Jump to content

User talk:Bbb23: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Bbb23/Archive 56) (bot
Line 49: Line 49:
:Globally locked while I was eating lunch.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23#top|talk]]) 21:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
:Globally locked while I was eating lunch.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23#top|talk]]) 21:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
::I see. :D [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 21:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
::I see. :D [[User:Kante4|Kante4]] ([[User talk:Kante4|talk]]) 21:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

== Thank you for your feedback ==

Hi, I wanted to thank you for the message on my talk page. As someone who is just starting out to edit and contribute to Wikipedia, I realize that there is a lot that I need to learn. I spent the weekend reading up on how I can meaningfully contribute and make edits which aren't disruptive. I also intend to comply with Wikipedia's rules regarding paid editing. I will look forward to engaging with you and other moderators to make my presence on Wikipedia more constructive, positive and meaningful. Thank you.

~~

Revision as of 17:55, 28 March 2022


Conversation off ANEW

Why did you move the real conversation about an ANEW out of the thread and onto a third party's Talk page without informing anyone else? Invasive Spices (talk) 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Question about a block

Hi Bbb23. I've had your block of User:Adrianmn1110 brought to my attention, and I'd like to ask you to expand on your reasoning. At present, I'm not seeing any egregious personal attacks or any evidence of harassment from this account. I'd appreciate a bit more information please. Either here, or by email. WormTT(talk) 16:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is anything I can add that you have not already seen on the user's Talk page. If you don't think that the user's pursuit of Scottywong, raised by EvergreenFir, and subsequent heavy-handed snark (worse in my view than directly calling Scotty names) constitutes personal attacks, I'm at a loss as to what else I can say.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I was keeping an eye on that account for being a likely sockpuppet and NOTHERE after their edits on RationalWiki. The personal attacks, imo, just strengthened the NOTHERE evidence. Just my ¥2. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that there may well be sufficient evidence for an indefinite block, but simply marking it as "personal attacks" at the level of commentary does nothing for those admins reviewing the situation. I appreciate the views given. Thanks. WormTT(talk) 16:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Scottywong lazily accusing an editor of being a sockpuppet, with no intention of going to SPI, is far from exemplary behavior, from an admin no less. Adrianmn1110 responding with the "heavy-handed snark" would never catch more than a warning if it came from an experienced user. Half of ANI would probably say the incivility was somewhat justified. And yet Adrianmn1110 is indef-blocked with no prior warnings. Double standards. the user's pursuit All I see is a single edit to Scottywong's talk page, and it's not a personal attack. That edit surely should not factor into your blocking decision. Bbb23, Wikipedia will not collapse if we allow newish users more time to correct their behavior before rushing to block. And I think the community conveniently ignores enforcing WP:NPA/WP:CIVILITY policy when some "good" user is caught being incivil to some "bad"/incompetent user who "deserved" it. If we're going to harshly enforce those policies against new users, then it should be the same for old users. Modulus12 (talk) 04:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah

He came for advice on IRC, so I gave it to him. He has not acknowledged the UPE either, but I can feel it. If this turns in to check user block, it will be even better. For that matter, he's not even made a meaningful pass at the proposed conditions. I spent over an hour on IRC, and so far he has not come close. --Deepfriedokra (talk)00:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted article: American Real Estate Society

Hi,

Just noticed you speedily deleted the article I created about the American Real Estate Society. Just wanted to get some clarification, I looked up their journals and I can provide more examples of ARES journals being cited by publications like PolitiFact, WSJ, etc. Also a few examples of people receiving the awards ARES issues if that helps. Does this help with citations/notability? I can also take another shot at maintaining a neutral tone throughout the article, I read that the deleting administrator can help get the text of an article back and if you're willing to share that with me I'd be more than happy to keep working on this article.

Thanks for clarifying! Would love another shot at getting this article up and running. Will respond after the weekend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuzukiEsteem1998 (talkcontribs) 22:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a block

Hi Bbb23. I've had your block of User:MVDGC brought to my attention, But User:MVDGC is continuously rolling back my edits. So, what can i do ? Thank you. MT731 (talk) 07:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MT731: Until just now when I blocked them as a sock, I've never blocked MVDGC, so what block are you referring to? --Bbb23 (talk) 12:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charli

Hello, looks like him Sport4455 (talk · contribs). If you don't mind. Kante4 (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Globally locked while I was eating lunch.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see. :D Kante4 (talk) 21:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback

Hi, I wanted to thank you for the message on my talk page. As someone who is just starting out to edit and contribute to Wikipedia, I realize that there is a lot that I need to learn. I spent the weekend reading up on how I can meaningfully contribute and make edits which aren't disruptive. I also intend to comply with Wikipedia's rules regarding paid editing. I will look forward to engaging with you and other moderators to make my presence on Wikipedia more constructive, positive and meaningful. Thank you.

~~