Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Shaw (actor) (2nd nomination)

Joe Shaw (actor)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Joe Shaw (actor)
• Articles for deletion/Joe Shaw (actor) (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Joe Shaw (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's not as abysmally sourced as the article previously deleted at AfD, but the underlying notability issue has not changed since the last AfD a few years ago. Nowhere near meeting WP:GNG, online coverage of the subject is trivial or else not independent. In principle could be redirected to Martin Shaw as {{r from child}}, but there's almost no information about Joe Shaw at that page. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete. This fails Wikipedia:Notability. Only one acceptable source exists (if another is found I'll reconsider). Here's a source assessment table:

Source assessment table: prepared by User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Joe Shaw Online	This is a primary source.	? Unclear. Probably reliable?		✘ No
Digiguide.tv	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.	?	Just a routine database entry.	✘ No
Amazon	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.		Just a routine database entry.	✘ No
Rotten Tomatoes	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.		Just a routine database entry.	✘ No
OpenDMB	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.	?	Just a routine database entry.	✘ No
Gov.uk	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.		Just a routine database entry.	✘ No
Rotten Tomatoes	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.	?	Just a routine database entry.	✘ No
MyLondon	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.	A generally credible news outlet	Just a passing mention.	✘ No
The Mirror (https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Dad%27s+fame+spoiled+my+childhood+but+being+an+actor+was+all+I+ever...-a062135390)	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.	A generally credible news outlet	An entire article.	✔ Yes
Brain Sharper	Not affiliated Joe Shaw.	? Clickbait website with unclear journalistic standards.	No. Just a brief mention alongside the rest of the cast.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

IAmHuitzilopochtli (talk) 00:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

That looks like it took a lot of effort. McFilet O' Fish Fan (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep.
  • Seems to meet WP:NACTOR with Rhodes, Bad Girls and Murder Investigation Team.
  • Seems to also meet WP:BASIC. Looking through proquest there are several different articles, including NYT[1], Chicago Tribune[2], etc [3] that have a few sentences of SIGCOV around his work in Rhodes along with his background. Additionally there is another Daily Mirror article from a different author, several years apart year that is an in-depth interview, but interspersed with independent assertions of facts about the subject [4]. Beyond that there's lots of varying coverage of subject's acting in various performances to sufficiently meet WP:BASIC.

—siroχo 03:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete per above Salted and then canned meat product (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete As above table shows, WP:GNG has not been met --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)