Talk:Neo-colonial science: Difference between revisions
→Title change: new section |
→One sided, politized polemic: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{ping|Jnyssen}} I renamed it to a broader title since there are so many competiting metaphors being used -- for international english it doesn't make sense to use one of these very specific terms that only makes sense for certain fields. Let me know if that is helpful, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 10:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC) |
{{ping|Jnyssen}} I renamed it to a broader title since there are so many competiting metaphors being used -- for international english it doesn't make sense to use one of these very specific terms that only makes sense for certain fields. Let me know if that is helpful, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 10:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
== One sided, politized polemic == |
|||
This article presents the issues raised entirely from one perspective, using highly pejorative language. There is nothing here to suggest that local scientists or academics are being prevented from conducting their own work. Rather that no one locally has done the studies until someone has come from elsewhere. The idea that Europeans are somehow stealing the funding in the example given, when the money is essentially actually coming from European taxpayers. The other example seemingly suggests that the Indonesian people are being exploited for western gain, when in fact the results of the study are published for the knowledge of all and everyone, wherever they are. If the participants are not directly benefiting, then this is no different from participants in a western medical trial for example. |
|||
Although the article may present a viewpoint held in some circles, it really needs to be much more balanced. |
Revision as of 02:10, 25 April 2023
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Title change
@Jnyssen: I renamed it to a broader title since there are so many competiting metaphors being used -- for international english it doesn't make sense to use one of these very specific terms that only makes sense for certain fields. Let me know if that is helpful, Sadads (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
One sided, politized polemic
This article presents the issues raised entirely from one perspective, using highly pejorative language. There is nothing here to suggest that local scientists or academics are being prevented from conducting their own work. Rather that no one locally has done the studies until someone has come from elsewhere. The idea that Europeans are somehow stealing the funding in the example given, when the money is essentially actually coming from European taxpayers. The other example seemingly suggests that the Indonesian people are being exploited for western gain, when in fact the results of the study are published for the knowledge of all and everyone, wherever they are. If the participants are not directly benefiting, then this is no different from participants in a western medical trial for example.
Although the article may present a viewpoint held in some circles, it really needs to be much more balanced.