Jump to content

Malay Agenda: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Grammar, altered link, removed un encyclopedic text, etc
 
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date = February 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date = February 2019}}


In [[Malaysian politics]], the '''Malay Agenda''' is a concept related to the ideal of ''[[ketuanan Melayu]]'' (Malay supremacy or dominance). Although it did not feature in public discussion for much of the 20th century, in the early 2000s, it came to prominence due to its usage in the discourse of several politicians from the [[United Malays National Organisation]] (UMNO), the leading [[political party]] in Malaysia. The Malay Agenda is closely related to UMNO, which sees itself as the guardian of the Malay majority ethnic group in Malaysia.
In [[Malaysian politics]], the '''Malay Agenda''' is a concept related to the ideal of ''[[ketuanan Melayu]]'' (Malay supremacy or dominance). Although it did not feature in public discussion for much of the 20th century, in the early 2000s, it came to prominence due to its usage in the discourse of several politicians from the [[United Malays National Organisation]] (UMNO), the leading [[political party]] in Malaysia. The Malay Agenda is closely related to the UMNO, which sees itself as the guardian of the [[Malays (ethnic group)|Malay]] ethnic group in Malaysia.


==Definition==
==Definition==
According to one local academic, the Malay Agenda constitutes the special privileges granted to the Malays and other indigenous peoples (collectively referred to as [[Bumiputra]]s) in the [[Constitution of Malaysia]]. This would include the articles relating to the Malay monarchs and the Malaysian head of state, the [[Yang di-Pertuan Agong]], the portions of the Constitution pertaining to Malay-associated national symbols such as the position of [[Islam]] as the state religion, Malay land reservations, and the status of the [[Malay language]] as the national language. The controversial [[Article 153]], which grants Malays several preferences and [[Quota Share|quota]]s in the sphere of education, employment and the civil service, would also fall under the Malay Agenda. It is held that non-Malay Malaysians were granted Malaysian citizenship in return for their acceptance of the Malay Agenda &mdash; in another sense, the Malay Agenda represents half of the [[Malaysian social contract]], with the other half being the granting of citizenship to the non-Malays.<ref>[http://malaysia-today.net/blog2006/newsncom.php?itemid=701 M'sia's continued survival hinges on Malay Agenda, says don] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927004300/http://malaysia-today.net/blog2006/newsncom.php?itemid=701 |date=2007-09-27 }}. (Nov. 14, 2006). ''Malaysia Today''.</ref>
According to one local academic, the Malay Agenda constitutes the special privileges granted to the Malays and other indigenous peoples (collectively referred to as [[Bumiputra]]s) in the [[Constitution of Malaysia]]. This would include the articles relating to the Malay monarchs and the Malaysian head of state, the [[Yang di-Pertuan Agong]], the portions of the Constitution pertaining to Malay-associated national symbols such as the position of [[Islam]] as the state religion, Malay land reservations, and the status of the [[Malay language]] as the national language. The controversial [[Article 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia|Article 153]], which grants Malays several preferences and [[Quota Share|quota]]s in the sphere of education, employment and the civil service, would also fall under the Malay Agenda. It is held that non-Malay Malaysians were granted Malaysian citizenship in return for their acceptance of the Malay Agenda &mdash; in another sense, the Malay Agenda represents half of the [[Malaysian social contract]], with the other half being the granting of citizenship to the non-Malays.<ref>[http://malaysia-today.net/blog2006/newsncom.php?itemid=701 M'sia's continued survival hinges on Malay Agenda, says don] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927004300/http://malaysia-today.net/blog2006/newsncom.php?itemid=701 |date=2007-09-27 }}. (Nov. 14, 2006). ''Malaysia Today''.</ref>


