Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelogica: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:27, 29 June 2022

Nelogica

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Brochure article. scope_creep^Talk 12:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I wrote the page. It seems to me that it meets the primary criteria in WP:NCORP: there is substantial coverage of the subject (whole articles about it, sources are cited in the page, e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]) in multiple reliable sources completely independent of the subject and of each other, such as Zero Hora, Exame, O Globo and Endeavor_(non-profit) (see aforementioned links). The coverage spans at least 4 years (2019-2022). Seems enough? Saturnalia0 (talk) 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That coverage is completely routine and fails various parts of WP:NCORP. For example the first ref is an interviews, failing WP:SIRS and WP:ORGIND. The refs are woeful for this startup. It is not coverage, its routine press-release fodder. The rest are the same including the non-rs blog. scope_creep^Talk 20:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean. The first link is not an interview, although it contains interview questions. The other links are not press releases by the subject of the article, they are independent articles on national newspapers and national magazines. The "blog" one is a specialized column in a newspaper, if that doesn't count well there are various other articles... Saturnalia0 (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 {{Comment}} I wrote the page. It seems to me that it meets the primary criteria in [[WP:NCORP]]: there is substantial coverage of the subject (whole articles about it, sources are cited in the page, e.g. [https://endeavor.org.br/historia-de-empreendedores/um-exemplo-para-acreditar-por-que-a-nelogica-pode-se-tornar-uma-das-primeiras-fintechs-brasileiras-de-impacto-global/] [https://braziljournal.com/exclusivo-nelogica-avaliada-em-r-29-bilhoes-em-rodada-com-crescera-e-vulcan/] [https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/marta-sfredo/noticia/2019/06/comecaremos-operacao-nos-eua-e-talvez-na-europa-ainda-neste-ano-diz-ceo-da-nelogica-cjxdp23vz033s01o9cfq78pah.html] [https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/marta-sfredo/noticia/2020/05/em-plena-pandemia-empresa-gaucha-ganha-40-mais-clientes-e-precisa-preencher-150-vagas-para-ontem-ckah5a7p000jp015nak7k2amj.html] [https://exame.com/pme/com-aporte-de-r-550-milhoes-nelogica-e-avaliada-em-r-29-bilhoes/] [https://blogs.oglobo.globo.com/capital/post/aquisicao-na-tela-do-day-trader-nelogica-compra-comdinheiro-de-paschoarelli.html]) in multiple reliable sources completely independent of the subject and of each other, such as [[Zero Hora]], [[Exame]], [[O Globo]] and [[Endeavor_(non-profit)]] (see aforementioned links). The coverage spans at least 4 years (2019-2022). Seems enough? [[User:Saturnalia0|Saturnalia0]] ([[User talk:Saturnalia0|talk]]) 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 ::That coverage is completely routine and fails various parts of [[WP:NCORP]]. For example the first ref is an interviews, failing [[WP:SIRS]] and [[WP:ORGIND]]. The refs are woeful for this startup. It is not coverage, its routine press-release fodder. The rest are the same including the non-rs blog.  '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 20:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
+::: Not sure what you mean. The first link is not an interview, although it contains interview questions. The other links are not press releases by the subject of the article, they are independent articles on national newspapers and national magazines. The "blog" one is a specialized column in a newspaper, if that doesn't count well there are various other articles... [[User:Saturnalia0|Saturnalia0]] ([[User talk:Saturnalia0|talk]]) 23:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)