Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kouichirou Itou: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Kouichirou Itou: Reply |
→Kouichirou Itou: Reply |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*This is clearly not the case. Just because someone is accused of a crime (mind you, he is not convicted) does not you can debase their credibility entirely. There are many articles describing the notability of this individual; but they're being ignored simply because he was accused of committing a crime. I see extreme editorial bias here. This article needs to stay. [[Special:Contributions/146.229.255.21|146.229.255.21]] ([[User talk:146.229.255.21|talk]]) 19:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
*This is clearly not the case. Just because someone is accused of a crime (mind you, he is not convicted) does not you can debase their credibility entirely. There are many articles describing the notability of this individual; but they're being ignored simply because he was accused of committing a crime. I see extreme editorial bias here. This article needs to stay. [[Special:Contributions/146.229.255.21|146.229.255.21]] ([[User talk:146.229.255.21|talk]]) 19:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
**'''Comment''': You are free to add information to the article that speaks to his [[WP:NBIO|notability]] beyond being accused of a crime. That is in fact the point here: if there is nothing in the article except the fact that he's been arrested (not convicted), then the article should not stay due to violations of the [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons guidelines]]. If the article is deleted it can always be recreated in line with Wikipedia's policies. <span style="color:DarkGray">...</span> [[User:discospinster|<span style="color:DarkOrange">'''disco'''</span><span style="color: #556B2F">'''''spinster'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:discospinster|'''<span style="color:DarkGray">talk</span>''']]</sub> 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
**'''Comment''': You are free to add information to the article that speaks to his [[WP:NBIO|notability]] beyond being accused of a crime. That is in fact the point here: if there is nothing in the article except the fact that he's been arrested (not convicted), then the article should not stay due to violations of the [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons guidelines]]. If the article is deleted it can always be recreated in line with Wikipedia's policies. <span style="color:DarkGray">...</span> [[User:discospinster|<span style="color:DarkOrange">'''disco'''</span><span style="color: #556B2F">'''''spinster'''''</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:discospinster|'''<span style="color:DarkGray">talk</span>''']]</sub> 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
**:You would consider doing a better job as editor; you're clearly bias. This wasn't hard to dig up. |
|||
**:https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/aacta-org/Uploads/All-Winners-by-Category-7th-AACTA-Awards-Presented-by-Foxtel.pdf |
|||
**:7TH AACTA AWARDS PRESENTED BY FOXTEL All Winners – by Category |
|||
**:YOUR NAME: Genki Kawamura, Katsuhiro Takei, KOUICHIROU ITOU, Yoshihiro Furusawa |
|||
**:You are actively debasing wikipedia itself as a credible source of reliable information because you are trying to wipe notable people away from history because of an accusation; at someone who has not been convicted. Unfortunately, this is not hard to see. Tis the season for revisionist history? [[Special:Contributions/45.45.17.170|45.45.17.170]] ([[User talk:45.45.17.170|talk]]) 01:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{canvassed|1=|2=https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/s/Gtidr8Lfsh}} — '''[[user:fourthords|<span style="color:#CC0000">Fourthords</span>]] | [[user talk:fourthords|=Λ=]] |''' 20:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
* {{canvassed|1=|2=https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/s/Gtidr8Lfsh}} — '''[[user:fourthords|<span style="color:#CC0000">Fourthords</span>]] | [[user talk:fourthords|=Λ=]] |''' 20:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' as failing [[Wikipedia:Notability]] & [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event]]. — '''[[user:fourthords|<span style="color:#CC0000">Fourthords</span>]] | [[user talk:fourthords|=Λ=]] |''' 20:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' as failing [[Wikipedia:Notability]] & [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event]]. — '''[[user:fourthords|<span style="color:#CC0000">Fourthords</span>]] | [[user talk:fourthords|=Λ=]] |''' 20:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:32, 27 February 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kouichirou Itou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability except for being arrested for sex offences, which is not in itself a criterion of notability per WP:BIO. ... discospinster talk 20:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. ... discospinster talk 20:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Crime. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Discospinster If this is the case, feel free to delete. ISD (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is clearly not the case. Just because someone is accused of a crime (mind you, he is not convicted) does not you can debase their credibility entirely. There are many articles describing the notability of this individual; but they're being ignored simply because he was accused of committing a crime. I see extreme editorial bias here. This article needs to stay. 146.229.255.21 (talk) 19:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You are free to add information to the article that speaks to his notability beyond being accused of a crime. That is in fact the point here: if there is nothing in the article except the fact that he's been arrested (not convicted), then the article should not stay due to violations of the biographies of living persons guidelines. If the article is deleted it can always be recreated in line with Wikipedia's policies. ... discospinster talk 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- You would consider doing a better job as editor; you're clearly bias. This wasn't hard to dig up.
- https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/aacta-org/Uploads/All-Winners-by-Category-7th-AACTA-Awards-Presented-by-Foxtel.pdf
- 7TH AACTA AWARDS PRESENTED BY FOXTEL All Winners – by Category
- YOUR NAME: Genki Kawamura, Katsuhiro Takei, KOUICHIROU ITOU, Yoshihiro Furusawa
- You are actively debasing wikipedia itself as a credible source of reliable information because you are trying to wipe notable people away from history because of an accusation; at someone who has not been convicted. Unfortunately, this is not hard to see. Tis the season for revisionist history? 45.45.17.170 (talk) 01:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You are free to add information to the article that speaks to his notability beyond being accused of a crime. That is in fact the point here: if there is nothing in the article except the fact that he's been arrested (not convicted), then the article should not stay due to violations of the biographies of living persons guidelines. If the article is deleted it can always be recreated in line with Wikipedia's policies. ... discospinster talk 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- — Note: An editor has expressed a concern that editors have been canvassed to this discussion. (diff) — Fourthords | =Λ= | 20:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as failing Wikipedia:Notability & Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 20:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't see coverage about him in Japanese news sources, or in anything really. I don't see notability at this time, not meeting notability for criminals (hasn't even been convicted yet). Oaktree b (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- "I don't see coverage about him in Japanese news sources"
- If you have the data (logs) at your search at Japanese media, please put it in. Even without your input; I will hereby succinctly prove his nobility using a single source.
- [1]https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/aacta-org/Uploads/All-Winners-by-Category-7th-AACTA-Awards-Presented-by-Foxtel.pdf
- 7TH AACTA AWARDS PRESENTED BY FOXTEL All Winners – by Category
- YOUR NAME: Genki Kawamura, Katsuhiro Takei, KOUICHIROU ITOU, Yoshihiro Furusawa 45.45.17.170 (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I think Itou might have enough notability to have his own article; however, the article itself does not prove notability as it stands, so it requires way more work done before I think it should be considered being added to mainspace. There are two sentences here and one of them is about his criminal arrest, so it's just not ready. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- "I think Itou might have enough notability to have his own article" -Sarcataclysmal
- Case in point. Kouichirou Itou is obviously notable. To ignore this fact would be to abstain from the use of all reason; undermining wikipedia itself as a reputable source of "facts". An accusation, sans a conviction is not grounds for challenging this individual of (obvious) notability. His works are certainly non-trivial. They're not hard to find. 45.45.17.170 (talk) 01:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)