Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynata: Difference between revisions
Bluerasberry (talk | contribs) unsure... |
Can't it be saved? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You guys are the experts (I can tell by the special language you use) whereas I am just a common reader who mostly contributes money. But it seems that if this article (Dynata) receives a lot of hits it probably shows that people have a lot of interest in this real company. |
|||
On the other hand, the experts say it (the Dynata article) is poorly written so the rules say it should be deleted. |
|||
Isn't there room for a more moderate position? |
|||
===[[:Dynata]]=== |
===[[:Dynata]]=== |
||
Revision as of 18:06, 3 September 2022
You guys are the experts (I can tell by the special language you use) whereas I am just a common reader who mostly contributes money. But it seems that if this article (Dynata) receives a lot of hits it probably shows that people have a lot of interest in this real company. On the other hand, the experts say it (the Dynata article) is poorly written so the rules say it should be deleted. Isn't there room for a more moderate position?
Dynata
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dynata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources rely on press releases masquerading as legitimate sources. The CNN article is more about Meyerson, a non notable figure. Appears to be primarily written by someone close to the subject with little more expansion from third parties to meet notability guidelines realistically possible. Outdatedpizza (talk) 01:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, Connecticut, and Texas. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete zero hits on the company, hits on the name for anything and everything else though. Oaktree b (talk) 14:40, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Why would this article be a candidate for deletion? Dynata is a real company that does real business that annoys real people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C42:657F:972A:5545:693F:5816:F534 (talk) 00:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has specific objective criteria at WP:N and the claim is that this article fails those criteria. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Unsure The sources are poor as claimed. I want to share something - this is not a rationale for keeping, but this is weird -
- According to Wikipedia Pageviews, this has been a very popular (top 1%?) Wikipedia article by traffic for some months, and rather popular before that. It is very uncommon for an organization to have such popularity without there existing good media coverage. I presume we are missing sources, or otherwise, there is something weird happening here. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)