The Malay Agenda assumes a local tinge at the state level; different states emphasises different aspects of the Agenda. In the [[Federal Territories (Malaysia)|Federal Territory]] of [[Kuala Lumpur]], [[urban poverty]] and [[slum]]s are the main thrust of the UMNO delegation. In a rural state like [[Terengganu]], poverty eradication and religion are underscored.<ref>Tan, Joceline (Nov. 12, 2006). [http://thestar.com.my/columnists/story.asp?file=/columnists/2006/11/12/joceline/15980834&sec=Joceline Malay Agenda on the agenda]. ''The Star''.</ref>
Different states emphasises different aspects of the Malay Agenda. In the [[Federal Territories (Malaysia)|Federal Territory]] of [[Kuala Lumpur]], [[urban poverty]] and [[slum]]s are the main target of the UMNO delegation. In rural states like [[Terengganu]], poverty eradication and religion are underscored.<ref>Tan, Joceline (Nov. 12, 2006). [http://thestar.com.my/columnists/story.asp?file=/columnists/2006/11/12/joceline/15980834&sec=Joceline Malay Agenda on the agenda]. ''The Star''.</ref>


==Modern usage==
==Modern usage==
The Malay Agenda has been particularly prominent in UMNO General Assemblies. It is often associated by politicians with Malay political primacy, as embodied by ''[[ketuanan Melayu]]'', and the [[Malaysian New Economic Policy]] (NEP), which grants Malays substantial preferences and quotas in the private sector.
The Malay Agenda has been particularly prominent in UMNO General Assemblies. It is often associated by politicians with Malay political primacy, as an embodied by ''[[ketuanan Melayu]]'', and the [[Malaysian New Economic Policy]] (NEP), which grants Malays substantial preferences and quotas in the private sector.


In the 2006 UMNO General Assembly, several politicians brought up the issue of leaders from other members of the governing coalition, the [[Barisan Nasional]], who criticised or questioned the government's ethnic policies. One analyst said: "This AGM is quite interesting in other ways, apart from the feuding that does exist, which seems to purport that there are different groups in opposition to each other within the ruling party; it's clearly a question of what we might call simply as a Malay agenda, and the Malay agenda is the primacy of Malays in politics in this country."<ref>Goh, Melissa (Nov. 14, 2006). [http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/southeastasia/view/241117/1/.html 'Malay agenda' expected to dominate UMNO General Assembly]. ''Channelnewsasia.com''.</ref>
In the 2006 UMNO General Assembly, several politicians brought up the issue of leaders from other members of the governing coalition, the [[Barisan Nasional]], who criticised or questioned the government's ethnic policies. One analyst said: "This AGM is quite interesting in other ways, apart from the feuding that does exist, which seems to purport that there are different groups in opposition to each other within the ruling party; it's clearly a question of what we might call simply as a Malay agenda, and the Malay agenda is the primacy of Malays in politics in this country."<ref>Goh, Melissa (Nov. 14, 2006). [http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/southeastasia/view/241117/1/.html 'Malay agenda' expected to dominate UMNO General Assembly]. ''Channelnewsasia.com''.</ref>


At the Assembly, Education Minister and UMNO Youth Chief [[Hishamuddin Hussein]], who had made headlines when he brandished the Malay dagger (''[[kris]]'') at the previous year's Assembly, stated that "The Malay Agenda in the National Mission should not be regarded as a zero-sum game, by saying only the Malays are benefiting and that the non-Malays are losing out. The non-[[bumiputera (Malaysia)|bumiputera]]s should be brave enough to admit that during the implementation of the New Economic Policy, they also derived benefits, either directly or indirectly, through projects in the various sectors." Other delegates spoke out against the perceived economic inequities, citing the Malays' official share of equity that stood at 18%, although Malays comprised almost half the Malaysian population.<ref>Ahmad, Zainon (Nov. 14, 2006). [http://sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=16106 Umno delegates stick to the script] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070125235113/http://www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=16106 |date=2007-01-25 }}. ''The Sun''.</ref>
At the Assembly, Education Minister and [[UMNO Youth]] Chief [[Hishamuddin Hussein]], who had made headlines when he brandished a [[Kris|''kris'']] (a Malay dagger) at the previous year's Assembly, stated that "The Malay Agenda in the National Mission should not be regarded as a zero-sum game, by saying only the Malays are benefiting and that the non-Malays are losing out. The non-[[bumiputera (Malaysia)|bumiputera]]s should be brave enough to admit that during the implementation of the New Economic Policy, they also derived benefits, either directly or indirectly, through projects in the various sectors." Other delegates spoke out against the perceived economic inequities, citing the Malays' official share of equity that stood at 18%, although Malays comprised almost half the Malaysian population.<ref>Ahmad, Zainon (Nov. 14, 2006). [http://sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=16106 Umno delegates stick to the script] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070125235113/http://www.sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=16106 |date=2007-01-25 }}. ''The Sun''.</ref>


