Jump to content

Talk:The Cadfael Chronicles: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No sources, possibly OR: spelling error corrected
Line 14: Line 14:
== No sources, possibly OR ==
== No sources, possibly OR ==


On the contrary to the poster above: the article cites barely no sources and states a lot of unsourced facts and opinions. Basically two thirds of it should be omitted by WP guidelines on the near future, if someone doesnt work in sources. (I am not able to do this.) [[Special:Contributions/95.90.129.104|95.90.129.104]] ([[User talk:95.90.129.104|talk]]) 10:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
On the contrary to the poster above: the article cites barely no sources and states a lot of unsourced facts and opinions. Basically two thirds of it should be omitted by WP guidelines in the near future, if someone doesnt work in sources. (I am not able to do this.) [[Special:Contributions/95.90.129.104|95.90.129.104]] ([[User talk:95.90.129.104|talk]]) 10:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:54, 4 November 2022

Untitled

split from Cadfael per suggestion. Accotink2 talk 13:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More than Start class article

This article is more than Start class. It is well-written, with citations. I hope it can be reviewed and raised up in class. --Prairieplant (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No sources, possibly OR

On the contrary to the poster above: the article cites barely no sources and states a lot of unsourced facts and opinions. Basically two thirds of it should be omitted by WP guidelines in the near future, if someone doesnt work in sources. (I am not able to do this.) 95.90.129.104 (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]