User talk:BreakingZews

Welcome!

Hello, BreakingZews, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Feb 2019

I have started a discussion about your activity at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Editor_WP:NOTHERE?. You are welcome to participate. Legacypac (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely prohibited from all pages and edits related to post-1932 American politics, broadly construed. You may appeal this sanction on a showing of constructive editing in other areas to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard after six months.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Black Kite (talk) 00:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

November 2021

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating your topic ban against post-1932 American politics, broadly construed[1]. Further violations of this topic ban will be met with escalating blocks., you have been blocked temporarily from editing. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 01:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

This block is for 2 weeks. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 01:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Left wing bias is destroying Wikipedia

Wikipedia suffers from an extreme partisan bias in American politics. Left wing/Democrat editors are forcing their views on all political subjects, citing left wing sources and banning or labelling right wing sources as "unreliable".(Daily Caller, Daily Wire, Fox News, Breitbart, New York Post, etc, etc). This partisan bias has become so extreme that entire Wikipedia pages are constructed on nothing but left wing lies, like the page about "Trump's Family Separation Policy"... Trump never had any such policy(the "Zero Tolerance Policy" was only about prosecuting those who break the law), and families have been separated on the border under several Presidents, but there are no articles about their "Family Separation Policies". The increase in family separations under Trump was due to a court ruling on the Flores Settlement in 2016, while Obama was still President.

I have tried to create a balance, remove or correct some of the most extreme examples of bias on Wikipedia, and that has resulted in me being blocked from commenting on post-1932 American politics, and now a 2 weeks block for removing the entirely false claim that CNN is known "for its efforts to be nonpartisan". Anyone with a half a brain, who follows American news, knows that CNN is known for highly partisan reporting and opinions on American politics, which often include pure disinformation and conspiracy theories. Claiming that they are "known for its efforts to be nonpartisan" is absurd, and banning me for simply removing that false statement from the article just shows once again how American leftist editors are destroying wikipedia. I am not an American, and strongly disagree with the Republican party on many issues. I'm leaving, so celebrate another victory leftist Wikipedia administrators! Too bad Wikipedia is being ruined by your efforts. BreakingZews (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)