Jump to content

Talk:Monoecy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Plants}}, {{WikiProject Biology}}.
Hybrid system: new section
Line 3: Line 3:
{{WikiProject Biology|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biology|importance=Low}}
}}
}}

== Hybrid system ==

There are other systems without proper names, such as Black Mulberry and Papaya which has individuals predominately of either male and female flowers or only female flowers. Papaya might have male and hermaphroditic flowers.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356648232_Flower_structures_of_black_mulberry_Morus_nigra_trees
Perhaps this would be called semi-androdioecious, or solum-gynodioecious (only female split sex). I vote for the latter for whatever my opinion means. Mixed-dioecity would also be reasonable as a broader term. [[Special:Contributions/90.247.229.178|90.247.229.178]] ([[User talk:90.247.229.178|talk]]) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:35, 10 April 2024

Hybrid system

There are other systems without proper names, such as Black Mulberry and Papaya which has individuals predominately of either male and female flowers or only female flowers. Papaya might have male and hermaphroditic flowers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356648232_Flower_structures_of_black_mulberry_Morus_nigra_trees Perhaps this would be called semi-androdioecious, or solum-gynodioecious (only female split sex). I vote for the latter for whatever my opinion means. Mixed-dioecity would also be reasonable as a broader term. 90.247.229.178 (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]