Talk:Entitativity: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:41, 1 June 2023

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Social and political Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Social and political philosophy

Psychology Stub‑class

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merging whith entity

Entitativity is an important concept in social psychology, and I think it deserves its own article. I will see what I can do about expanding it. Rasputinous (talk) 13:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 June 2023

It has been proposed in this section that Entitativity be renamed and moved to Entitativity (Social Psychology).

A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Entitativity → Entitativity (Social Psychology) – "Entitativity" as a word, on first glance, seems to be a standard nominalization of the most general sense of the word entitative, which implies the page is about the ability of a concept to be considered an entity, and not specifically only the social psychological concept (as the article is now). And, due to the current stub state of the article, upon first viewing this was not immediately clear.

I've added a hatnote to clarify a bit, but think that this article should also have the clarifier "(Social Psychology)" to provide "pre-visit clarification" about what the article is about. Perhaps also, after this is done, a disambiguation hatnote pointing directly to Entity (disambiguation) would be beneficial. After reading WP:DAB, it doesn't seem to state clearly if a morphologically derived word should have clarifiers separating it from its root word, when no other articles with the exact derived word's title exist, but in this case I think it makes sense, as this article is linked from that disambiguation page, and the concepts are highly related but distinct. Brubsby (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Merging whith entity==
 Entitativity is an important concept in social psychology, and I think it deserves its own article. I will see what I can do about expanding it. [[User:Rasputinous|Rasputinous]] ([[User talk:Rasputinous|talk]]) 13:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
+== Requested move 1 June 2023 ==
+{{requested move/dated|Entitativity (Social Psychology)}}
+[[:Entitativity]] → {{no redirect|Entitativity (Social Psychology)}} – "Entitativity" as a word, on first glance, seems to be a standard nominalization of the most general sense of the word [[wikt:entitative|entitative]], which implies the page is about the ability of a concept to be considered an entity, and not specifically only the social psychological concept (as the article is now). And, due to the current stub state of the article, upon first viewing this was not immediately clear.
+I've added a hatnote to clarify a bit, but think that this article should also have the clarifier "(Social Psychology)" to provide "pre-visit clarification" about what the article is about. Perhaps also, after this is done, a disambiguation hatnote pointing directly to [[Entity (disambiguation)]] would be beneficial. After reading [[WP:DAB]], it doesn't seem to state clearly if a [[morphological derivation|morphologically derived]] word should have clarifiers separating it from its root word, when no other articles with the exact derived word's title exist, but in this case I think it makes sense, as this article is linked from that disambiguation page, and the concepts are highly related but distinct. [[User:Brubsby|Brubsby]] ([[User talk:Brubsby|talk]]) 21:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)