Talk:Elyse Myers: Difference between revisions
Adding WikiProject tags using AfC-submit-wizard |
→On draft and promotional nature: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
||
{{BLP}} |
{{BLP}} |
||
== On draft and promotional nature == |
|||
I have started 102 articles in the main space over the course of 18 years. I wrote most of the good article [[SA-500D]], so I have an idea of how things are to be written. This article is not "finished" any more than its subject is. The reliable secondary source coverage of this subject (at least when I researched it a few weeks ago) is sparse and uncritical, so it's hard to avoid "promotional tone." I removed a few links to social media sites, but those seem relevant for a social media influencer. The WP draft flow is new for me, because it wasn't invented when I started, and I learned the rules before then. I'm a bit confused about how the article could be "not ready for main space" or what could be done with it in the absence of more source material, but the amount of material available suggests it's a worthy topic for inclusion. I invite concrete and actionable suggestions. -- [[User:Ke4roh|ke4roh]] ([[User talk:Ke4roh|talk]]) 03:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:14, 5 July 2022
![]() | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
On draft and promotional nature
I have started 102 articles in the main space over the course of 18 years. I wrote most of the good article SA-500D, so I have an idea of how things are to be written. This article is not "finished" any more than its subject is. The reliable secondary source coverage of this subject (at least when I researched it a few weeks ago) is sparse and uncritical, so it's hard to avoid "promotional tone." I removed a few links to social media sites, but those seem relevant for a social media influencer. The WP draft flow is new for me, because it wasn't invented when I started, and I learned the rules before then. I'm a bit confused about how the article could be "not ready for main space" or what could be done with it in the absence of more source material, but the amount of material available suggests it's a worthy topic for inclusion. I invite concrete and actionable suggestions. -- ke4roh (talk) 03:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)