Jump to content

Talk:Rudolf Spanner: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
comment
Line 40: Line 40:
''In Kulesza's opinion, Spanner's activities constitute "one of the darkest pages in the Second World War." He emphasized, however, that—were Spanner alive—it would not be possible to bring charges against him for Nazi crimes, but only, at most, for removing evidence of such crimes by destroying corpses.''
''In Kulesza's opinion, Spanner's activities constitute "one of the darkest pages in the Second World War." He emphasized, however, that—were Spanner alive—it would not be possible to bring charges against him for Nazi crimes, but only, at most, for removing evidence of such crimes by destroying corpses.''
--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 18:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 18:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

So when it comes to Spanner’s activities, the authorities have just washed their hands?

Revision as of 07:18, 7 November 2021

WikiProject iconGermany Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

This article really needs more biographical information about Spanner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchernobog (talkcontribs) 05:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DON'T YOU MENTION PROFESSOR SPANNER'S NATIONALITY?

Why is Spanner's nationality skipped in the article? Didn't he have any? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.127.96.85 (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

whats in soap?

everyone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com

                          thank you

whats in soap?

everyone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com

whats in soap?

everyone has their own story about soap and whats in soap.somepeople needs to know the real story about soap.can someone email me some true facts at l.i.lwest38@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keon jackson (talkcontribs) 07:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two one-sided descriptions

The Polish version of the article cites the results of the investigation by INR as a confirmation that human soap was produced (albeit in small quantities), this version focuses on the alternative theory. Both articles could complement one another. Also, the fact that Spanner was a Nobel-worthy physician is a bad argument against his involvement in scientifically worthless experiments. It wouldn't be the first "great man" to feel they can do as they please with impunity. 89.64.14.110 (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He was not involved in any experiments at all though. Thats the point. That some "soap-experimentation" took place is literally made up. He was just a normal teacher/professor accused to give the "concentration camp soap" myth (which was totally unrelated to Danzig Institute/Spanner) some legs to stand on when it became apparent that it was not true. --Havsjö (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The very same article you are spamming the articles with by "freelance historian" admits that Spanner confessed to making soap out of human corpses.

--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 23:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That human soap is not part of the Holocaust. Nothing criminal is related to Spanners "human soap", which is why he was declared innocent of all accusations and is considered as such by the Polish state --Havsjö (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing criminal is related to Spanners "human soap", which is why he was declared innocent of all accusations and is considered as such by the Polish state Absolutely false:[1] In Kulesza's opinion, Spanner's activities constitute "one of the darkest pages in the Second World War." He emphasized, however, that—were Spanner alive—it would not be possible to bring charges against him for Nazi crimes, but only, at most, for removing evidence of such crimes by destroying corpses. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So when it comes to Spanner’s activities, the authorities have just washed their hands?