User talk:El Sandifer

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6

I archive when I feel like it. Depending on my whim, your comments may or may not be archived. The odds of being archived are inversely proportional to the amount you annoy me. Please do not annoy me.

Shawn Mikula

My apologies to you. This is twice Anthony has taken advantage of my assumption of good faith. I should have been suspicious about his "thank you."

What is the current status of your template to be placed and protected on VfU undeletion requests? Not that it matters since I don't think anyone but Anthony is currently playing this particular game...

Dpbsmith (talk) 15:30, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think we should bring it up at the WP:AN page. RickK 05:38, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

I've brought it up on the mailing list. RickK 05:48, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

VfU

Feh, what do I get for writing 200 words of turning the original complaint on its head? An edit conflict. Thanks a lot :) -- Cyrius|✎ 16:07, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Arbcom / LLR / majority

While I appreciate your concern for the number of people required for a majority on the case, there are still only nine active arbitrators (arbitors?) hearing the case - Nohat is inactive, and Ambi and mav are away. The majority of the nine arbitrators active on the case, then, is five. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 14:31, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)

Apology accepted; it just might be a better idea to ask someone before changing those things when an arbcom page is involved. :) -- Grunt 🇪🇺 15:59, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)

Talk:Winter Soldier Investigation

Get involved, if you wish. I am at a state where I'm uncertain what to do. -- AllyUnion (talk) 15:38, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I've increased two WikiStress levels since unprotecting the articles, by the way. They are still at it on the discussion page. And I have this creepy feeling that someone is watching my contributions. -- AllyUnion (talk) 15:42, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mr Natural

How long is his block supposed to be for? RickK 21:32, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

But isn't he banned from editing medical articles period? RickK 21:37, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

LaRouche

It's very decent of you to apologize. Thank you. You've nothing to reproach yourself over, though; it was very hard for anyone to see the extent of what he was doing, and no one knew about the sockpuppets until recently. Best, SlimVirgin 00:01, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

38.119.107.72

What makes you think that this is "Mr. Treason"? As far as I can tell, his nonsensical posts on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy stem from a dispute over French legislation on cult abuses, a subject in which Treason never showed the slightest hint of interest. The IP belongs to PSINet, which Treason never used. I've unblocked it. —Charles P. ^(Mirv) 01:17, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

VfD on Jewish ethnocentralism

The logs are such a mess. See Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Jewish_ethnocentrism/Logs -- AllyUnion (talk) 22:13, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Are you around?

If so, please could you come to #en.wikipedia for a moment? I'd like to discuss Anthony. Thanks -- sannse (talk) 21:04, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

OK, thanks - sannse (talk) 21:22, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

WP:VIP

Um... you were listed at WP:VIP by a User:John Gohde -- AllyUnion (talk) 16:32, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration request against Xed

I've abstained for the moment waiting on evidence with the request (though a sub-page like ChrisO did with WikiUser is also suitable) - David Gerard 20:09, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This matter has been accepted and is at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Xed. Evidence to Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Xed/Evidence. It is uncertain whether or not the offlist email can be considered as evidence in this matter, a ruling on that will be necessary. Fred Bauder 14:49, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

User:John-1107

You are going to have to redo your block I removed it accidently when I removed my 30 min block (don't ask). I would suggest that first you read what is going on at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR though.Geni 02:16, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

A very big thank you, Snowspinner, for your contribution to sorting out the LaRouche problem. SlimVirgin 05:12, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

WP:POINT

I have notieced that your RVs and edit summaries are violating the non-guideline:WP:POINT. Please stop them immediately! -- John Gohde 05:29, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please explain how. Snowspinner 06:18, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Also, please STOP stalking my edits. You are not following any list, you are following my edits. If you persist in deleting THE infobox in the same edit that you have added categories: TOUGH! I will persist in reverting your edits. Your last edit of natural health deleted THE infobox despite the fact that your categories were still intact as you last left them. Therefore, I suggest that your re-read Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series_boxes. You wrote most of it, and its failure to mention infoboxes says that that categories and infoboxes are not redundant because they share absolutely nothing in common. The really funny part is that you forgot to delete a few of my infoboxes, despite your addition of more dumb categories. -- John Gohde 13:18, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

As I have said previously, I do not object to the infobox because of the categories, lists, and series boxes policy. I object because it is not an infobox, but rather an attempt to make your categories shinier and more special than everybody else's. Snowspinner 13:21, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

I am not interested in your inability to function by the rules. I follow the rules. And, your rules are not Wikipedia:Categories, infoboxes, lists, and series_boxes. They are Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series_boxes. Ergo, any infobox that follows the rules stays, despite your problems. Have you read any of the articles on pyschology, shrinks, or perhaps stress counciling? I recommended strongly that you take a 2 year leave of absence. -- John Gohde 14:34, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The rules do not comprise an exhaustive list of bad ideas. Snowspinner 17:15, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

User:Anthony DiPierro/Shawn Mikula

I have restored the page for the purpose that it can be reviewed for Arbritration. Please do not delete it until the matter of Arbritration is resolved. Thank you. -- AllyUnion (talk) 14:08, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I'm glad you're seeking further sanction on this issue. Please be sure that the arbitration committee sees the text of the undeletion discussion, because his shady "explanations" go a great length towards showing his lack of good faith (particularly his patently false claim that it was "completely different"). I think the only solution to his conduct is to permanently block him from editing in the wikipedia namespace. Postdlf 23:09, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

IRC

I've taken off Netoholic's ban on #Wikipedia. I feel (after sleeping and calming down) that it's right to put this down to a misunderstanding -- sannse (talk) 11:44, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Cage Match

It's more along the lines of not disrupting wikipedia for the sake of your own petty battles. You took away his precious template and broke his links, he got pissy and put a TFD notice on a popular template. I personally think that the changes you made to the Alternative medicine project could have been made with more notice and consensus, to avoid antagonizing people, but he reacted immaturely, and the end result was something that could have been settled much more quickly and simply with a couple of folding chairs and a steel cage. Night Gyr 18:07, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Try to come to grips with your HOMOSEXUALITY, as long as you are young. RickK and I are trying too!

-- Rhobite 19:37, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)