Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kouichirou Itou: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Kouichirou Itou: Reply |
→Kouichirou Itou: Reply |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:@[[User:Discospinster|Discospinster]] If this is the case, feel free to delete. [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 06:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
:@[[User:Discospinster|Discospinster]] If this is the case, feel free to delete. [[User:ISD|ISD]] ([[User talk:ISD|talk]]) 06:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
:This is clearly not the case. Just because someone is accused of a crime (mind you, he is not convicted) does not you can debase their credibility entirely. There are many articles describing the notability of this individual; but they're being ignored simply because he was accused of committing a crime. I see extreme editorial bias here. This article needs to stay. [[Special:Contributions/146.229.255.21|146.229.255.21]] ([[User talk:146.229.255.21|talk]]) 19:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:15, 26 February 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kouichirou Itou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability except for being arrested for sex offences, which is not in itself a criterion of notability per WP:BIO. ... discospinster talk 20:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. ... discospinster talk 20:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Crime. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Discospinster If this is the case, feel free to delete. ISD (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is clearly not the case. Just because someone is accused of a crime (mind you, he is not convicted) does not you can debase their credibility entirely. There are many articles describing the notability of this individual; but they're being ignored simply because he was accused of committing a crime. I see extreme editorial bias here. This article needs to stay. 146.229.255.21 (talk) 19:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)