Template talk:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars: Difference between revisions
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Replace "Operation Meghdoot" with "[[Siachen Conflict]]." Meghdoot is an operation, not an entire conflict. Besides, it's the only conflict in the template named after a single operation. [[user:Cipher21|<span style="font-family:Arial; color:Maroon; text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''''Cipher21'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Cipher21|<span style="color:Navy;font-size:75%;">'''(talk)'''</span>]] 11:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC) |
Replace "Operation Meghdoot" with "[[Siachen Conflict]]." Meghdoot is an operation, not an entire conflict. Besides, it's the only conflict in the template named after a single operation. [[user:Cipher21|<span style="font-family:Arial; color:Maroon; text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''''Cipher21'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Cipher21|<span style="color:Navy;font-size:75%;">'''(talk)'''</span>]] 11:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
*{{yo|Cipher21}} Since the Siachen conflict is already linked further up in the template, inserting another link isn't sensible. I have, however, checked the edit history and it appears that the link to Operation Meghdoot was added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Campaignbox_Indo-Pakistani_Wars&diff=prev&oldid=983943509 fairly recently] as part of a general change in structure. From what I can see, listing an individual operation that is clearly part of the Kashmir conflict under Other conflicts makes no sense, and I have accordingly removed the link. '''[[User:AngryHarpy|<span style="color:#6363ed">Angry</span>]][[Special:Contributions/AngryHarpy|<span style="color:#a863ed">Harpy</span>]]'''<span style="visibility:hidden; color:transparent; padding-left:2px">{{zero width joiner}}</span><sup><small>[[User talk:AngryHarpy|<span style="color:#63a8ed">talk</span>]]</small></sup> 10:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC) |
*{{yo|Cipher21}} Since the Siachen conflict is already linked further up in the template, inserting another link isn't sensible. I have, however, checked the edit history and it appears that the link to Operation Meghdoot was added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Campaignbox_Indo-Pakistani_Wars&diff=prev&oldid=983943509 fairly recently] as part of a general change in structure. From what I can see, listing an individual operation that is clearly part of the Kashmir conflict under Other conflicts makes no sense, and I have accordingly removed the link. '''[[User:AngryHarpy|<span style="color:#6363ed">Angry</span>]][[Special:Contributions/AngryHarpy|<span style="color:#a863ed">Harpy</span>]]'''<span style="visibility:hidden; color:transparent; padding-left:2px">{{zero width joiner}}</span><sup><small>[[User talk:AngryHarpy|<span style="color:#63a8ed">talk</span>]]</small></sup> 10:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 October 2022 == |
|||
{{edit extended-protected|Template:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars|answered=no}} |
|||
Please add [[1958 East Pakistan–India border skirmish]] [[Special:Contributions/103.244.173.68|103.244.173.68]] ([[User talk:103.244.173.68|talk]]) 15:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:36, 11 October 2022
India Template‑class | |||||||
|
Pakistan Template‑class | |||||||
|
South Asia NA‑class | |||||||
|
Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operation Meghdoot
It was an Indo-Pakistani confrontation not part of the other wars listed. See the campaignbox for the Arab-Israeli conflict what's included there --TheFEARgod (Ч) 22:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- This one seems fairly sensible; regardless of whether it's an "Indo-Pakistani War" in its own right, it's an operation within the larger "Indo-Pakistani Wars"—and not within any of the wars already listed—and so ought to be linked here. Kirill Lokshin 22:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have a few points. Arab Israeli conflict is different from the terminology of the war used for the Ind-Pak scenario. Having said that, Op Meghdoot does NOT encompass the "Siachen War". Since 1984 both countries have fought numerous times during the "Siachen War" and op meghdoot was but one of the battles/operations in this war. If the link to Siachen War is to be added then an article about the war that covers the conflicts of 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 95 and other minor ops and attacks that resulted in loss of territory (in '86-'87). In the line of Cold War the Siachen War should encompass these battles and the Siachen War link should point to Siachen War or Siachen Conflict that includes Op Meghdoot and other ops from both India and Pakistan like Operation Rajiv etc. Idleguy 04:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- if you have enough information, I support your idea of starting this new article. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, having a broader article would be a good thing. Having said that, I think the campaignbox should continue to be labeled as "Indo-Pakistani Wars" rather than "Indo-Pakistani conflict", as I'm pretty sure that the first term is the more commonly used one for the entire broad conflict (although I may very well be wrong on this point). Kirill Lokshin 13:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- if you have enough information, I support your idea of starting this new article. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have a few points. Arab Israeli conflict is different from the terminology of the war used for the Ind-Pak scenario. Having said that, Op Meghdoot does NOT encompass the "Siachen War". Since 1984 both countries have fought numerous times during the "Siachen War" and op meghdoot was but one of the battles/operations in this war. If the link to Siachen War is to be added then an article about the war that covers the conflicts of 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 95 and other minor ops and attacks that resulted in loss of territory (in '86-'87). In the line of Cold War the Siachen War should encompass these battles and the Siachen War link should point to Siachen War or Siachen Conflict that includes Op Meghdoot and other ops from both India and Pakistan like Operation Rajiv etc. Idleguy 04:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- If the title is the popularly known "Indo-Pakistani Wars", then Siachen Glacier conflict cannot be used under this title, cuz few sources refer to the Siachen conflict as among the four wars. Take the example of books published by several authors on the Ind-pak wars and you'll find that most refer to the 3 major wars and Kargil (sometimes as a mini-war or the 4th war). not one single credible reference I have come across - leaving websites - have stated Siachen to be a war. If it is not a war by general consensus, then how can it be included under "Indo-Pakistani Wars"? If it is to be included as a conflict, the Indo-pakistani conflicts is again a seldom used name. For now, i'm delinking the Operation Meghdoot from the conflictbox until it is corrected. Disinformation is worse than no information. Idleguy 07:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Or I think it'd be a slightly better compromise to reword Indo-Pakistani Wars to Indo-Pakistani Wars and conflicts. Only then can Siachen Glacier fit properly as a conflict; again not Operation Meghdoot, which is not a war but akin to a battle. Idleguy 07:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 August 2019
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes should be added in this template as it related to the conflict between India and Pakistan. If possible, can it be named as Operation swift retort in the template as that was the code name of Pakistan airstrikes in India. Source: [1] 188.66.181.146 (talk) 17:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 November 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace "Operation Meghdoot" with "Siachen Conflict." Meghdoot is an operation, not an entire conflict. Besides, it's the only conflict in the template named after a single operation. Cipher21 (talk) 11:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cipher21: Since the Siachen conflict is already linked further up in the template, inserting another link isn't sensible. I have, however, checked the edit history and it appears that the link to Operation Meghdoot was added fairly recently as part of a general change in structure. From what I can see, listing an individual operation that is clearly part of the Kashmir conflict under Other conflicts makes no sense, and I have accordingly removed the link. AngryHarpytalk 10:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 October 2022
It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected template at Template:Campaignbox Indo-Pakistani Wars. (edit · history · last · links · transclusion count · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
Please add 1958 East Pakistan–India border skirmish 103.244.173.68 (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Template-Class India articles
- NA-importance India articles
- Template-Class India articles of NA-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Template-Class Pakistan articles
- NA-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- NA-Class South Asia articles
- NA-importance South Asia articles
- South Asia articles
- Template-Class military history articles
- Template-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Template-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- Template-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests