User talk:ItzSwirlz: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:53, 30 March 2024

Welcome

Hello, ItzSwirlz, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Recent Edit to Square-1

Hello there, I recently saw your edit to the Square-1 page, with the addition of the new record, while your contributions are greatly appreciated, please note that CubeComps, and similar live score taking websites are not recognized as reliable sources. In the future, please wait for the official results to be posted on the World Cube Association website before updating the pages. Thank you. AVeryBadTypist (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)AVeryBadTypist[reply]

Do not mark major edits as minor

Hi ItzSwirlz! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 15:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Team Zero Percent (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately I'm not sure this is independently notable. Ideally, if there were a Super Mario Maker series page, this would be a better fit there, but I'm mindful that does not exist which makes it a bit more complex. Admittedly, are four sources of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources: GamesRadar, Softonic, NintendoLife and NME, but they seem to canvas the same thing: there's a fan project to complete all uncompleted Mario Maker stages, and this project has until the closure of servers to do it. The remainder is largely from WP:PRIMARY, WP:USERG and WP:UNRELIABLE sources: the Reddit and Google Docs entries aren't a great sign. Given it's currently underway to a deadline, it might be WP:TOOSOON: more coverage later could provide better depth. Happy to chat on the talk page, and you're welcome to resubmit if you disagree.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Team Zero Percent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your quick review!

The thought of 0% not being notable enough yet was something the community was also worried about while I was writing the article. I think it is just WP:TOOSOON and once the last two levels (we made it to two!) are cleared we will get more coverage.

Hopefully, sources can refer to the spreadsheet/data or there will be a sort of 'press release' with all the information, like the milestone dates.

SMM1 and 2 having a 'SMM series' page would be a stub article. If a SMM3 is announced then it is worth noting - for now, could it be included on Super Mario Maker? ItzSwirlz (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ItzSwirlz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Team Zero Percent has been accepted

Team Zero Percent, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 19:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bowser Jr.

Well, I saw your draft and it looks like you want to build this up? Since I was the one who started to redirect it and I think I felt all the guilt to the editors who wants to restore it. Here are the sigcov possibly [1] [2] [3]. I feel like you can pull it up, but it all defends on how you write. There's bit more here [4] [5] [6] [7] and [8]. You need to build reception first. I really despise this article/character to help you. So goodluck, I guess. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 05:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I'm leaving it as a draft for now because people were complaining that the 0% article was more notable than Bowser Jr. Since I don't really have motivation or deep interest, I'm leaving the draft as is for now. ItzSwirlz (talk) 12:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Format

You might check with the chem community about their views on formatting equations. At least before you do too many. The chem operation within Wikipedia has been ongoing for many years, so it has some cultural traditions and advice. Just sayin' --Smokefoot (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll ask WikiProject Chemicals ItzSwirlz (talk) 18:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 146: / Line 146: @@
 ==Format==
 You might check with the chem community about their views on formatting equations.  At least before you do too many.  The chem operation within Wikipedia has been ongoing for many years, so it has some cultural traditions and advice. Just sayin'  --[[User:Smokefoot|Smokefoot]] ([[User talk:Smokefoot|talk]]) 18:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
+:Sure, I'll ask WikiProject Chemicals [[User:ItzSwirlz|ItzSwirlz]] ([[User talk:ItzSwirlz#top|talk]]) 18:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)