Talk:Incheon Airport Maglev: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Korea}}, {{WikiProject Trains}}. Tag: |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Korea |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Korea |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Trains |importance=low |
{{WikiProject Trains |importance=low|passenger=yes |monorail=yes}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 15:39, 29 May 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cdpak567.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Not the second
[edit]Korea is definitely NOT the second country to introduce its own self-developed maglev system. The UK was first, with a Maglev which started carrying passengers in 1984. Germany was second, with the Berlin M-Bahn which started carrying passengers in regular service in 1991, although trail services began in 1989. Then Japan and Korea. The British Maglev used 'cabin' sized vehicles. But that was sufficient to start with.
Information source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maglev Spsmiler (talk) 11:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Vague
[edit]There is a tag at the top of this page saying the page might be unclear. I am not sure what section(s) might be thought of as unclear. Any suggestions would be appreciated. ₪RicknAsia₪ 02:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
my opinion is that it begins clearly and well written. however, beginning with the History and Past Research sections, it is less so. there are 6 paragraphs in those 2 sections, and after the 1st paragraph, i deem most poorly written, as if from a poor translation, and each subsequent paragraph is increasingly less relevant to this specific train. I'd eliminate paragraphs 2 through 6 and maybe rewrite them and move to another article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.207.144.50 (talk) 22:30, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
It's very unclear whether "History and Past Research" is even referring to this particular maglev at all, it explicitly states the IAM as an example of not what it's talking about? 73.209.95.97 (talk) 01:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)