User talk:Cam5643

Block evasion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cam5643 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

after adding a citation in the following page I´m blocked with no explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbalax ICam5643 (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

An explanation has been provided and appears to be accurate. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you were blocked for evading this block. Note that meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry are both equally blockable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

It´s a lie I added a citation and have been blocked with no explanation. It´s my first account on this website. Once again it´s a lie, you aree welcome to do a WP:SPI.

Given the timing WP:MEATPUPPET applies here, which is also blockable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

This does not apply to my account, I´m new the timimg says nothing about me or my account. Millions of users are on this website daily and at the same time. You argument is not valuable. Cam5643 (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I´m taking this dispute to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents you have no reason to block my account.

I tried to make a request on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard OhNoitsJamie Talk also bloked me on that page

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Cam5643 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. Citation was added OhNoitsJamie Talk deleted it Cam5643 (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. Citation was added OhNoitsJamie Talk deleted it [[User:Cam5643|Cam5643]] ([[User talk:Cam5643#top|talk]]) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. Citation was added OhNoitsJamie Talk deleted it [[User:Cam5643|Cam5643]] ([[User talk:Cam5643#top|talk]]) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. Citation was added OhNoitsJamie Talk deleted it [[User:Cam5643|Cam5643]] ([[User talk:Cam5643#top|talk]]) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

UTRS appeal #58952

is closed. User should make an unblock request here, asking that their appeal be carried to WP:AN. As someone with no idea what's going on, in theory, I'd be happy to do so, but in full sight of the community. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Sequence of events ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FromSenegal This user is blocked for repeatedly making poorly sourced edits, most of which involve removing/replacing well-sourced assertions having to do with removing any references to Gambia as part of a regional origin (2) Immediately after that account is blocked, this account is created and makes a single edit, once again removing Gambia and adding a difference source, the exact type of edit the recently blocked account had done. It was clear this was either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry; a cursory CU check on FromSenegal suggests the latter. If this user is only here to resume the disruptive editing that another user has been blocked for, there's no reason to lift the block. If Cam5643 has other non-disruptive editing interests, I wouldn't oppose an unblock. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

This is my only and first account. I´ve been blocked without a possiblity to request a resolution , the ban did not follow the WP:BAN policies. Cam5643 (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:GAB. You do indeed have path to resolution; address the meatpuppetry detailed above, and describe what other edits you would make if unblocked; hopefully, these edits would not included systematically removing mentions of Gambia from music and culture articles. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I added a citation confirming where the music genre really is from. like I said this is my first account I have nothing to do with the meatpupperty you are accuming this is against Wikipedia policy. If I get unblocked depending on the subject I´m dealing with at the moment I will edit artilces whith citations and hoprefully you will not just delete them out of unprofessionalism. Now if I just edited without any proof I could understand and accept the decision made, but with the citation I gave this is unacceptable from your part. Addititonally this website is meant to be edited by anyone, you can´t tell me what I have to edit or not unless I can´t do give a citation. Cam5643 (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

"Meant to be editing by anyone" doesn't mean everyone can do as they please. The fact that you are blocked from editing at the moment should've made that clear. You're not going to be unblocked if you're only here to edit war about Senegal and Gambia, regardless of what citations you throw around. You've also failed to address why your first edit to Wikipedia happened to be similar to an edit a different user had been blocked for less than an hour earlier. To quote from WP:MEAT: A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I know that editing doesn´t mean you can do as you please. I edit pages where false narrations are written. if I gave a citation that did not include Gambia as a country where the music genre is from this doesn't mean I'm targeting a specific country. There are a number of members on this website who are only interested in a certain subject or demographic. they only edit articles about subject of they are interested in. I'm not the only one.first edit happened to be that article because I was searching something on a search engine and came to this pageCam5643 (talk) 22:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)