Talk:Telepathy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:51, 26 December 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Telepathy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Paranormal C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parapsychology C‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Skepticism C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Otheus, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 April 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience

In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:

Neutral point of view as applied to science: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to pseudoscience.
Serious encyclopedias: Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as Time Cube, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more justification.
Generally considered pseudoscience: Theories which have a following, such as astrology, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such as psychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
Alternative theoretical formulations: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

"Tapping into oneness" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tapping into oneness has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Tapping into oneness until a consensus is reached. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question

Hello, I have a question about telepathy for my book I am writing "The Moon and Stars" You see, my brother had given me an idea when he said that telepaths can put images in peoples mind, but I had protested and said it was an illusionist that can do that. But ever since then the question had haunted my mind, CAN telepaths put images in different people's minds? You need not rush into the answer for this, but it would prove quite useful if you did.

Happy Holidays,

Cloverpool of Riverclan 76.145.181.225 (talk) 04:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 [[File:Information.svg|30px]]
 The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tapping_into_oneness&redirect=no Tapping into oneness]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31#Tapping into oneness}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Rui Gabriel Correia|Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia]] ([[User talk:Rui Gabriel Correia|talk]]) 09:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
+== I have a question ==
+Hello, I have a question about telepathy for my book I am writing "The Moon and Stars"
+You see, my brother had given me an idea when he said that telepaths can put images in peoples mind, but I had protested and said it was an illusionist that can do that. But ever since then the question had haunted my mind, CAN telepaths put images in different people's minds? You need not rush into the answer for this, but it would prove quite useful if you did.
+Happy Holidays,
+Cloverpool of Riverclan [[Special:Contributions/76.145.181.225|76.145.181.225]] ([[User talk:76.145.181.225|talk]]) 04:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)