Jump to content

User talk:Sathishcm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adding sockpuppetry block notice per w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathishcm (using spihelper.js)
Sathishcm (talk | contribs)
Unblocked because I uncovered a scam
Line 309: Line 309:
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=[[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 09:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)|spi=Sathishcm|indef=yes}}
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=[[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 09:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)|spi=Sathishcm|indef=yes}}


{{unblock | reason=I posted a detailed data set (see above) of User:Wikishovel who has published 25 Biography Pages in violation with fake user profiles, as you can see above. The administrator:girth puppet without reviewing my data, marked me as a sock puppet to someone else. No justification was provided. My crime was that I uncovered a user who has used fake data to create 100s of commercial pages. If this is the way wikipedia works, how is it trust worthy?}}

Revision as of 11:15, 24 August 2023

Welcome!

Hello, Sathishcm!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 20:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb Thank you. I registered in 2007 but did not have any time to contribute till now. Retired now, and looking forward to working with you :) Sathishcm (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely; feel free to reach out with any questions! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Sathishcm (talk) 22:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Data

ADD Sathishcm (talk) 02:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

To create a table Sathishcm (talk) 02:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page Min time between edits Timeline Link Type of Page Created By Edits by Creator on Page Total Edits in Wikipedia by Creator Edits by Wikishovel on Page
Devon Larratt 11 minutes 11 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Robzuuu 3 3 4
Gavin Garrison 4 minutes 4 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Gavingarrison 6 9 2
Abubakar Inuwa Tata 58 seconds 58 seconds — (timeline) Biography of living person YusufuAM 12 121 12
Utpal Bhadra 9 minutes 9 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person TEJPandita 3 5 6
Elliot Madore 5 minutes 5 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Elliotmadore 1 3 5
Angelo Montrone 57 seconds 57 seconds — (timeline) Biography of living person Kensington123 4 4 3
Shingi Munyeza 51 seconds 51 seconds — (timeline) Biography of living person MuzukuruWedza 15 35 4
Brian Tracy 8 minutes 8 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person I are me 6 11 1
Smarn Muntarbhorn 1 minute 1 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Lukesahota 5 65 2
Mandeep Benipal 6 minutes 6 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person TrendyDeepSingh 3 6 2
Benjamin Lazar Davis 2 minutes 2 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Simplymarvellous 1 39 12
Colin Mark 11 minutes 11 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Cliffmark99 51 273 2
Ike McFadden 29 seconds 29 seconds — (timeline) Biography of living person Louisawalton 12 23 11
Alex Kazemi 2 hours 2 hours — (timeline) Biography of living person Dl.der 19 19 2
Karin Hansson 1 minutes 1 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Kaihanhan 9 34 8
Dana LaCroix 10 minutes 10 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Lovingtheroots 73 90 1
Nevzat Aydin 4 minutes 4 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Ceylanhunal 4 56 1
Prasanna Pattnaik 3 minutes 3 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person BPatnaik 32 41 2
Moayad Shatat 36 minutes 36 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person AntonioFernández1923 10 11 1
Lotfi Achour 21 minutes 21 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Bent eddar 7 21 1
Phyllis Ntantala-Jordan 11 minutes 11 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Hombakazi denge 4 4 4
Frank Wilson (journalist) 1 minutes 1 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Quantumman98 20 28 5
Tyler Cassel 12 minutes 12 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Luca123451 2 2 2
Juspreet Singh Walia 3 minutes 3 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person PreetiYFL 58 65 4
Perry Hills 2 minutes 2 minutes — (timeline) Biography of living person Tacotuesday7 8 50 1

Sathishcm (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathishcm. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 09:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sathishcm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I posted a detailed data set (see above) of User:Wikishovel who has published 25 Biography Pages in violation with fake user profiles, as you can see above. The administrator:girth puppet without reviewing my data, marked me as a sock puppet to someone else. No justification was provided. My crime was that I uncovered a user who has used fake data to create 100s of commercial pages. If this is the way wikipedia works, how is it trust worthy?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I posted a detailed data set (see above) of User:Wikishovel who has published 25 Biography Pages in violation with fake user profiles, as you can see above. The administrator:girth puppet without reviewing my data, marked me as a sock puppet to someone else. No justification was provided. My crime was that I uncovered a user who has used fake data to create 100s of commercial pages. If this is the way wikipedia works, how is it trust worthy? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I posted a detailed data set (see above) of User:Wikishovel who has published 25 Biography Pages in violation with fake user profiles, as you can see above. The administrator:girth puppet without reviewing my data, marked me as a sock puppet to someone else. No justification was provided. My crime was that I uncovered a user who has used fake data to create 100s of commercial pages. If this is the way wikipedia works, how is it trust worthy? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I posted a detailed data set (see above) of User:Wikishovel who has published 25 Biography Pages in violation with fake user profiles, as you can see above. The administrator:girth puppet without reviewing my data, marked me as a sock puppet to someone else. No justification was provided. My crime was that I uncovered a user who has used fake data to create 100s of commercial pages. If this is the way wikipedia works, how is it trust worthy? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}