Jump to content

User talk:Janiclett: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎September 2021: article talk is preferable.
Warning: Edit warring on Indigenous peoples of the Americas.
Line 26: Line 26:


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Janiclett|your recent contributions]], such as the edit you made to [[:Indigenous peoples of the Americas]], did not appear to be constructive and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]]. You can find information about these at our [[Help:Getting started|welcome page]] which also provides further information about [[Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia|contributing constructively to this encyclopedia]]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your [[User:Janiclett/sandbox|sandbox]] for that. If you have any questions, you may leave a message at article talk to keep the discussion centralized. ''You came and made massive changes to an established article, and then hit "undo" on two established editors of said article, with the [[WP:INCIVIL]] and inaccurate edit summary, "the only dispute here are you." Engage on the talk page before editing further.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> - [[User:CorbieVreccan|<span style="color: #660099;"><strong>CorbieVreccan</strong></span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER|☼]] 22:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Janiclett|your recent contributions]], such as the edit you made to [[:Indigenous peoples of the Americas]], did not appear to be constructive and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]]. You can find information about these at our [[Help:Getting started|welcome page]] which also provides further information about [[Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia|contributing constructively to this encyclopedia]]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your [[User:Janiclett/sandbox|sandbox]] for that. If you have any questions, you may leave a message at article talk to keep the discussion centralized. ''You came and made massive changes to an established article, and then hit "undo" on two established editors of said article, with the [[WP:INCIVIL]] and inaccurate edit summary, "the only dispute here are you." Engage on the talk page before editing further.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> - [[User:CorbieVreccan|<span style="color: #660099;"><strong>CorbieVreccan</strong></span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER|☼]] 22:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] other editors' contributions at [[:Indigenous peoples of the Americas]]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]" and is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[:Talk:Indigenous peoples of the Americas|talk page]].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|lose their editing privileges]] on that page. This isn't done to [[WP:BLOCKP|punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring]]. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> - [[User:CorbieVreccan|<span style="color: #660099;"><strong>CorbieVreccan</strong></span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER|☼]] 22:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:44, 13 September 2021

Janiclett, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Janiclett! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Mesoamerican ballgame

Why are you referencing me in your edit summary for this article? I have had no involvement with this article at all (and I'm neither religious nor Canadian). Colonies Chris (talk) 10:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Indigenous peoples of the Americas, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you have any questions, you may leave a message at article talk to keep the discussion centralized. You came and made massive changes to an established article, and then hit "undo" on two established editors of said article, with the WP:INCIVIL and inaccurate edit summary, "the only dispute here are you." Engage on the talk page before editing further. - CorbieVreccan 22:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Indigenous peoples of the Americas. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - CorbieVreccan 22:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]