The share of equity itself had been heatedly disputed not long before when a local [[think tank]] calculated the Malay share of equity to stand at 45% in 2006, based on the 1,000 publicly listed companies. This significantly exceeded the government target of 30%, which had been set by the NEP. However, the figures were disputed by the government, which used [[par value]] instead of [[market value]] to calculate equity, did not consider any portion of government-linked companies to be Malay-owned, and looked at all 600,000 registered companies instead of just the publicly listed ones.<ref>Ahmad, Abdul Razak & Chow, Kum Hor (Oct. 22, 2006). "The nation's economic pie in perspective", pp. 20&ndash;21. ''New Sunday Times''.</ref> Critics argued, however, that the usage of par value was antiquated and did not reflect the true value of the equity owned.<ref>Backman, Michael (Nov. 15, 2006). [http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/while-malaysia-fiddles-its-opportunities-are-running-dry/2006/11/14/1163266550487.html?page=fullpage While Malaysia fiddles, its opportunities are running dry]. ''The Age''.</ref>
The share of equity itself had been disputed not long before when a local [[think tank]] calculated the Malay share of equity to stand at 45% in 2006, based on the 1,000 publicly listed companies. This significantly exceeded the government target of 30%, which had been set by the NEP. However, the figures were disputed by the government, which used [[par value]] instead of [[market value]] to calculate equity, did not consider any portion of government-linked companies to be Malay-owned, and looked at all 600,000 registered companies instead of just the publicly listed ones.<ref>Ahmad, Abdul Razak & Chow, Kum Hor (Oct. 22, 2006). "The nation's economic pie in perspective", pp. 20&ndash;21. ''New Sunday Times''.</ref> Critics argued, however, that the usage of par value was antiquated and did not reflect the true value of the equity owned.<ref>Backman, Michael (Nov. 15, 2006). [http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/while-malaysia-fiddles-its-opportunities-are-running-dry/2006/11/14/1163266550487.html?page=fullpage While Malaysia fiddles, its opportunities are running dry]. ''The Age''.</ref>


[[Image:Najib crop.jpg|thumb|150px|Deputy Prime Minister [[Najib Tun Razak]] said there would be no time limit for the expiration of the Malay Agenda.]]
[[Image:Najib crop.jpg|thumb|150px|Deputy Prime Minister [[Najib Tun Razak]] said there would be no time limit for the expiration of the Malay Agenda.]]

Latest revision as of 08:45, 18 June 2024

In Malaysian politics, the Malay Agenda is a concept related to the ideal of ketuanan Melayu (Malay supremacy or dominance). Although it did not feature in public discussion for much of the 20th century, in the early 2000s, it came to prominence due to its usage in the discourse of several politicians from the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), the leading political party in Malaysia. The Malay Agenda is closely related to the UMNO, which sees itself as the guardian of the Malay ethnic group in Malaysia.

