Talk:Zero-COVID: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:45, 27 November 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zero-COVID article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

COVID-19 C‑class Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Disaster management C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine C‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan does NOT have a zero-covid policy

And the articles linked do not suggest that it does. The main linked article when I first removed that passage was an editorial, not policy. Now a Bloomberg article from December has been linked that just says that cases are low. They're surging now, and there is no enforcement of isolation or proper contact tracing. There is NO zero covid policy here in Japan.

126.116.44.167 (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, please remember to follow WP:BRD, which you did not appear to do here. Upon rereading the BMJ piece, I do agree with your conclusion and offer you my apologies as I should not have reverted your edit in the first place. However, the method by which you made the next edit was improper. From now on, please discuss on the talk page before reverting a BOLD edit you made to an article. The outcome would have been the same, after we both agreed to remove the mention. But by not following BRD, you increase the likelihood of edit warring. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 17:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WA Covid

The state of Western Australia will open on 03/03/2022, and while restrictions remain, zero-covid is no longer imposed and currently, there is only a mitigation strategy. As a result, I removed that part- VickKiang (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of Canada did not follow the Zero-COVID policy

I was so surprised to see Canada here as the country did not follow Zero-COVID nor did most provinces officially outline Zero-COVID as their policy. Sure Atlantic Canada did it with the Atlantic Bubble but the section here on Canada doesn't even talk about it.Terramorphous (talk) 09:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What?// Will come back and fix this this week. Going For Zero: - Canada Is One Big Pandemic Response Experiment. It Proves ‘Zero COVID’ Is Best--Moxy-

17:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant discussion: How should we include allegations of China undercounting COVID-19 cases and deaths

You are invited to join in at Talk:Chinese government response to COVID-19 § RFC: How should we include allegations of undercounting?. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 13:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV

This article ought to cover the protests against this policy in China. The article and especially the section on China reads like a promotional piece extolling the benefits of the policy. 5.195.36.6 (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|25px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join in at [[Talk:Chinese government response to COVID-19#RFC: How should we include allegations of undercounting?|Talk:Chinese government response to COVID-19 §&nbsp;RFC: How should we include allegations of undercounting?]].  —&nbsp;[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 13:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
+== POV ==
+This article ought to cover the protests against this policy in China. The article and especially the section on China reads like a promotional piece extolling the benefits of the policy. [[Special:Contributions/5.195.36.6|5.195.36.6]] ([[User talk:5.195.36.6|talk]]) 22:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)