. Please do not post here again unless you are required to do so by wikipedia policy. DrKay (talk) 07:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Heads up

Someone came on the live help chat and asked how to have you blocked on hi.wikipedia "because this user don't know hindi language so how he can edit hindi language wikipedia".

Just thought you should know that someone's upset with you. DS (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. It is the same editor as Special:Contributions/Allanimationhindi ([42]). The sock puppet investigation page is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibot Research of Reverted Edits/Archive, although the earliest account appears to be Special:Contributions/HARSH BRIJ. DrKay (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice

Please look into GoodDay’s comments here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:George_V#Monarch_of_the_United_Kingdom. He says “this is gonna shock the pants off of you”. I tried multiple times (about 7 times) and they simply ignore me and delete the section on their talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.227.87 (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Personal talk page cleanup for guidance. Users are free to remove most comments from their own talk page. Removal is to be taken as proof that they have read the comment. DrKay (talk) 07:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

I do hope the lad has found another pair of pants. GoodDay (talk) 05:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

In future, perhaps just explain that you've read the comment and are permitted to remove it? DrKay (talk) 07:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Sound advice, but I doubt the IP would've stayed away. GoodDay (talk) 12:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

For what it is worth I have blocked the IP for edit warring and harrassment on GoodDay's userpage. I will leave it to you to judge the severity of the shocking of the pants. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 06:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Freedom of Information Application

Given that the UK allows anyone to file a Freedom of Information request, I will be filing one shortly. I intend on uploading the report to Commons and then using it as a reference on George VI’s titles. Please comment. 59.92.227.87 (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

His titles are public knowledge. Freedom of information requests do not apply to anything already published. DrKay (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Reverts for color issues

Hello! You recently reverted three of my edits (here, here, and here) because they added a hidden category: Articles using Template:Background color with invalid colour combination. This was due to my addition of {{Party stripe}}. The transclusion of that template causes pages to be added to that category, but since there is no actual color contrast issue (there is no text over the colors) it is not an accessibility issue. I don't know how to solve this problem with the template, but there is no need to revert edits that add it. Please let me know if it's okay for me to revert you, and let me know if there is any way to prevent {{Party stripe}} from producing this erroneous error. All the best, WMSR (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

See Template talk:Current U.S. senators#Colors (again). DrKay (talk) 16:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I just replied on that talk page, but suffice it to say, I do not understand how it can be a MOS:ACCESS issue when the party abbreviation is next to each name. WMSR (talk) 23:13, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Armageddon (Arrowverse)

I am not able to edit this because of an IP block range intended for someone else. Could you please remove it? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

On what grounds? I don't see an obvious criterion? DrKay (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

I can't explain this. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

I thought you meant remove the page. DrKay (talk) 11:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Duke of Normandy

I am looking for other sources as well for this title, but if you feel the current source doesn’t match standards, feel free to delete it. Do you like the new sections btw? 59.92.227.87 (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

"principles of divine right or birth"

OK, I'll bite: Why "not a typo" [43]? Are these two different principles then? Yappy2bhere (talk) 22:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

IP vandal

I see you've crossed paths with this one before. Please see today's contributions. Seasider53 (talk) 10:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Anti-social Wikipedia user

This guy: “call-girls-jaipur00” (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) needs a whooping on the ***. Throw him out, please. 59.92.227.87 (talk) 10:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)