Talk:Schild equation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:54, 27 August 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Schild equation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pharmacology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eons ago I uploaded an image and forgot the copyright (Why is the GNU not default!) I think it was this, but I have many so not usre if to swarm the page. --Squidonius (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The variables and constants need proper definition within the article. For example the difference between Kd' and Kb is not obvious. 128.252.11.222 (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs revision and expansion.

For a start, the title is inappropriate. It should be "The Schild Equation".Calling it the Schild regression implies a particular method of estimation of the parameters given some data. The classical Schild plot isn't the best way to do this.

Furthermore the derivation given, though similar to that given by Schild, disguises the fact that the Schild equation has been shown to have far wider validity than Schild realised.

Also it is wrong to say that the first radioligand binding experiment was done by Lefkowitz et al (1970). This reference should be toPaton and Rannnng (1966) David Colquhoun (talk) 20:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The variables and constants need proper definition within the article. For example the difference between Kd' and Kb is not obvious. [[Special:Contributions/128.252.11.222|128.252.11.222]] ([[User talk:128.252.11.222|talk]]) 16:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
+== This page needs revision and expansion. ==
+For a  start, the title is inappropriate. It should be "The Schild Equation".Calling it the Schild regression implies a particular method of estimation of the parameters given some data. The classical Schild plot isn't the best way to do this.
+Furthermore the derivation given, though similar to that given by Schild, disguises the fact that the Schild equation has been shown to have far wider validity than Schild realised.
+Also it is wrong to say that the first radioligand binding experiment was done by Lefkowitz et al (1970).
+This reference should be toPaton and Rannnng (1966) [[User:David Colquhoun|David Colquhoun]] ([[User talk:David Colquhoun|talk]]) 20:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)