Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 September 5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:17, 5 September 2022

< September 4	September 6 >

September 5

No transclusions; redundant to {{8TeamBracket-PagePlayoff}} (without the line spaghetti). – Pbrks ^(t • c) 18:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The AFL and NBL final 8 system require the so called "line spaghetti" as teams cross halves of the draw unlike the page 8 system. These are not redundant templates. Please do not touch the NBL and AFL articles until there is a resolution. RoryK8 (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. The text "Winner advances to Preliminary finals" is clear enough that the winning teams advance to the next round. No readers would be confused trying to figure out how Team X made it from Round 2 to Round 3. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 21:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they would, they suddenly change halves of the draw, this is a different finals system to the one you have put on all of the AFL pages without any consultation with WP:AFL or any consideration whatsoever. RoryK8 (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's less clear than the bracket that was used previously where it showed you which match the week two winners went to. RoryK8 (talk) 22:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Neatpair

Template:Neatpair (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:London Resort

Template:London Resort (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One transclusion in the main article. Body of navbox contains only one link, which goes back to the main article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds

Template:2014 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2015 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2016 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2017 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2018 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2019 US Open Cup Bracket early rounds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:8TeamBracket-Ultimate

Template:8TeamBracket-Ultimate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RDRBrackets

Template:RDRBrackets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{16TeamBracket-4way}}. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stargate racebox

Template:Stargate racebox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Super rugby finals

Template:Super rugby finals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{6TeamBracket-info}}. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IPL Knockout-with 3rd

Template:IPL Knockout-with 3rd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:IPL Knockout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:4TeamBracket-PagePlayoff-Wide (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Redundant to {{4TeamBracket-info}} and {{4TeamBracket-PagePlayoff}}. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 03:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Indian Premier League doesn't need separate templates, no matter how much members of that WikiProject try to be different from everyone else. And no proper use case for the wide playoff template either. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, and the comments of Joseph2302. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PRSLPlayoffs

Template:PRSLPlayoffs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{4TeamBracket-Stepladder}} – Pbrks ^(t • c) 03:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:12TeamBracket-2Round

Template:12TeamBracket-2Round (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 03:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Panch Kedar

Template:Panch Kedar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Panch Prayag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both of these are not templates, but instead a collage of images of the temples. And should be substituted either all articles used or just the mainspace articles the templates are the namesakes of. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hindu temples in Myanmar

Template:Hindu temples in Myanmar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Three links. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia size & users

Template:Wikipedia size & users (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template, recommend subst and delete Izno (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see how deletion gains anything - this is the sort of template that could well have more than just the single use. A use case of users displaying them on their userpages would be a reasonable use and not against policy, I don't see any compelling reason that substing and deleting is needed or would really have any benefit. Hog Farm _Talk 21:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A handful of users utilize it, and a fair amount of work went into it. Substituting would add a long list of wiki markup to users' pages, which would look sloppy. Every template that is not used a great deal does not need to be deleted. Wikipedia servers are not running out of space. Deletion wouldn't provide any benefit. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 *:I disagree. The text "''Winner advances to Preliminary finals''" is clear enough that the winning teams advance to the next round. No readers would be confused trying to figure out how Team X made it from Round 2 to Round 3. –&nbsp;[[User:Pbrks|Pbrks]]&nbsp;<sup><span style="font-variant:small-caps">([[User talk:Pbrks#top|t]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contribs/Pbrks|c]])</span></sup> 21:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 *::Yes they would, they suddenly change halves of the draw, this is a different finals system to the one you have put on all of the AFL pages without any consultation with WP:AFL or any consideration whatsoever. [[User:RoryK8|RoryK8]] ([[User talk:RoryK8|talk]]) 22:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
+*:::It's less clear than the bracket that was used previously where it showed you which match the week two winners went to. [[User:RoryK8|RoryK8]] ([[User talk:RoryK8|talk]]) 22:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 ==== [[Template:Neatpair]] ====