User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:51, 4 June 2022

Welcome to my talk page.

Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
- If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
- If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments.

Thank you, and happy editing!

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing C.Fred a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter 3 is going to happen just unknown release date

Hey C.Fred check there discord it’s going to happen just they don’t know when

https://discord.gg/poppyplaytime

Liam Stoneback YTLiamStoneback (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "discord isn't reliable" is unclear? You're just forum shopping now and I suggest you stop. Also sorry C. Fred, but they're popping up all over my WL. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YTLiamStoneback: Arguably, any mention of chapter 3 should be removed without a reliable source. I was generous to leave the alleged date in with no reference. —C.Fred (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You guys don’t understand THE DEVELOPERS THEMSELVES ARE IN THAT SERVER and they said that chapter 3 is going to happen they don’t know the if the release is going to be early 2023 and if you check mob games yt the exact sma e discord server is in the description of there yt videos — Preceding unsigned comment added by YTLiamStoneback (talk • contribs) 10:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YTLiamStoneback: How can we verify that the developers are in that server and that they're the ones who made the statement? —C.Fred (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about you join the server and see for yourself YTLiamStoneback (talk) 23:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YTLiamStoneback: Cost-benefit. I don't see where I will get any information on the server that will justify registering, since I don't see what I could get as a member of the server that would be published and establish the claims. —C.Fred (talk) 03:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly Help to save the article Atul Kumar Sharma (Producer)

Kindly help to save the article about Atul Kumar Sharma(Proeucer). Its a genuine article, with all the geuine supporting links. Few Editors on wikipedia without even checking just places deletion tag, It would be great help. Kindly protect the page of you can. I want to make genuine contributions to wikipedia and its not a promotional act or promotional article. 103.93.192.230 (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not only were the concerns from the AfD not addressed, but the article was also apparently created by a user who is evading their block. —C.Fred (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To your notice

Dear Admin, you removed a personal attack post on talk page of Narayani Sena article, similar comments are put up by IPs here [[1]], this is top level harrassment going on for just doing normal editing. I would request you for the removal of the same. Thanks RS6784 (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RS6784: Thanks for the heads up. That's an older message, but I've cleaned up that thread as well. —C.Fred (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sock?

Hi C.Fred, please check User:Mammaacademia against User:Suziesaltos, thanks. Cheers, Achim55 (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Achim55: Good catch! Blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Hello, C.Fred,

I was following an edit made to a category and came across the user talk page of ToasyCake100. I see a lot of user talk pages of new editors every day but I don't think I've ever seen one with so many notices about incorrect information for images or problems with copyright. I'm really not an expert on files or copyright regulation but I saw you left a notice there for them. I just wonder if there are ongoing problems and more needs to be said to them or if this is a issue that has been addressed. I trust your judgment on this but I thought I'd ask. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Thank you for asking. I think there is an issue with editor attitude that's starting to reveal itself. They reverted the edit, but this comment speaks of an unwillingness to follow guidelines.

I don't think they do bad work, but it's incomplete work, since they haven't been adding license information–especially since they're adding images of corporate logos, which are almost always copyright and non-free. (There are a few exceptions where the logos are simple shapes and type, so simple that they can't be copyrighted.) Images are a complex area, and while it's good for new editors to want to jump in and help, it's a tricky area, even for seasoned editors. I wonder how they would respond to a message with an offer to help guide them as an editor and teach them how to do things right, since most of the messages on their talk page have been things they've done wrong. —C.Fred (talk) 10:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's birth name

I've modified his birth name, because I've found his birth certificate and it's a very reliable source. Cezar Teodosiu (talk) 17:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cezar Teodosiu: How do we know the blog is reliable? —C.Fred (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Administrator changes

Tamzin

Barek • Darkwind • Geometry guy • ProcseeBot • RoyBoy • Sean Whitton • Valereee • Visorstuff • WAvegetarian

Sn0wflake → VersedFenrir

CheckUser changes

Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.

Technical news

Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration

Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

For the inspired use of the word retconned. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morocco national team

Hello! On june 3, the user https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/196.206.141.78 removed valid information about the national team. If you don’t mind returning the information back. apparently he edited more than once, removing information for example pre independence period. if you see the page before June 2 u can notice everything that went missing. he also deleted top goal scorer record and lots of informatoion. pls check the page before June 1 to notice all the missing. and apologize for all the trouble 88.201.84.224 (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Magyaráb people

I am trying to fix this garbage. It's not real. It never was. I wanted to delete it, Spinningspark removed the deletion mark. You reverted my edit despite it merely stated facts. How can anyone remove garbage from this website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D08:5380:CAD:8801:9561:D586:3321 (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must provide reliable sources to back up the origin story you allege for the Magyarab people. —C.Fred (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But I did. I translated the summary of the 2007 expedition which was already linked from the article, mind you. What else do you need? How can someone prove the nonexistence of something...? 2604:3D08:5380:CAD:8801:9561:D586:3321 (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit did not make clear what your source was.

As far as proving the non-existing of something, if reliable sources say it exists, then you have to find counter-sources to say it doesn't, or otherwise find a way to challenge the sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified what the expedition was. 2604:3D08:5380:CAD:8801:9561:D586:3321 (talk) 21:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 140: / Line 140: @@
 :::Your edit did not make clear what your source was.
 :::As far as proving the non-existing of something, if reliable sources say it exists, then you have to find counter-sources to say it doesn't, or otherwise find a way to challenge the sources. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 21:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
+::::Clarified what the expedition was. [[Special:Contributions/2604:3D08:5380:CAD:8801:9561:D586:3321|2604:3D08:5380:CAD:8801:9561:D586:3321]] ([[User talk:2604:3D08:5380:CAD:8801:9561:D586:3321|talk]]) 21:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)