Jump to content

Talk:Project West Ford: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Did it work?: new section
Line 17: Line 17:
==Jan 2018==
==Jan 2018==
Why is the inclination of remaining debris scattered globally at the stuffinspace link, if there were only 2 specific inclinations (only 9 degrees apart) in the original launch? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.240.32.96|24.240.32.96]] ([[User talk:24.240.32.96#top|talk]]) 17:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Why is the inclination of remaining debris scattered globally at the stuffinspace link, if there were only 2 specific inclinations (only 9 degrees apart) in the original launch? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.240.32.96|24.240.32.96]] ([[User talk:24.240.32.96#top|talk]]) 17:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:because variations in drag eventually result in variations in altitude, and then [[nodal precession]] happens relatively more quickly at the relatively lower altitude. [[Special:Contributions/135.180.194.177|135.180.194.177]] ([[User talk:135.180.194.177|talk]]) 22:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


==May 2006==
==May 2006==

Revision as of 22:25, 5 November 2022

Jan 2018

Why is the inclination of remaining debris scattered globally at the stuffinspace link, if there were only 2 specific inclinations (only 9 degrees apart) in the original launch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.32.96 (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

because variations in drag eventually result in variations in altitude, and then nodal precession happens relatively more quickly at the relatively lower altitude. 135.180.194.177 (talk) 22:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

Why is it that the article for this page is the exact same text as the one from this: http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=516

?

69.249.146.101 22:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was copy/pasted from there... Even the pictures... --Falcorian (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Сраные пендосы — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.255.165.56 (talk)

13:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Potty mouth. 86.184.196.105 (talk) 23:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What keeps the clumps together ?

What substance keeps the clumps together? Will the binding component disintegrate over time ? Glue ? Napalm ? 51.174.226.245 (talk) 12:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's just that all the needles are on a similar orbit, so they travel around together. --Falcorian (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I belive it is spot wielding, as this video suggests. - 56independent (talk) 21:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A stub?

Not anymore! I gave it a B-class. Nicely sourced and chock full of information. Thank you. --Neopeius (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Project West Ford or Project Westford?

The article is currently inconsistent, when it should consistently use one form or the other. If both are correct, one form should be chosen for the article, and the other should be noted in the "also known as" section at the top. 108.246.204.20 (talk) 05:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is very nice

😩😩😩 212.219.116.90 (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did it work?

The article says nothing about whether the 8 MHz radio tests made successful use of this artificial ionosphere or not. Does anyone know? Thanks Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]