Definition[edit]

According to one local academic, the Malay Agenda constitutes the special privileges granted to the Malays and other indigenous peoples (collectively referred to as Bumiputras) in the Constitution of Malaysia. This would include the articles relating to the Malay monarchs and the Malaysian head of state, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the portions of the Constitution pertaining to Malay-associated national symbols such as the position of Islam as the state religion, Malay land reservations, and the status of the Malay language as the national language. The controversial Article 153, which grants Malays several preferences and quotas in the sphere of education, employment and the civil service, would also fall under the Malay Agenda. It is held that non-Malay Malaysians were granted Malaysian citizenship in return for their acceptance of the Malay Agenda — in another sense, the Malay Agenda represents half of the Malaysian social contract, with the other half being the granting of citizenship to the non-Malays.[1]

Different states emphasises different aspects of the Malay Agenda. In the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, urban poverty and slums are the main target of the UMNO delegation. In rural states like Terengganu, poverty eradication and religion are underscored.[2]

Modern usage[edit]

The Malay Agenda has been particularly prominent in UMNO General Assemblies. It is often associated by politicians with Malay political primacy, as an embodied by ketuanan Melayu, and the Malaysian New Economic Policy (NEP), which grants Malays substantial preferences and quotas in the private sector.

In the 2006 UMNO General Assembly, several politicians brought up the issue of leaders from other members of the governing coalition, the Barisan Nasional, who criticised or questioned the government's ethnic policies. One analyst said: "This AGM is quite interesting in other ways, apart from the feuding that does exist, which seems to purport that there are different groups in opposition to each other within the ruling party; it's clearly a question of what we might call simply as a Malay agenda, and the Malay agenda is the primacy of Malays in politics in this country."[3]

At the Assembly, Education Minister and UMNO Youth Chief Hishamuddin Hussein, who had made headlines when he brandished a kris (a Malay dagger) at the previous year's Assembly, stated that "The Malay Agenda in the National Mission should not be regarded as a zero-sum game, by saying only the Malays are benefiting and that the non-Malays are losing out. The non-bumiputeras should be brave enough to admit that during the implementation of the New Economic Policy, they also derived benefits, either directly or indirectly, through projects in the various sectors." Other delegates spoke out against the perceived economic inequities, citing the Malays' official share of equity that stood at 18%, although Malays comprised almost half the Malaysian population.[4]

The share of equity itself had been disputed not long before when a local think tank calculated the Malay share of equity to stand at 45% in 2006, based on the 1,000 publicly listed companies. This significantly exceeded the government target of 30%, which had been set by the NEP. However, the figures were disputed by the government, which used par value instead of market value to calculate equity, did not consider any portion of government-linked companies to be Malay-owned, and looked at all 600,000 registered companies instead of just the publicly listed ones.[5] Critics argued, however, that the usage of par value was antiquated and did not reflect the true value of the equity owned.[6]

Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak said there would be no time limit for the expiration of the Malay Agenda.

At the Assembly, some responded by calling for the Malay equity target to be increased to 70%, in line with the Malay Agenda.[7] At the same time, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak said that there would be no time limit set for the achievement of the Malay Agenda, arguing that four centuries of colonialist oppression of the Malays could not be undone in a few decades.[8]

See also[edit]

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ M'sia's continued survival hinges on Malay Agenda, says don Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine. (Nov. 14, 2006). Malaysia Today.
  2. ^ Tan, Joceline (Nov. 12, 2006). Malay Agenda on the agenda. The Star.
  3. ^ Goh, Melissa (Nov. 14, 2006). 'Malay agenda' expected to dominate UMNO General Assembly. Channelnewsasia.com.
  4. ^ Ahmad, Zainon (Nov. 14, 2006). Umno delegates stick to the script Archived 2007-01-25 at the Wayback Machine. The Sun.
  5. ^ Ahmad, Abdul Razak & Chow, Kum Hor (Oct. 22, 2006). "The nation's economic pie in perspective", pp. 20–21. New Sunday Times.
  6. ^ Backman, Michael (Nov. 15, 2006). While Malaysia fiddles, its opportunities are running dry. The Age.
  7. ^ Hamid, Wan Hamidi (Nov. 15, 2006). Brickbats for BN partners Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine. New Straits Times.
  8. ^ No time limit to achieve Malay Agenda, says Najib Archived 2007-07-10 at the Wayback Machine. (Nov. 14, 2006). The Star.