Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Roman lettering: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Decided to remove the image-editing the template would be too complicated at this late stage.
FlairTale (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
:{{u|FlairTale}}, thanks for the kind review! I think the key word is "official" e.g. in Baines' comment: it was certainly a standard for "official" contexts (post office signs, church noticeboards, war memorials) but plenty of other styles were common on business signs. How about "was popular for official use"? I've made that ALT1. [[User:Blythwood|Blythwood]] ([[User talk:Blythwood|talk]])
:{{u|FlairTale}}, thanks for the kind review! I think the key word is "official" e.g. in Baines' comment: it was certainly a standard for "official" contexts (post office signs, church noticeboards, war memorials) but plenty of other styles were common on business signs. How about "was popular for official use"? I've made that ALT1. [[User:Blythwood|Blythwood]] ([[User talk:Blythwood|talk]])
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
::{{u|Blythwood}} "was popular for official use" sounds great! [[User:FlairTale|FlairTale]] ([[User talk:FlairTale|talk]]) 04:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:15, 11 September 2023

Roman lettering

  • ... that Roman or Trajan lettering was popular in Britain in the first half of the twentieth century? Source: Nicolete Gray: "In Britain in the twentieth century it was taught in all art schools, promoted in many books, and officially sponsored by the then Ministry of Works...I shall refer to this letter as ‘Trajan’.", John Nash: "The Roman inscriptional capital thrived...in early twentieth century England" (p. 11), "lettering manuals proliferated, each with its V & A photo of the Trajan letters" (p. 19) "a tradition of fine classically-inspired carved lettering which virtually didn’t exist at the beginning of the century [was] firmly established in England by the 1940s" (p. 22). Baines (photo visible here, the last photo) "standard form of official lettering"

Created by Blythwood (talk). Self-nominated at 12:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Roman lettering; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Blythwood Very well written article, passes all criteria. The hook is interesting enough, I just wonder if "was popular in Britain in the first half of the twentieth century" could be better worded as something like "became the standard lettering style in Britain in the first half of the twentieth century" because it doesn't seem clear what popularity means. FlairTale (talk) 06:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

FlairTale, thanks for the kind review! I think the key word is "official" e.g. in Baines' comment: it was certainly a standard for "official" contexts (post office signs, church noticeboards, war memorials) but plenty of other styles were common on business signs. How about "was popular for official use"? I've made that ALT1. Blythwood (talk)
Blythwood "was popular for official use" sounds great! FlairTale (talk) 04:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)