User talk:RoBri

Welcome, RoBri!

Hello, RoBri, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

  The five pillars of Wikipedia

  How to edit a page

  Help pages

  Tutorial

  How to write a great article

  Manual of Style

  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

➨ ЯEDVERS 10:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

September 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan Schmid, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GiantSnowman 10:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Uh, sorry. I wanted to replace the passage, but removed it instead by accident. --Roger (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RoBri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RoBri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RoBri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

Hi RoBri,

thank you very much for the report at WP:AIV.

I'm concerned about the liberal usage of the word "vandalism" to describe the behavior of a disagreeing user. Vandalism is intentional, malicious disruption. Even if someone's reverts are disruptive and/or edit warring, the term "vandalism" is unlikely to be appropriate. The disagreeing user tries to improve the encyclopedia too, and personal attacks make it hard to find a consensus.

Regarding the "global ban", that does not seem to be a productive idea; neither Stewards nor the larger community at Meta are likely to intervene in content disputes.

I will remove the report for now; see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for advice and create a report at the edit warring noticeboard if really necessary. As it requires multiple people to edit war, please consider discussing instead of reverting again. The essay WP:DISCFAIL might be useful.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

RoBri, this type of edit warring is not "vandalism". Please don't describe it as such. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

ToBeFree, I used German WP's terminology, which apparantly is not compatible. Got it. --Roger (talk) 08:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

RoBri, I may be unnecessarily insistent, but "Ebenfalls nicht um Vandalismus handelt es sich bei Edit-Wars wegen sachlicher Differenzen". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Charli

Heyho, was ist eigentlich das Problem mit dem User. Hab das nur so ein bisschen verfolgt in der de.wikipedia. Er darf nix mehr machen, auch "gute" edits? Weiss nicht ob "77.183.122.236" auch eine IP davon ist, weil selbe edits? Aber will keinen beschuldigen, daher die vorsichtige Frage. Kante4 (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Hiya, das ist kurz zusammengefasst in de:Benutzer:RoBri/Charli. Er hat zu oft Grenzen überschritten, sodass eine Prüfung seiner Edits nicht mehr lohnt. Global ist er mit allen bekannten Sockpuppets gesperrt, WP:RBI ist angezeigt. Cheers, --Roger (talk) 19:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC) ...in der Tat war 77.183.122.236 (talk · contribs) derjenige welcher. Für Maßnahmen wohl zu spät. --Roger (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Ich glaube er editiert dann die Artikel wie die Fussball ligen und auch Handball anscheinend. Was ja vollkommen in Ordnung wäre aber wenn er geblockt ist überall halt nicht. Kante4 (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Taucht immer wieder mit neuen IP's auf, was kann man tun (will auch niemand beschuldigen der damit nix zu tun hat)? Revidiert edits nur um sie danach selber zu tun. "78.54.144.207" die neueste, "nette" Art mit anderen Usern zu reden. Is ja echt nervig, aber weggehen wird er nicht denke ich mal... Kante4 (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

User_talk:Deancarmeli#Medal_Table zeigt, dass er generell überfordert ist. Wortlos revertieren (RBI, s.o.), bei Penetranz melden. Das ist ein sehr kleines Licht. Grüße, --Roger (talk) 21:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Iliassport032021 (talk · contribs) ist der nächste. Kann ich den in deine Liste hinzufügen auf de.wp und den zuständigen Admin Schniggendiller markieren oder wie läuft das ab? Und hört das jemals auf? Kante4 (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Ja, nur zu. Schniggendiller ist globaler Stewart und hat die Site offenbar unter Beobachtung. Roger (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Dann werd ich das tun und ihn dann einfach in der edit zusammenfassung verlinken so wie ich es bei dir einmal gesehen habe. Schwieriger ist was gegen IPs zu unternehmen wohl... Kante4 (talk) 17:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Note...

... 2003:e8:cf04:9700::/56 (talk · contribs) --Roger (talk) 13:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Frank Turek

Auf deutsch: Ich habe eine Diskussion über die Einbindung der besagten Kategorie begonnen und meine Argumente dargestellt. Beteilige dich daran. Erkläre mir, WAS soll ich noch tun, damit „consensus“ erzielt wird?!—Koelnfan (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Lass es einfach dauerhaft, Kategorien zu "bearbeiten". --Roger (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC) ...auch ausgeloggt nicht. --Roger (talk) 20:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Du kannst mir nichts verbieten. Komm von deinem hohen Ross runter und antworte lieber auf Fragen und/oder beteilige dich an Diskussionen, anstatt Dinge zu unterstellen und Editors zu vergraulen.—Koelnfan (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Mal im Ernst: Wieso hast du die Kategorie wieder entfernt?—Koelnfan (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Siehe die zahlreichen Hinweise auf deinen Diskseiten hier und in deWP. Hier Ende. --Roger (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Geh doch bitte nur ein einziges Mal konkret auf eine Frage ein, anstatt immer nur auf irgendwas zu verweisen. Ist das zu viel verlangt?—Koelnfan (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, wenn ich nerve, aber ich meine das wirklich ernst. Der Typ, um den es hier geht, erwähnt in jedem seiner Vorträge wie schlecht und falsch Homosexualität sei und bezeichnet es als Gefühl, welches man nicht haben sollte. So wie Gier, Wut, Rache etc. Zu finden sind diese Inhalte auf seinem YT-Kanal „CrossExamined“. Zudem (und das ist mein größtes Argument), hat er ein Buch geschrieben, welches den Titel „…How Same-sex Marriage Hurts Everyone“ trägt. Ein Buch! Gegen gleichgeschlechtliche Paare! Ich frage ernsthaft, was um alles in der Welt muss noch geschehen, damit auch laut deiner Meinung die Aufnahme in die Kategorie Anti-same-sex-marriage activists legitimiert ist? Unter dieser Kategorie finden sich zahlreiche Geistliche, die sich mal dazu geäußert haben und wegen der Religion halt dagegen sind. Siehe André Vingt-Trois, Juan Sandoval Íñiguez, Ghenadie Valuța & Robert Sarah. Zudem Politiker/Unternehmer wie Ignacio Urrutia, Željka Markić und Cher Wang, die halt „einfach nur“ gegen diese Ehe sind und sich irgendwann mal geäußert haben. Turek hat ein ganzes Buch (!) dagegen geschrieben und nicht nur was gesagt… Ich verstehe nicht, warum die genannten Personen und noch einige Fernseh-Prediger mit sehr ähnlichem Mindset die Kriterien erfüllen und Turek nicht.—Koelnfan (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Naja, aber ich will unterm Strich betonen, dass ich auch keinen Stress will und rudere jetzt etwas zurück. Mich bewegen manche Themen einfach emotional. Einen guten Abend dir! :) —Koelnfan (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)