Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mica Gallery: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:09, 15 March 2023

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An art gallery which seems to fail to meet the criteria of WP:NORG. The only source is an old business listing. My searches have come up with nothing better. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and United Kingdom. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing found for the business. Scattered hits for things made of mica in galleries. Oaktree b (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - an online WP:Before search revealed a few listings in databases, a statement by the owner of the gallery on why she started the gallery, and a review of an artist's work at the gallery (but notability is not inherited from the artists even if the artists they show are notable.) This is not enough to meet notability guidelines for WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. If significant coverage can be found, I'm willing to change my !vote. Netherzone (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I added some more refs (and looking into it made me think WP would benefit from better coverage of Islamic art in the UK).Dsp13 (talk) 18:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good find on the Tribune Express one, that has me almost convinced, but it is the only one that provides any significant coverage on the gallery in a reliable source. If we could get one or 2 more like that one then it would change my mind. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Seems to be quite notable to Islamic art in the UK which is poorly covered. At worst merge into the road article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Notable islamic art in UK. Article can be updated further. Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Weak keep''' Seems to be quite notable to Islamic art in the UK which is poorly covered. At worst merge into the road article.♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 08:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 17:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Mica Gallery]]</noinclude></p>
+*'''Weak keep''' Notable islamic art in UK. Article can be updated further. [[User:Ambrosiawater|Ambrosiawater]] ([[User talk:Ambrosiawater|talk]]) 11:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)