Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Change Network: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
redirect |
→Leading Change Network: Reply |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::I stated I have no objection to redirecting, provided we get consensus so we don't have to keep going through this, obviously. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color:#E52B50;font-size:11px">PRAXIDICAE💕</span>]] 15:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC) |
::I stated I have no objection to redirecting, provided we get consensus so we don't have to keep going through this, obviously. [[User:Praxidicae|<span style="color:#E52B50;font-size:11px">PRAXIDICAE💕</span>]] 15:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I already nominated this article once for speedy deletion (yesterday) as promotion, and it was quickly deleted. I see it is now back. The tone is still completely wrong, and still reeks of an advert. Redirect to Ganz until something less promotional can be written. [[User:A loose necktie|A loose necktie]] ([[User talk:A loose necktie|talk]]) 11:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' I already nominated this article once for speedy deletion (yesterday) as promotion, and it was quickly deleted. I see it is now back. The tone is still completely wrong, and still reeks of an advert. Redirect to Ganz until something less promotional can be written. [[User:A loose necktie|A loose necktie]] ([[User talk:A loose necktie|talk]]) 11:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
*:Is is possible to receive more detailed feedback as to how to make the tone right? Thank you [[Special:Contributions/82.222.98.255|82.222.98.255]] ([[User talk:82.222.98.255|talk]]) 17:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:35, 14 May 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Leading Change Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I removed the SPEEDY tag because it was contested. I still believe that delete is in order for violation of WP:ADV and promotion, but we should discuss it as a group and come to consensus. Paul McDonald (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Paul McDonald (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: both the nominator and Praxidicae (talk · contribs) nominated this article at exactly the same time, causing two nominations to open at once. I've tagged the second nom for G6 and ask Praxidicae to participate here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- delete I fail to see how LCN is notable on it's own, this is nothing more than what appears to be PR but I can't find any meaningful in depth coverage and all that appears to be in the article are stories about Ganz or speaking roles/appearances that mention LCN with nothing truly independent. No objection to redirecting to Ganz PRAXIDICAE💕 17:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of copying the previous comment from the second nomination. This should be considered basic cleanup only.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, CSD could well have been granted for WP:ADV. Salvage option would be redirect to Ganz. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 18:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- I stated I have no objection to redirecting, provided we get consensus so we don't have to keep going through this, obviously. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I already nominated this article once for speedy deletion (yesterday) as promotion, and it was quickly deleted. I see it is now back. The tone is still completely wrong, and still reeks of an advert. Redirect to Ganz until something less promotional can be written. A loose necktie (talk) 11:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Is is possible to receive more detailed feedback as to how to make the tone right? Thank you 82.222.98.255 (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)