Talk:Addendum: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 1121969012 by 85.193.215.210 (talk) inappropriate removal of other people's posts |
Undid. The article talk page is not a forum. If you disagree with my suggestion to replace "subsequent to" with "after", then present your ARGUMENTS, if you have any. Besides, both of your posts constitute a personal attack. |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
To improve [[Wikipedia:Use plain English|readability]] I suggest to replace "subsequent to" with "after". If I do it by myself, my edit will be reverted by [[WP:BKFIP]]. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 01:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
To improve [[Wikipedia:Use plain English|readability]] I suggest to replace "subsequent to" with "after". If I do it by myself, my edit will be reverted by [[WP:BKFIP]]. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 01:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
: Unnecessary. You probably want to be at the Simple English Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/86.187.169.142|86.187.169.142]] ([[User talk:86.187.169.142|talk]]) 18:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::I see that you generated a new IP (from [[Chepstow]]) only to response here, so I must be very important to you :-) Unfortunately for you, Wikipedia is not my great passion. From time to time, I did use to make some copy-edits, but only to improve my English. Besides, Wikipedia, unlike my real passions, has never put me in the state of '''[[Flow (psychology)|flow]]'''. This is why I never get bored, and don't need Wikipedia as a remedy for boredom. As for Simple English Wikipedia, there is a huge difference between [[basic English]] used there and [[plain English]], promoted by me here. So, it is not a serious alternative to me. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 18:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::: As someone else said to you elsewhere: teach yourself some other language and go plague their Wikipedia. Your incompetent hectoring is not welcome here. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.108.179|82.13.108.179]] ([[User talk:82.13.108.179|talk]]) 21:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:09, 19 November 2022
Books Start‑class | |||||||
|
Law Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Law Schools
Actually, graduate school applications in general. We should have a short note about how people write addenda when they apply to graduate and / or professional school. 72.192.141.101 04:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Annex Vs Appendix
There is an interesting and unresolved (im my opinion) discussion about the differences between annex and appendix, I would be happy if someone can en-light about the differences and specify a reliable source. From what I read so far, there seems to be conflicting definitions. Weiss gal (talk) 09:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Huh?
"...is an addition required to be made to a document by its reader..." By its writer, surely? An addendum to a book is not dictated by its readers, but something added by an author or publisher usually after the main work has been typeset/arranged and is considered too difficult to change, or similarly for a reprint etc. 188.222.184.114 (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
"Appendix"
The usage and primary topic of Appendix is under discussion, see talk:Vermiform appendix -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
"subsequent to" -> "after"
To improve readability I suggest to replace "subsequent to" with "after". If I do it by myself, my edit will be reverted by WP:BKFIP. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 01:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)