Jump to content

User talk:Peter coxhead: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Peter coxhead/Archive 28) (bot
Tag: Reverted
→‎Phryma: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 50: Line 50:
:::{{ping|Phacelias}} but it doesn't say that the English name is "Cartman's buttercup", so it's (mild) [[WP:SYNTH]] to move from "discovered by Cartman" to "given an English name based on him". I'll remove the name from the list until a source is found that uses this name – otherwise we are in danger of generating a name ourselves. [[User:Peter coxhead|Peter coxhead]] ([[User talk:Peter coxhead#top|talk]]) 07:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Phacelias}} but it doesn't say that the English name is "Cartman's buttercup", so it's (mild) [[WP:SYNTH]] to move from "discovered by Cartman" to "given an English name based on him". I'll remove the name from the list until a source is found that uses this name – otherwise we are in danger of generating a name ourselves. [[User:Peter coxhead|Peter coxhead]] ([[User talk:Peter coxhead#top|talk]]) 07:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
::::I agree, thank you. Anyway, it is an Alpine buttercup, but that is not it's common name --[[User:Phacelias|<span style="color: #7b68ee;"><em>Phacelias</em></span>]] ([[User talk:Phacelias|talk]]) 08:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
::::I agree, thank you. Anyway, it is an Alpine buttercup, but that is not it's common name --[[User:Phacelias|<span style="color: #7b68ee;"><em>Phacelias</em></span>]] ([[User talk:Phacelias|talk]]) 08:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

== Phryma ==

Looks like you're the primary editor for Phryma. The photo used for the Phryma article is not Phryma leptostachya (or Phrymaceae at all). I suspect it's a legume of some kind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:American_Lop-seed_(Phryma_leptostachya)_(5909584841).jpg [[Special:Contributions/98.192.193.83|98.192.193.83]] ([[User talk:98.192.193.83|talk]]) 19:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:48, 5 August 2022

Please note that if you leave a message for me here, I'll reply to it here, so put this page on your watch list.
If I left a message on your talk page, you can reply there as I'll be watching your page.
This makes it easier to follow the conversation.
Thanks!

TUSC token 4e41785016df312d7f4772b046fd919f

I now have a TUSC account!

Plant article naming convention

Hi Peter coxhead. There is a plant article naming convention request at the Help Desk. I saw your name listed at Naming_conventions_(flora) contributions and am hoping you would post your thoughts at How long does speedy deletion usually take?.[1] I asked Pmanderson on the Pmanderson talk page, but not sure if she/he will see the request. Thanks. --

tetrahedronX7

Hey thank you for editing . My friend

Lists of Salticidae species

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Salticidae species (2nd nomination). Thanks!

Mail message sent

Hello, Peter coxhead. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Photo Removal

I'm new to all this but eager to make positive contributions. I just want to thank you for all the work you do here. You've removed several of my photos recently but I see that your reasoning is sound. Soryy to make more work for you. I'll try to be more pertinent and concise in the future. Thanks!

Wikimedia South Africa AGM

You are invited to the 2021 South African Wikimedia General Meeting

You are Invited to the 2021 Wikimedia South Africa General Meeting
25th September 2021 starting at 10:00 on Zoom Meeting Link
WMZA Webstite / Wikipedia South Africa Meetup / 2021 AGM

Nomination for deletion of Template:Speciesbox/hybrid name

Template:Speciesbox/hybrid name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ranunculus Acraeus

Hi Peter coxhead. Thank you for deleting the common name Alpine buttercup in Ranunculus acraeus. I propose to insert as common name Cartman's buttercup, since that is the name that is given to the plant R. acraeus in the List of Ranunculus species. Do you think we should find an external source for this common name? Phacelias (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Phacelias: all vernacular names should be sourced, like all other information. There seems to be a convention that English names can be added to species lists without a reference, so long as there is one in the linked article, although I'm not sure that this is in line with policy on sourcing. If there's no source for "Cartman's buttercup", it should not be present either in the list or in the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Goodmorning, You think this webpage might be accepted as a source? The buttercup is described by Heenan but was discovered by Joe Cartman Phacelias (talk) 06:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Phacelias: but it doesn't say that the English name is "Cartman's buttercup", so it's (mild) WP:SYNTH to move from "discovered by Cartman" to "given an English name based on him". I'll remove the name from the list until a source is found that uses this name – otherwise we are in danger of generating a name ourselves. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, thank you. Anyway, it is an Alpine buttercup, but that is not it's common name --Phacelias (talk) 08:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Phryma

Looks like you're the primary editor for Phryma. The photo used for the Phryma article is not Phryma leptostachya (or Phrymaceae at all). I suspect it's a legume of some kind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:American_Lop-seed_(Phryma_leptostachya)_(5909584841).jpg 98.192.193.83 (talk) 19:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]