Jump to content

Talk:Greeks: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Greeks/Archive 12) (bot
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 62: Line 62:
}}
}}
__TOC__
__TOC__

== Incorrect population estimations. ==

The Second source ( Clogg 2013) as to the number of Greeks worldwide is unreliable, and within its composition states that the information it lists is unreliable. In addition, the figures for individual nations are erroneous and exaggerated, often different from what the source placed beside them posits.

I am not sure why Authors are trying to bloat the number of extant Greeks, but even if by only a few million, the inaccuracy erodes the trustworthiness of Wikipedia as a source of reliable information. Ed 21:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:56, 22 August 2023

Good articleGreeks has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
January 5, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 30, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
December 11, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Incorrect population estimations.

The Second source ( Clogg 2013) as to the number of Greeks worldwide is unreliable, and within its composition states that the information it lists is unreliable. In addition, the figures for individual nations are erroneous and exaggerated, often different from what the source placed beside them posits.

I am not sure why Authors are trying to bloat the number of extant Greeks, but even if by only a few million, the inaccuracy erodes the trustworthiness of Wikipedia as a source of reliable information. Ed 21:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC)