Jump to content

Draft:Vincent Blok: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Declining submission: v - Submission is improperly sourced and npov - Submission is not written in a formal, neutral encyclopedic tone (AFCH)
Thank you for the feedback. Because I received several calls for more reliable sources, It may indeed have resulted in peacock terms. I have removed these part, but it is not completely clear why even more reliable sources are needed (I compared this entry with Peter Paul Verbeek and Yuk Hui as reference entries. Almost all sentence in the entry is supported now by verifiable sources, so I hope we can now publish and/or provide specific points were additional sources are needed
Line 17: Line 17:
{{AfC topic|blp}}
{{AfC topic|blp}}


'''Vincent Blok''' (born 30 July 1970, in Scheveningen) is professor at the [[Wageningen University & Research|Wageningen University]], specialised in philosophy of technology, environmental philosophy and responsible innovation<ref>{{Cite web |date=2012-09-04 |title=prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok |url=https://www.wur.nl/en/persons/vincent-prof.dr.-v-vincent-blok.htm |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=WUR |language=en-us}}</ref>, scientific director of the 4TU Centre for Ethics of Technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=ABOUT US {{!}} 4TUEthics |url=https://ethicsandtechnology.eu/about-us |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=ethicsandtechnology.eu}}</ref>, a collaboration of the four Technical Universities in the Netherlands, and project leader of the AI for Sustainable Food Systems laboratory, that researches the ethical, legal and social aspets (ELSA) of AI<ref>{{Cite web |last=Heer |first=Marloes de |title=home |url=https://www.ai4sfs.org/ |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=ELSA {{!}} AI for Sustainable Food Systems |language=en-gb}}</ref>. In his research, Blok reflects on the meaning of contemporary disruptive events like digitalisation and global warming for the human condition and its environment from a continental philosophical perspective.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Blok |first=Vincent |date=2012-09-04 |title=prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok |url=https://www.wur.nl/en/persons/vincent-prof.dr.-v-vincent-blok.htm |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=WUR |language=en-us}}</ref> He is one of the highest cited philosophers in the field of philosophy<ref>{{Cite web |last=Index |first=AD Scientific |title=Vincent Blok - AD Scientific Index 2024 |url=https://www.adscientificindex.com/scientist/vincent-blok/4306402 |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=www.adscientificindex.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Vincent Blok |url=https://scholar.google.nl/citations?hl=en&user=sW-5JbYAAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&view_op=list_works&gmla=AH70aAUgOuQdwPBdHhrkToFIJtxgT0TvEtksUTJENBCWDrcifV1VMa8hdXaxzhRWoYz4gi7Q7sqgx62IGjrA_4E_ |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=scholar.google.nl}}</ref> and his work has significant impact<ref>{{Cite web |title=vincent blok - Zoekresultaten |url=https://search.worldcat.org/nl/search?q=vincent+blok&author=Blok+Vincent&quickLink=book&itemSubType=book-printbook,book-digital&itemSubTypeModified=book-printbook,book-digital |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=search.worldcat.org}}</ref> in the field of philosophy of technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=Profiles |url=https://scholar.google.nl/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:philosophy_of_technology |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=scholar.google.nl}}</ref>, continental philosophy<ref>{{Cite web |title=Profiles |url=https://scholar.google.nl/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:continental_philosophy |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=scholar.google.nl}}</ref>, environmental philosophy<ref>{{Cite web |title=Profiles |url=https://scholar.google.nl/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:environmental_philosophy |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=scholar.google.nl}}</ref> and responsible innovation<ref>{{Cite web |title=Profiles |url=https://scholar.google.nl/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:responsible_innovation |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=scholar.google.nl}}</ref>. Further, he contributes to academic debates in his field in his position as member of the boad of the Society for Philosopohy and Technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=SPT Board – SPT |url=https://www.spt.org/spt-board/ |access-date=2024-01-06 |language=en-US}}</ref> and as associate editor of various academic journals, such as Philosophy & Technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=Philosophy & Technology |url=https://www.springer.com/journal/13347/editors |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=Springer |language=en}}</ref>, Journal of Responsible Innovation<ref>{{Cite web |title=Journal of Responsible Innovation |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=tjri20}}</ref> and Philosophy of Management<ref>{{Cite web |title=Philosophy of Management |url=https://link.springer.com/journal/40926/editors |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=SpringerLink |language=en}}</ref>. Blok's philosophy of technology has been described as "One of the most daring attempts to think through the general impact of technology".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ritter |first=Martin |date=2023-04-11 |title=Towards a Terrestrially Ontological Philosophy of Technology |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x |journal=Foundations of Science |language=en |doi=10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x |issn=1572-8471}}</ref>
'''Vincent Blok''' (born 30 July 1970, in Scheveningen) is professor at the [[Wageningen University & Research|Wageningen University]], specialised in philosophy of technology, environmental philosophy and responsible innovation<ref>{{Cite web |date=2012-09-04 |title=prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok |url=https://www.wur.nl/en/persons/vincent-prof.dr.-v-vincent-blok.htm |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=WUR |language=en-us}}</ref>, scientific director of the 4TU Centre for Ethics of Technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=ABOUT US {{!}} 4TUEthics |url=https://ethicsandtechnology.eu/about-us |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=ethicsandtechnology.eu}}</ref>, a collaboration of the four Technical Universities in the Netherlands, and project leader of the AI for Sustainable Food Systems laboratory, that researches the ethical, legal and social aspets (ELSA) of AI<ref>{{Cite web |last=Heer |first=Marloes de |title=home |url=https://www.ai4sfs.org/ |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=ELSA {{!}} AI for Sustainable Food Systems |language=en-gb}}</ref>. In his research, Blok reflects on the meaning of contemporary disruptive events like digitalisation and global warming for the human condition and its environment from a continental philosophical perspective.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Blok |first=Vincent |date=2012-09-04 |title=prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok |url=https://www.wur.nl/en/persons/vincent-prof.dr.-v-vincent-blok.htm |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=WUR |language=en-us}}</ref> He is also member of the boad of the Society for Philosopohy and Technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=SPT Board – SPT |url=https://www.spt.org/spt-board/ |access-date=2024-01-06 |language=en-US}}</ref> and associate editor of various academic journals, such as Philosophy & Technology<ref>{{Cite web |title=Philosophy & Technology |url=https://www.springer.com/journal/13347/editors |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=Springer |language=en}}</ref>, Journal of Responsible Innovation<ref>{{Cite web |title=Journal of Responsible Innovation |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=editorialBoard&journalCode=tjri20}}</ref> and Philosophy of Management<ref>{{Cite web |title=Philosophy of Management |url=https://link.springer.com/journal/40926/editors |access-date=2024-01-06 |website=SpringerLink |language=en}}</ref>. Blok's philosophy of technology has been described as "One of the most daring attempts to think through the general impact of technology".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ritter |first=Martin |date=2023-04-11 |title=Towards a Terrestrially Ontological Philosophy of Technology |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x |journal=Foundations of Science |language=en |doi=10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x |issn=1572-8471}}</ref>


== Education ==
== Education ==
Blok studied philosophy with a.o [[:nl:Wouter_Oudemans|Wouter Oudemans]], [[:nl:Gerard_Visser|Gerard Visser]] and [[:nl:Herman_Philipse|Herman Philipse]] at Leiden University. He wrote his doctoral thesis on the philosophical method of [[Martin Heidegger]] and [[Ernst Jünger]], under the supervision of [[:nl:Wouter_Oudemans|Wouter Oudemans]], and obtained his PhD in 2005. From 2006-2010, Blok was CEO of the [https://louisbolk.nl/ Louis Bolk Institute], a research institute in the field of sustainable agriculture, nutrition and health care.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-07-12 |title=About |url=https://vincentblok.nl/about/ |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=vincentblok.nl |language=en}}</ref>
Blok studied philosophy with a.o [[:nl:Wouter_Oudemans|Wouter Oudemans]], [[:nl:Gerard_Visser|Gerard Visser]] and [[:nl:Herman_Philipse|Herman Philipse]] at Leiden University. He wrote his doctoral thesis on the philosophical method of [[Martin Heidegger]] and [[Ernst Jünger]], under the supervision of [[:nl:Wouter_Oudemans|Wouter Oudemans]], and obtained his PhD in 2005.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Leiden University: https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/2723 |url=https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/2723}}</ref> From 2006-2010, Blok was CEO of the [https://louisbolk.nl/ Louis Bolk Institute], a research institute in the field of sustainable agriculture, nutrition and health care.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-07-12 |title=About |url=https://vincentblok.nl/about/ |access-date=2024-01-05 |website=vincentblok.nl |language=en}}</ref>


== Theories and Methods ==
== Theories and Methods ==
Blok works on the intersection between philosophy of technology and philosophical method. His dissertation, published in 2005, tried to answer the question how philosophers can reflect on the age of technology if their own way of doing philosophy is already affected by technology.<ref name=":0" /> To answer this question, he studied the philosophy of technology of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger. In the following years, he wrote a monograph on the philosophy of technolog of Ernst Jünger (2017)<ref name=":1" /> and on Heidegger's philosophical method (2019)<ref name=":2" />. Later he became more critical about Heidegger's conceptualization of the technological world as a reservoir of resources that is present for exploitation, as it overlooks the role of concrete disruptive innovations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blok |first=Vincent |date=2023-09-01 |title=The Ontology of Technology Beyond Anthropocentrism and Determinism: The Role of Technologies in the Constitution of the (post)Anthropocene World |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1 |journal=Foundations of Science |language=en |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=987–1005 |doi=10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1 |issn=1572-8471}}</ref> At the same time, he was critical about the pure focus on artefacts and practices in many contemporary philosophies of technology. They miss that new artefacts like AI driven applications are embedded in a particular ontological structure of the World. In order to integrate both perspectives, he developed a concept of ecological hermeneutic phenomenology that considers both the physical level of new technologies - the innovation process leading to the emergence of new disruptive technologies - and the meta-physical level of the ontological structure of the World in which these technologies are embedded.<ref name=":3" />
Blok works on the intersection between philosophy of technology and philosophical method. His dissertation, published in 2005, tried to answer the question how philosophers can reflect on the age of technology if their own way of doing philosophy is already affected by technology.<ref name=":0" /> To answer this question, he studied the philosophy of technology of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger. In the following years, he wrote a monograph on the philosophy of technolog of Ernst Jünger (2017)<ref name=":1" />, which gained broad academic interest because "there is a paucity of English-language secondary literature on Jünger, and little of that literature is of direct philosophical interest<ref>{{Cite journal |date=2018 |title=Philosophical Perspectives on Meaning in Literature and Life |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0611001 |journal=International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature |volume=6 |issue=11 |doi=10.20431/2347-3134.0611001 |issn=2347-3134}}</ref>. Subsequently, here wrote a monograph on Heidegger's philosophical method (2019)<ref name=":2" />, that "offers an impressive and, in all likelihood, sustainable contribution to the discourse on method in contemporary philosophy".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Reijers |first=Wessel |date=2021-03-01 |title=Blok, Vincent: Heidegger’s concept of philosophical method: innovating philosophy in the age of global warming |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-020-09513-w |journal=Continental Philosophy Review |language=en |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=99–106 |doi=10.1007/s11007-020-09513-w |issn=1573-1103}}</ref> Later he became more critical about Heidegger's conceptualization of the technological world as a reservoir of resources that is present for exploitation, as it overlooks the role of concrete disruptive innovations.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blok |first=Vincent |date=2023-09-01 |title=The Ontology of Technology Beyond Anthropocentrism and Determinism: The Role of Technologies in the Constitution of the (post)Anthropocene World |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1 |journal=Foundations of Science |language=en |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=987–1005 |doi=10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1 |issn=1572-8471}}</ref> At the same time, he was critical about the pure focus on artefacts and practices in many contemporary philosophies of technology. They miss that new artefacts like AI driven applications are embedded in a particular ontological structure of the World. In order to integrate both perspectives, he developed a concept of ecological hermeneutic phenomenology that considers both the physical level of new technologies - the innovation process leading to the emergence of new disruptive technologies - and the meta-physical level of the ontological structure of the World in which these technologies are embedded.<ref name=":3" />


In this context, he also developed a philosophy of innovation to broaden the concept of technology and consider the process-dimension of technological evolution next to the outcome-dimension of innovation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blok |first=Vincent |date=2021 |title=What Is Innovation? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation |url=https://www.pdcnet.org/8525763B0050E6F8/file/03B05EE1DCD84D5685258600004A8229/$FILE/techne_2021_0025_0001_0073_0097.pdf |journal=Techne |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=72–96}}</ref> In his current work, he researchers how [[biomimetics]] can provide a new paradigm for sustainable technology development<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Blok |first1=Vincent |last2=Gremmen |first2=Bart |date=2016-04-01 |title=Ecological Innovation: Biomimicry as a New Way of Thinking and Acting Ecologically |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1 |journal=Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics |language=en |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=203–217 |doi=10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1 |issn=1573-322X}}</ref> in the [[Anthropocene]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Blok |first1=Vincent |last2=Philosophy Documentation Center |date=2017 |title=Earthing Technology: Toward an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene |url=http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=techne_2017_0021_42769_0127_0149&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection |journal=Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=127–149 |doi=10.5840/techne201752363 |issn=2691-5928}}</ref>.
In this context, he also developed a philosophy of innovation to broaden the concept of technology and consider the process-dimension of technological evolution next to the outcome-dimension of innovation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Blok |first=Vincent |date=2021 |title=What Is Innovation? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation |url=https://www.pdcnet.org/8525763B0050E6F8/file/03B05EE1DCD84D5685258600004A8229/$FILE/techne_2021_0025_0001_0073_0097.pdf |journal=Techne |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=72–96}}</ref> He also opened a philosophical perspective on [[Biomimetics|biomimicry]] as a new paradigm of sustainable technology<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Blok |first1=Vincent |last2=Gremmen |first2=Bart |date=2016-04-01 |title=Ecological Innovation: Biomimicry as a New Way of Thinking and Acting Ecologically |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1 |journal=Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics |language=en |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=203–217 |doi=10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1 |issn=1573-322X}}</ref> in the [[Anthropocene]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Blok |first1=Vincent |last2=Philosophy Documentation Center |date=2017 |title=Earthing Technology: Toward an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene |url=http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=techne_2017_0021_42769_0127_0149&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection |journal=Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=127–149 |doi=10.5840/techne201752363 |issn=2691-5928}}</ref>, that contributed to the further development of philosophy of ''sustainable'' technology.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Zwart |first=Hub |date=2017-06-08 |title=From the Nadir of Negativity towards the Cusp of Reconciliation: A Dialectical (Hegelian-Teilhardian) Assessment of the Anthropocenic Challenge |url=https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=techne&id=techne_2017_0999_6_5_65 |journal=Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology |language=en |doi=10.5840/techne20176565}}</ref>


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==
Line 44: Line 44:


=== Articles ===
=== Articles ===
Blok published over twohundred papers and chapters in philosophy journals like ''Philosophy & Technology, Environmental Philosophy, Heidegger Studies'', ''Synthese'' and ''JBSP,'' and in multi-disciplinary journals like ''Journal of Responsible Innovation, Science,'' and ''Public understanding of Science''. Most of his papers are published open access and available via [https://wur.academia.edu/VincentBlok Academia] or [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vincent-Blok Researchgate]
Blok published numerous articles that are published open access and available via [https://wur.academia.edu/VincentBlok Academia] or [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vincent-Blok Researchgate]


