Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 9: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by WikiManGreen (talk) to last version by CarshaltonNews
No edit summary
Line 119: Line 119:


Yeh You deleted my topics about Creekers. Why? it was a description of the people in West Virigina. and Further more Dont delete my stuff with out asking
Yeh You deleted my topics about Creekers. Why? it was a description of the people in West Virigina. and Further more Dont delete my stuff with out asking

Well don't delete people's articles for no reason if you don't want people pissed at you.

Revision as of 17:16, 5 March 2007

Archives:

Please add all comments below the line.


The difference in this story is that Gary Peach is a child worker and worked with very young children. Like I said in the discussion more info will be adding shortly, with quotes etc etc. Also how can u say its not important enough the whole idea of wikipedia is for people to come on here and find things out they didnt know before. If a paedophile that has been playing around with children isnt important enough then why is Michael Jackson or Gary Glitter on here. You owe it to the people of Surrey/London to keep this up for safety if nothing else.


Hello this is in regards to a deletion made sunday march 04, 2007. The page I created for the band The Flypaper Cartel was removed under the grounds that it did not meet criteria required for a page on a musical artist. In fact, there was an article published online and in the paper Los Angeles Alternative on friday, august 25th 2006, at 10:56 am. The article was titled "Side Stage" and subtitled "spotlighting the best of local music: The Flypaper Cartel." While creating the page, I searched the online records for a citation of this article and found that the newspaper deletes its archived articles after a certain period of time. This is a band I care very deeply about, and recognition on Wikipedia would be an exciting achievement. --[[User:MARTINtheHIRSH 19:42, 4 March 2007



Ok, I undestrand the removal of the page. Apology... but why are there so many others pages about companies that are not deleted ?


Was it you removing all that I have spend my intire day on? drone (band) has been totally removed! THANKS ALOT FOR RUINING MY DAY!


hmmmm, I asked for a little more time, but you couldnt! I think its very rude of you just deleting my article on that foundation - I WAS FIXING IT GOD DAMIT! Now I will do it all over! Ramus


Thank you, apology appreciated and accepted. --Nick Scratch 00:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Still waiting for that apology... --Nick Scratch 23:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


An article that I started (and you graciously approved) about the disc jockey Ginny Sanchez has a new notability dispute from a user who is a Ron and Fez and Opie and Anthony fan. The criterion used, based on this user's contribution history, appears to be whether or not Ms. Sanchez is a current "show character" on the specific radio show the editor listens to. ("wackbagger" is a term used for a fan of the Opie and Anthony or Ron and Fez shows, who also is a message board poster to wackbag.com.)

I am not about to remove this tag myself, but rather ask you to revisit the page to make a decision about user:whackbagger's notability tag.

The same user, using two different accounts, User:Chrysalis83 and User:Chrysalis99, has created this article four times today with the same nonsense content. Delete and salt? Thanks for looking into this. Darkspots 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Why did you delete my question and ignore it??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreaterCroatia (talkcontribs) 12:52, March 1, 2007

D. Mikels Revisited (Briefly)

In just 5 minutes, I have found four articles about authors D. Mikels knows personally. All of them have self-published their books. Thanks once again for demonstrating your: 1) Inconsistency; and 2) Incompetence. Is it any wonder this website is not viewed with any credibility? Rock on, Wiki!

Demonstrative2627 15:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regards to the vandalism

Sorry this IP is used by every studen in the school over 400 computers.... It would be the students vandalizing the pages. - 66.240.30.54 13:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but you should not go deleting my stuff i put up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerry89 (talkcontribs) 16:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

? No they didn't. You violated Wikipedia's deletion policy simply because of yur personal agenda.

Please restore my contributns.

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 22:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me[reply]

Deletion of Page for Tero

The subject and entry I created regarding the global Tero currency was deleted for no apparent reason. This article was of international significance and represents the efforts, writing, and concepts of many people in the field of economics and global banking.

Please inform me as to why the article was deleted, and what needs to be done to recreate it.

The action seems to be malicious, unjust and petty.


Thanks. Jake Jacobs

--Kljacobs13 02:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Page for Grammarpalooza

The article that you deleted was not eligable for deletion due to the fact it was 'notable' - as the Grammarpalooza rock concert is a medium through which many bands have performed and used as a stepping stone on which to launch themselves onto the world music stage (see Dappled Cities Fly). It is quite possibly the only concert of its type in Australia where minors can perform to a large audience through such a medium. Also, it has lead to many bands now playing around Australia, as they were formed at Grammarpalooza. As you do not live in Australia, I must ask how you decided if the article was notable as you do not understand the context...

Reiterating the comments of Jake Jacobs, you seem to be deleting articles for no reason at all so I would suggest that you discuss the notability of the article with the author before you decide that is is not notable to yourself as you have not heard of it.

Thankyou

--Shagudiga

74434

thanks for deleting that article. I had no idea what that nonsense was about. Mcoop06 03:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Creek Rage Crew

Hey i have another question. I'm a recent changes patroller and I noticed the artle "The Creek Rage Crew" I don't believe there is any notability to this article. maybe you could check it out since your an admin. Mcoop06 04:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! =] Mcoop06 04:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

David Robertson (wrestler), in my opinion, asserted notbility, so I have restored it. It can of course be "prod"ed or AfD'd. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 19:13 4 March 2007 (GMT).

The ghetto revival?

U are going to be sorry that you deleted the article because they are a growing band and company. It is important cause he was on TV and it was on a show enjoyed by millions. Ur lame for doing that. I hope you feel bad cause you hurt my feelings. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrownMorristown (talkcontribs) 23:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hank Braxtan

Hank Braxtan - I'm having a hard time understanding why the article on Hank Braxtan was deleted. Under the guidelines I read here on Wikipedia, filmmakers only need a significant fan base or notable works. Actually, he has both. First off, he is published under the IMDb, and they are quite specific on whom they will allow into their database as well. His movies have been premiered at Independent Film Festivals as well. Additionally, I checked to make sure the article would be allowed prior to starting it. Finally, I am confused as to why the article was "speedily deleted" when there might've been some question as to his notability. It was my understanding that in that situation, there was supposed to be some contest to it, or some discussion to take place. Please let me know what the issue is, and I can spend another 4 hours rewriting the article. Thank you. Steven Williamson 22:35 4 March 2007 EST

Deletion of Zion (IRC)

Hi there.

You deleted my Zion (IRC) article.

As mentioned, it was work in progress.. I had to restart my computer. Maybe if I had posted that it would have made a difference? In any case, I'd like to rewrite it, this time making sure that should I save the page, there is significant assertion of notability.

Could you post the contents of the page in my talk page or email it to me@fusionstream.org.

Thanks a bunch,
Shawn.
BlueStream 15:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Admin; Should be banned

Yeh You deleted my topics about Creekers. Why? it was a description of the people in West Virigina. and Further more Dont delete my stuff with out asking

Well don't delete people's articles for no reason if you don't want people pissed at you.