Jump to content

Talk:Elyse Myers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adding WikiProject tags using AfC-submit-wizard
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{BLP}}
{{BLP}}

== On draft and promotional nature ==

I have started 102 articles in the main space over the course of 18 years. I wrote most of the good article [[SA-500D]], so I have an idea of how things are to be written. This article is not "finished" any more than its subject is. The reliable secondary source coverage of this subject (at least when I researched it a few weeks ago) is sparse and uncritical, so it's hard to avoid "promotional tone." I removed a few links to social media sites, but those seem relevant for a social media influencer. The WP draft flow is new for me, because it wasn't invented when I started, and I learned the rules before then. I'm a bit confused about how the article could be "not ready for main space" or what could be done with it in the absence of more source material, but the amount of material available suggests it's a worthy topic for inclusion. I invite concrete and actionable suggestions. -- [[User:Ke4roh|ke4roh]] ([[User talk:Ke4roh|talk]]) 03:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:14, 5 July 2022

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

On draft and promotional nature

I have started 102 articles in the main space over the course of 18 years. I wrote most of the good article SA-500D, so I have an idea of how things are to be written. This article is not "finished" any more than its subject is. The reliable secondary source coverage of this subject (at least when I researched it a few weeks ago) is sparse and uncritical, so it's hard to avoid "promotional tone." I removed a few links to social media sites, but those seem relevant for a social media influencer. The WP draft flow is new for me, because it wasn't invented when I started, and I learned the rules before then. I'm a bit confused about how the article could be "not ready for main space" or what could be done with it in the absence of more source material, but the amount of material available suggests it's a worthy topic for inclusion. I invite concrete and actionable suggestions. -- ke4roh (talk) 03:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]