== External links ==
== External links ==

Revision as of 11:55, 19 February 2024

  • Comment: An article requires multiple reliable, third-party or independent sources that write about the subject, see WP:IS. The present article has maybe one - the first one. The remainder is WP:CITEKILL and WP:RESUME. I am pretty sure prof. Blok is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, but this article does not prove it and does not have the right tone. About tone, see WP:EPSTYLE. The lede section for example is too long. The phrase about one of the most daring attempts seems to be the blurb from one of Blok´s books. That is not neutral and dispassionate. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 01:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Vincent Blok (born 30 July 1970, in Scheveningen) is professor at the Wageningen University, specialised in philosophy of technology, environmental philosophy and responsible innovation[1], scientific director of the 4TU Centre for Ethics of Technology[2], a collaboration of the four Technical Universities in the Netherlands, and project leader of the AI for Sustainable Food Systems laboratory, that researches the ethical, legal and social aspets (ELSA) of AI[3]. In his research, Blok reflects on the meaning of contemporary disruptive events like digitalisation and global warming for the human condition and its environment from a continental philosophical perspective.[4] He is also member of the boad of the Society for Philosopohy and Technology[5] and associate editor of various academic journals, such as Philosophy & Technology[6], Journal of Responsible Innovation[7] and Philosophy of Management[8]. Blok's philosophy of technology has been described as "One of the most daring attempts to think through the general impact of technology".[9]

Education

Blok studied philosophy with a.o Wouter Oudemans, Gerard Visser and Herman Philipse at Leiden University. He wrote his doctoral thesis on the philosophical method of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger, under the supervision of Wouter Oudemans, and obtained his PhD in 2005.[10] From 2006-2010, Blok was CEO of the Louis Bolk Institute, a research institute in the field of sustainable agriculture, nutrition and health care.[11]

Theories and Methods

Blok works on the intersection between philosophy of technology and philosophical method. His dissertation, published in 2005, tried to answer the question how philosophers can reflect on the age of technology if their own way of doing philosophy is already affected by technology.[12] To answer this question, he studied the philosophy of technology of Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger. In the following years, he wrote a monograph on the philosophy of technolog of Ernst Jünger (2017)[13], which gained broad academic interest because "there is a paucity of English-language secondary literature on Jünger, and little of that literature is of direct philosophical interest[14]. Subsequently, here wrote a monograph on Heidegger's philosophical method (2019)[15], that "offers an impressive and, in all likelihood, sustainable contribution to the discourse on method in contemporary philosophy".[16] Later he became more critical about Heidegger's conceptualization of the technological world as a reservoir of resources that is present for exploitation, as it overlooks the role of concrete disruptive innovations.[17] At the same time, he was critical about the pure focus on artefacts and practices in many contemporary philosophies of technology. They miss that new artefacts like AI driven applications are embedded in a particular ontological structure of the World. In order to integrate both perspectives, he developed a concept of ecological hermeneutic phenomenology that considers both the physical level of new technologies - the innovation process leading to the emergence of new disruptive technologies - and the meta-physical level of the ontological structure of the World in which these technologies are embedded.[18]

In this context, he also developed a philosophy of innovation to broaden the concept of technology and consider the process-dimension of technological evolution next to the outcome-dimension of innovation.[19] He also opened a philosophical perspective on biomimicry as a new paradigm of sustainable technology[20] in the Anthropocene[21], that contributed to the further development of philosophy of sustainable technology.[22]

Bibliography

Books in English

- Blok, V. (2017), Ernst Jünger’s Philosophy of Technology. Heidegger and the Poetics of the Anthropocene (Routledge)[13]

- Blok, V. (2019), Heidegger’s Concept of philosophical Method (Routledge)[15]

- Blok, V. (2021), The Critique of Management. Toward a Philosophy and Ethics of Business Management (Routledge)[23]

- Blok, V. (2023), Philosophy of Technology in the Digital Age. The datafication of the World, the homo virtualis, and the capacity of technological innovations to set the World free (Wageningen University)[18]

