Jump to content

Talk:2024 FIVB Women's Volleyball Nations League: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Results by round table.: reply to ILoveSport2006
Line 16: Line 16:
::I understand your point, however I disagree due to the facts I mentioned above and it shouldn't be deleted yet because there is no consensus yet on if it should stay or not. Right now, it is one opinion for and one opinion against. [[User:ILoveSport2006|ILoveSport2006]] ([[User talk:ILoveSport2006|talk]]) 21:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::I understand your point, however I disagree due to the facts I mentioned above and it shouldn't be deleted yet because there is no consensus yet on if it should stay or not. Right now, it is one opinion for and one opinion against. [[User:ILoveSport2006|ILoveSport2006]] ([[User talk:ILoveSport2006|talk]]) 21:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Other editor told you in Help desk about BRD: "{{tq|..not restoring the content in the reverted edit until a discussion is concluded or there is no response to the discussion for a while..}}" so why re-adding? If feels like the action you do is you don't want to understand what BRD and STATUSQUO is. '''<span style="background:#FFBE98;border:1px solid #FFF8E7;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:98Tigerius|<span style="color:#FFF8E7">98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂</span>]] • [[User talk:98Tigerius|<span style="color:#FFF8E7">[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]</span>]]</span>''' 22:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:::Other editor told you in Help desk about BRD: "{{tq|..not restoring the content in the reverted edit until a discussion is concluded or there is no response to the discussion for a while..}}" so why re-adding? If feels like the action you do is you don't want to understand what BRD and STATUSQUO is. '''<span style="background:#FFBE98;border:1px solid #FFF8E7;border-radius:18px;padding:4px">[[User:98Tigerius|<span style="color:#FFF8E7">98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂</span>]] • [[User talk:98Tigerius|<span style="color:#FFF8E7">[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]</span>]]</span>''' 22:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
*'''Admin note''' I've fully protected the article for three days in lieu of blocking both of you for persistent edit warring. Follow [[WP:DR]].-- [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">'''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 22:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:08, 22 May 2024

Results by round table.

A few days ago, I created a table showing when teams won/lost and their form during the tournament. I created it because I felt it would be useful and many other articles in other sports use a similar table due to its usefulness. Also, it will indicate who is in good form in each week, which I think could be an interesting piece of information to have without having to manually look yourself.

In the 2022 FIVB Volleyball Women's Nations League, I was supporting Thailand and I could've done with a results by round table because I would always have to look at each pool and learn myself about where they got their wins from since I became interested in the competition after week 1.

I always believe in the more info, the better, and I personally think that the table is useful and adds something to the article.

However, somebody keeps on deleting the table I put effort on and called it unnecessary and irrelevant. But, so far, I don't think there is a general consensus that the table is useless. So I would like to ask people what there opinion is on the table and if it should be included or not because to me, this table is really useful in my opinion. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While it's a deletion-discussion argument, the logic of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS applies here. I know you put it in 2024 Men's European Volleyball League and 2024 Women's European Volleyball League doesn't mean it needs to be done everywhere. Also other user already told you that round by round tables are already deprecated. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your point, however I disagree due to the facts I mentioned above and it shouldn't be deleted yet because there is no consensus yet on if it should stay or not. Right now, it is one opinion for and one opinion against. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Other editor told you in Help desk about BRD: "..not restoring the content in the reverted edit until a discussion is concluded or there is no response to the discussion for a while.." so why re-adding? If feels like the action you do is you don't want to understand what BRD and STATUSQUO is. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Admin note I've fully protected the article for three days in lieu of blocking both of you for persistent edit warring. Follow WP:DR.-- Ponyobons mots 22:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]