Talk:Breaking the Ice (Star Trek: Enterprise): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:51, 1 July 2022

Television: Episode coverage C‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that a picture be added to this article.

Notability

If you can't understand the tags added to this article mean, then quite simply, it's comprised of nothing that couldn't be summarised in a simple article on this particular season of the show. WikiuserNI (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason reason to be rude. Collaborative editing not only requires the assumption of good faith, it also requires a minimal amount of civility. The question isn't whether editors 'understand' what a tag means, the question ,in relation to each specific tag, is 'What do you think should be done to improve the article?' If you don't think the article can or should be improved you should nominate it for deletion, rather than simply tag it. Dlabtot (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This Emmy nominated episode was always notable, even if for a long time the the article may have consisted of little more than a plot summary, but it has been substantially improved since then. -- 109.79.172.124 (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The VFX process for this episode was mentioned in Star Trek Magazine https://archive.org/details/startrekmagazine03unse_10/page/66/mode/2up -- 109.76.195.193 (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 : There's no reason reason to be rude. Collaborative editing not only requires [[WP:AGF|the assumption of good faith]], it also requires a minimal amount of [[WP:CIVILITY|civility]]. The question isn't whether editors 'understand' what a tag means, the question ,in relation to each specific tag, is 'What do you think should be done to improve the article?'   If you don't think the article can or should be improved you should nominate it for deletion, rather than simply tag it. [[User:Dlabtot|Dlabtot]] ([[User talk:Dlabtot|talk]]) 17:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 :: This Emmy nominated episode was always notable, even if for a long time the the article may have consisted of little more than a plot summary, but it has been substantially improved since then. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.79.172.124|109.79.172.124]] ([[User talk:109.79.172.124|talk]]) 15:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
+The VFX process for this episode was mentioned in Star Trek Magazine https://archive.org/details/startrekmagazine03unse_10/page/66/mode/2up -- [[Special:Contributions/109.76.195.193|109.76.195.193]] ([[User talk:109.76.195.193|talk]]) 02:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)