Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
→‎Nigger (dog): Not unprotected (using responseHelper)
Line 4: Line 4:
* {{pagelinks|Nigger (dog)}}
* {{pagelinks|Nigger (dog)}}
'''Reason:''' The protection is no longer necessary because any vandalism has likely died down. The article needs a bit of clean up in regards to paragraphs placement and sources needed.[[Special:Contributions/2.100.74.138|2.100.74.138]] ([[User talk:2.100.74.138|talk]]) 16:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
'''Reason:''' The protection is no longer necessary because any vandalism has likely died down. The article needs a bit of clean up in regards to paragraphs placement and sources needed.[[Special:Contributions/2.100.74.138|2.100.74.138]] ([[User talk:2.100.74.138|talk]]) 16:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not unprotected'''<!-- Template:RFPP#noun --> – Erh, no, that's not gonna work, but I have added {{tl|Edit semi-protected}} to your existing talk page request in order to attract some attention. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 17:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


=== ''[[1917 (2019 film)|1917]]'' (2019) ===
=== ''[[1917 (2019 film)|1917]]'' (2019) ===

Revision as of 17:02, 23 May 2024

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

Click here to return to Requests for page protection.

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Nigger (dog)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because any vandalism has likely died down. The article needs a bit of clean up in regards to paragraphs placement and sources needed.2.100.74.138 (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Erh, no, that's not gonna work, but I have added {{Edit semi-protected}} to your existing talk page request in order to attract some attention. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1917 (2019)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the film’s notablitly has been quieted down. The plot currently reads "(Schofield) awakens at night and makes his way through the flare-lit ruins of the town. After evading a German soldier, he discovers a French woman hiding with a presumably orphaned infant." When he is making his way, he is fired upon by several unseen Germans, before he encounters and is chased by the one that charges him, the French woman says she doesn't know who the baby's mother is, so "presumably" could be irrelevant to use. so it could be rephrased to "He is fired upon by Germans and after invading one, find a French woman hiding with an orphan child". In addition, it could be added for this section, in which Cumberbatch's character says that Schofield's efforts might have been in vain in the end: "He forces his way in to meet Mackenzie, who reads the message and reluctantly calls off the attack, though Mackenzie also says that, while the cancellation offers a temporary reprieve, command will likely change its orders in a week. 2.100.74.138 (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]