Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jeuno (talk | contribs)
Line 25: Line 25:
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' The federal election is coming tomorrow, and there has been IP/unregistered vandalism that has slowly been increasing in frequency in the past few days. By tomorrow, the the vandalism is likely to multiply exponentially if left unprotected since the daily pageviews is basically guaranteed to also significantly increase. I'd suggest to protect the page for at least the next 3 days since the results are unlikely to be finalised by tomorrow. [[User: Jeuno|<span style="color:#28B1FF;">Jeuno</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeuno|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Jeuno|contribs]]) 10:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' The federal election is coming tomorrow, and there has been IP/unregistered vandalism that has slowly been increasing in frequency in the past few days. By tomorrow, the the vandalism is likely to multiply exponentially if left unprotected since the daily pageviews is basically guaranteed to also significantly increase. I'd suggest to protect the page for at least the next 3 days since the results are unlikely to be finalised by tomorrow. [[User: Jeuno|<span style="color:#28B1FF;">Jeuno</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeuno|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Jeuno|contribs]]) 10:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Declined''' – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#coll --> I can see more positive (or at least good-faith) edits from IPs than obvious vandalism among the most recent several days. [[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 12:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Declined''' – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#coll --> I can see more positive (or at least good-faith) edits from IPs than obvious vandalism among the most recent several days. [[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]] 12:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
::Thank you for your response, if the situation does change tomorrow then I'll come back here, but for now I'll just watch the page and remove obvious vandalism since it is still manageable right now. [[User: Jeuno|<span style="color:#28B1FF;">Jeuno</span>]] ([[User talk:Jeuno|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Jeuno|contribs]]) 12:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


=== [[Gwen Stefani]] ===
=== [[Gwen Stefani]] ===

Revision as of 12:37, 20 May 2022

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Reason: Sockpuppetry and vandalism by a group in my neighbourhood. G'dayFellowMinecrafters (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Same as 49.179.42.75. You and your "mates" should stop wasting our time. Favonian (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've also revdel'd the Scott Morrison BLP vio account name and edits/edit summaries, which also featured some homophobic slurs for bad measure. El_C 10:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Fade258 (talk) 10:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: well, which is it? Bangladesh or Sri Lanka? @Fade258 and Lugnuts: courtesy ping. El_C 10:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. I just posted this on the talkpage. Right now, it's Sri Lanka until the Asian Cricket Council say otherwise. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks Lugnuts, I appreciate the prompt reply. El_C 10:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem - and thank you for adding the protection. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El_C Thank you for the ping. I just requested to protect this page because there is an addition of unsourced content by the IP user or someone else where Lugnuts had posted on that respective article talk page regarding this issue. Fade258 (talk) 11:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The federal election is coming tomorrow, and there has been IP/unregistered vandalism that has slowly been increasing in frequency in the past few days. By tomorrow, the the vandalism is likely to multiply exponentially if left unprotected since the daily pageviews is basically guaranteed to also significantly increase. I'd suggest to protect the page for at least the next 3 days since the results are unlikely to be finalised by tomorrow. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 10:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I can see more positive (or at least good-faith) edits from IPs than obvious vandalism among the most recent several days. Jayron32 12:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response, if the situation does change tomorrow then I'll come back here, but for now I'll just watch the page and remove obvious vandalism since it is still manageable right now. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 12:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsourced content and vandalism 88.245.22.171 (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is averaging less than one edit per week. Jayron32 12:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated premature edits, doubtless GF, to denote subject is a city, rather than, as is currently noted, that it is to become one later in the year. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is a borderline case, most of the contested changes are good faith differences in understanding about the timing of the status; plus they are coming from both autoconfirmed accounts and IPs. It's mildly annoying to have to correct this, but the potential for collateral damage seems to outweigh that. Stay vigilant, but I can't see any legitimate policy violations (rather than differences in understanding of sources) that protection would ameliorate. Jayron32 12:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 11:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing widespread bad-faith editing. Maybe some misunderstandings about how to add images or sourcing requirements, but nothing that I would call outright vandalism. Jayron32 12:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jayron32, It wasn't a misunderstandings or something like that, anonymous users are continously adding original research. One user changed it to a deep depression and another user changed it to a tropical storm. I don't know whether you guys will take that as a reason or not Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 12:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 88.245.22.171 (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 12:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the last protection expired, vandalism has continued, usually targeting Amber Heard. --*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 11:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron32 12:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 11:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayron32 12:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 88.245.22.171 (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any vandalism at all. Jayron32 12:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-jumping, block-evading editor keeps adding false information that they are married to this person (the blocked editor also claims to be 16 years old, so, BLP issues aside....). Hopefully a temp protection can finally but the brakes on this. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamra456. Singularity42 (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant diffs: [1], [2], [3]. Singularity42 (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption has been constant during the past few months, but there has also been a significant number of constructive contributions from some IPs. The page gets quite a bit of traffic from established users, so I think PC would work well here. I suggest trying it out for a few months. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 12:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism after his death 88.245.22.171 (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent recurring IP vandalism M16A3NoRecoilHax (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – GRP. EthanGaming7640 12:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]