Jump to content

Talk:Ice Cream for Breakfast Day: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 30 - replacing task force templates with the main WP:NY template
Line 27: Line 27:
== Time for an update ==
== Time for an update ==
The references are mostly from 2014 -- there must be something newer out there (yes -- I'll see what I can do too). [[User:Kevink707|Kevink707]] ([[User talk:Kevink707|talk]]) 18:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
The references are mostly from 2014 -- there must be something newer out there (yes -- I'll see what I can do too). [[User:Kevink707|Kevink707]] ([[User talk:Kevink707|talk]]) 18:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

== Needs a rewrite: the tone is like a journalistic article ==

Should sound encyclopaedic and formal. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:61CB:A878:9EFC:DA80|2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:61CB:A878:9EFC:DA80]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:61CB:A878:9EFC:DA80|talk]]) 18:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:34, 14 July 2022

"How People Celebrate" section

Hello. I'm the person who added links to this article for the "Dead-end pages clean up project" and who performed some minor copy editing (e.g. italicizing the names of publications, etc.) to it.

Although I enjoyed the article, I would like to suggest these changes to the section "How People Celebrate":

  • Delete the sentence that begins "The holiday is often explained...". I don't see any value in it;
  • Definitely delete the "Year / Date" table. It will eventually become outdated. Moreover, most people are intelligent enough to look at a calendar and determine the date for the "first Saturday in February" of a particular year. ("most", maybe not "all" )

--LukasMatt (talk) 07:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday?

It is not a holiday, right? At least it does not match the definition in the Holiday article. It could be described as an "observance day".

Cheers! Syced (talk) 10:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Time for an update

The references are mostly from 2014 -- there must be something newer out there (yes -- I'll see what I can do too). Kevink707 (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a rewrite: the tone is like a journalistic article

Should sound encyclopaedic and formal. 2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:61CB:A878:9EFC:DA80 (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]