Books in Dutch

- Blok, V. (2005), Rondom de vloedlijn. Filosofie en kunst in het machinale tijdperk. Een confrontatie tussen Heidegger en Jünger (Aspect)[12]

- Blok, V. (2022), Van wereld naar aarde. Filosofische ecologie van een bedreigde planeet (Boom, in Dutch).[24]

Articles

Blok published numerous articles that are published open access and available via Academia or Researchgate

Personal website

References

  1. ^ "prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok". WUR. 2012-09-04. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
  2. ^ "ABOUT US | 4TUEthics". ethicsandtechnology.eu. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
  3. ^ Heer, Marloes de. "home". ELSA | AI for Sustainable Food Systems. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
  4. ^ Blok, Vincent (2012-09-04). "prof.dr. V (Vincent) Blok". WUR. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
  5. ^ "SPT Board – SPT". Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  6. ^ "Philosophy & Technology". Springer. Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  7. ^ "Journal of Responsible Innovation".
  8. ^ "Philosophy of Management". SpringerLink. Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  9. ^ Ritter, Martin (2023-04-11). "Towards a Terrestrially Ontological Philosophy of Technology". Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x. ISSN 1572-8471.
  10. ^ "Leiden University: https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/2723". {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  11. ^ "About". vincentblok.nl. 2021-07-12. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
  12. ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2005). Rondom de Vloedlijn: filosofie en kunst in het machinale tijdperk; een confrontatie tussen Heidegger en Jünger. Soesterberg, NL: Uitg. Aspekt. ISBN 978-90-5911-102-8.
  13. ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2017). Ernst Jünger's Philosophy of Technology: Heidegger and the Poetics of the Anthropocene. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781138737594. Retrieved 2024-01-05. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  14. ^ "Philosophical Perspectives on Meaning in Literature and Life". International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature. 6 (11). 2018. doi:10.20431/2347-3134.0611001. ISSN 2347-3134.
  15. ^ a b Blok, Vincent (2020). Heidegger's concept of philosophical method: innovating philosophy in the age of global warming. Routledge studies in twentieth-century philosophy. New York London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-367-41812-0.
  16. ^ Reijers, Wessel (2021-03-01). "Blok, Vincent: Heidegger's concept of philosophical method: innovating philosophy in the age of global warming". Continental Philosophy Review. 54 (1): 99–106. doi:10.1007/s11007-020-09513-w. ISSN 1573-1103.
  17. ^ Blok, Vincent (2023-09-01). "The Ontology of Technology Beyond Anthropocentrism and Determinism: The Role of Technologies in the Constitution of the (post)Anthropocene World". Foundations of Science. 28 (3): 987–1005. doi:10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1. ISSN 1572-8471.
  18. ^ a b Philosophy of technology in the digital age: the datafication of the world, the homo virtualis, and the capacity of technological innovations to set the world free. ISBN 9789464479126.
  19. ^ Blok, Vincent (2021). "What Is Innovation? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation" (PDF). Techne. 25 (1): 72–96.
  20. ^ Blok, Vincent; Gremmen, Bart (2016-04-01). "Ecological Innovation: Biomimicry as a New Way of Thinking and Acting Ecologically". Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 29 (2): 203–217. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1. ISSN 1573-322X.
  21. ^ Blok, Vincent; Philosophy Documentation Center (2017). "Earthing Technology: Toward an Eco-centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene". Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. 21 (2): 127–149. doi:10.5840/techne201752363. ISSN 2691-5928.
  22. ^ Zwart, Hub (2017-06-08). "From the Nadir of Negativity towards the Cusp of Reconciliation: A Dialectical (Hegelian-Teilhardian) Assessment of the Anthropocenic Challenge". Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. doi:10.5840/techne20176565.
  23. ^ Blok, Vincent (2022). The critique of management: toward a philosophy and ethics of business management. New York, NY London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-032-14000-1.
  24. ^ Blok, Vincent (2022). Van wereld naar aarde. Filosofische ecologie van een bedreigde planeet. ISBN 9789024445042.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Vincent_Blok&oldid=1208899036"