User talk:Kanashimi: Difference between revisions
→Cewbot: Reply |
→Category 20th/21st century Thai Women Scientists: new section |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
::I'm not sure. When I viewed the page, none of the files were loading in the current revision but were in the previous versions, so I reverted it. Now looking at the page history, the files are fine on the bot's revision. Strange. [[User:Ironmatic1|Ironmatic1]] ([[User talk:Ironmatic1|talk]]) 07:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |
::I'm not sure. When I viewed the page, none of the files were loading in the current revision but were in the previous versions, so I reverted it. Now looking at the page history, the files are fine on the bot's revision. Strange. [[User:Ironmatic1|Ironmatic1]] ([[User talk:Ironmatic1|talk]]) 07:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::Fortunately, there is no problem now. [[User:Kanashimi|Kanashimi]] ([[User talk:Kanashimi#top|talk]]) 10:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |
:::Fortunately, there is no problem now. [[User:Kanashimi|Kanashimi]] ([[User talk:Kanashimi#top|talk]]) 10:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Category 20th/21st century Thai Women Scientists == |
|||
Please can Kesara Margrét Anamthawat-Jónsson be added to these categories, along with Her Royal Highness Princess Chulabhorn? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kesara_Margr%C3%A9t_Anamthawat-J%C3%B3nsson Pat Heslop-Harrison 12:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:08, 9 February 2023
|
|
|
Possible change to Template:WikiProject banner shell
See Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#Project-independent quality assessments. There is agreement here on proposing a change to {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Within the next few days I will launch this at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals), and if that is approved will start testing the change to {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Basically, it would add a new parameter to the template, |class=, and if a value is supplied would add a line above the present text saying something like "This article has been rated C-class under the content assessment guidelines.
![]() | This article has been rated C-class under the content assessment guidelines. This page is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
Possibly, depending on discussion, it will allow omission of the |1= parameter, giving something like:
![]() | This article has been rated C-class under the content assessment guidelines. |
Assuming it goes forward, how should the change be handled to minimize impact on Cewbot 3? Aymatth2 (talk) 15:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. I have modified the code and it should work in the future. Kanashimi (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Tropical cyclone anchors
What exactly does the Cewbot mean by inactive anchors and one no longer being available? All the ones I am looking at still work as they are supposed to. Some were deleted in cases of vandalism and other times the flagged revision didnt even have a changed anchor. NoahTalk 12:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Hurricane Noah Thank you for your feedback. This is indeed a problem, can you give me a more specific some examples? It would be easier for me to check where the problem is. Thank you. Kanashimi (talk) 23:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Flagged at Talk:Cyclone Dumazile: [1] (an edit from 2011)
- Flagged at Talk:Cyclone Nora: [2] (for both; not even related to the flagged issue)
- Should I check and revert these notices if it is like this? NoahTalk 23:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Hurricane Noah: Yeah I found this issue at Townsville, where the bot thinks Tropical cyclone scales#Australia is an inactive anchor despite me fixing it at the source. Graham87 01:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- I found that this is because there is a bug in the parser, I have corrected it now and it should be back to normal after the code is updated. Kanashimi (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Hurricane Noah: Yeah I found this issue at Townsville, where the bot thinks Tropical cyclone scales#Australia is an inactive anchor despite me fixing it at the source. Graham87 01:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Normalize Multiple issues
I think this will be incorrect in most instances. Certainly any template that has an inline version probably was meant to be the inline. I don't know if it would be better for Cewbot to add the inline in stead – and that will be complicated code if you do so – but that might be an improvement. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. It's really difficult to distinguish this type of maintenance template, because I've been in a similar situation before, but it should be placed at the beginning of the article. In any case, since it was difficult for the robot to tell if it should be placed at the beginning of the article, I have since placed them all at the start of the article. In this case, this kind of maintenance template in the middle of the article does not seem to be a good idea, perhaps it is a wrong use of the templates? I wonder how you think it? Kanashimi (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wrong use of templates. {{Disputed}} ⇨ {{Disputed inline}}, {{Unreliable sources}} ⇨ {{Unreliable source?}}. I think you will find that difficult.
- However on a different subject this is perfect. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the misuse of these templates is actually a problem that editors should be aware of. Kanashimi (talk) 23:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Cewbot
Hello, I'd like to bring it to your attention that whatever Cewbot did in its edit to Cadence completely broke every file on the page. Seems crazy how this happened as it only changed 9 characters. Ironmatic1 (talk) 07:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. Can you describe in more detail what is going wrong? In my view, Brandenburg Concertos#Concerto No. 3 in G major, BWV 1048 is an effective web anchor, but Brandenburg Concertos#No. 3 in G major, BWV 1048 is not. Kanashimi (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. When I viewed the page, none of the files were loading in the current revision but were in the previous versions, so I reverted it. Now looking at the page history, the files are fine on the bot's revision. Strange. Ironmatic1 (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Fortunately, there is no problem now. Kanashimi (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. When I viewed the page, none of the files were loading in the current revision but were in the previous versions, so I reverted it. Now looking at the page history, the files are fine on the bot's revision. Strange. Ironmatic1 (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Category 20th/21st century Thai Women Scientists
Please can Kesara Margrét Anamthawat-Jónsson be added to these categories, along with Her Royal Highness Princess Chulabhorn? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kesara_Margr%C3%A9t_Anamthawat-J%C3%B3nsson Pat Heslop-Harrison 12:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)