Talk:Sanford Underground Research Facility: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F - "Geographic coordinates" |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:ammo|ammo]] ([[User talk:ammo|talk]]) 10:01, 6 May UTC) <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F|2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F]] ([[User talk:2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F|talk]]) 02:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
[[User:ammo|ammo]] ([[User talk:ammo|talk]]) 10:01, 6 May UTC) <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F|2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F]] ([[User talk:2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F|talk]]) 02:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Well …how’s about “ Grammar and Style for the Physical Sciences “? == |
|||
Fixed grammar: we don’t definitively deprecate contractions. But this “they’ll” is too clumsy and vague to merit positive mention of any arguable exceptions to the anti-cont’n g-line. And I don’t have time or attention for the mockery that Swift or Pope might have offered. And the detailing of offenses couldn’t compete with the elegant specimen available via a DIFF query. Have a HD. <br>—20:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)<br> |
Revision as of 20:49, 19 March 2022
![]() | South Dakota Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Physics Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Geographic coordinates
Please add geographic coordinates as we do with all sites. Thanks.
ammo (talk) 10:01, 6 May UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4100:2E00:996:48FC:C4E8:759F (talk) 02:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Well …how’s about “ Grammar and Style for the Physical Sciences “?
Fixed grammar: we don’t definitively deprecate contractions. But this “they’ll” is too clumsy and vague to merit positive mention of any arguable exceptions to the anti-cont’n g-line. And I don’t have time or attention for the mockery that Swift or Pope might have offered. And the detailing of offenses couldn’t compete with the elegant specimen available via a DIFF query. Have a HD.
—20:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)