Jump to content

Talk:LOL: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:LOL/Archive 4) (bot
Line 41: Line 41:


Cat [[Special:Contributions/196.191.152.150|196.191.152.150]] ([[User talk:196.191.152.150|talk]]) 09:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Cat [[Special:Contributions/196.191.152.150|196.191.152.150]] ([[User talk:196.191.152.150|talk]]) 09:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2022 ==

{{edit semi-protected|LOL|answered=no}}
Add [[:Category:Laughter]] [[Special:Contributions/50.60.27.119|50.60.27.119]] ([[User talk:50.60.27.119|talk]]) 13:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:33, 7 July 2022

WikiProject iconInternet culture B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Unicode 🤣 redirect

The page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%F0%9F%A4%A3&redirect=no redirects to this one, LOL. All my Chrome browser displays is a square box, and it appears to be some 16 bit Unicode that my text editor displays as question marks. Firefox displays it as an emoji. Is that what it should be? Does this LOL page include whatever the redirect is meant to be? Shouldn't an image be added that is accessible to a wider variety of users? -84user (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it appears that this is a bug in Chrome that will not be fixed, according to https://support.google.com/chrome/thread/81608267/emojis-do-not-show-up?hl=en . -84user (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very outdated

Sources are all from the 2000s and doesn't properly cover uses like how "lol" is just a particle representing a casual tone and includes information that is no longer relevant. There's also too much pointless prescriptivism in here. This article doesn't cover modern usage of "lol" at all. useful ref  Nixinova T  C   06:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of Richard Nixon has no reason to be here

Waste of space, offers nothing to the dicussion. If you absoluetly need to have a picture of someone laughing it should be a clinical type picture, not some random famous person. I think it's distracting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:444:C301:6BB0:0:0:0:EAD3 (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 May 2022

its out of date Jacobplayzgaming (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cat

Cat 196.191.152.150 (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2022

Add Category:Laughter 50.60.27.119 (talk) 13:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]