Andreas text-type: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Codex Reuchlinianus, Ap 17,8.jpg|thumb|Codex Reuchlinianus/Minuscule 2814]] |
[[File:Codex Reuchlinianus, Ap 17,8.jpg|thumb|Codex Reuchlinianus/Minuscule 2814 follows the Andreas text]] |
||
The '''Andreas text-type''' is a form of the text of the [[Book of Revelation]] found in some manuscripts of Revelation, it is named after [[Andreas of Caesarea]], (563–614) whose manuscript followed this text-type.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Caesarea.) |first=Andrew (Archbishop of |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/Commentary_on_the_Apocalypse/AmMEhsEYHUsC?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+revelation&pg=PA41&printsec=frontcover |title=Commentary on the Apocalypse |date=2011-12-12 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-0123-8 |
The '''Andreas text-type''' is a form of the text of the [[Book of Revelation]] found in some manuscripts of Revelation, it is named after [[Andreas of Caesarea]], (563–614) whose manuscript followed this text-type.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Caesarea.) |first=Andrew (Archbishop of |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/Commentary_on_the_Apocalypse/AmMEhsEYHUsC?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+revelation&pg=PA41&printsec=frontcover |title=Commentary on the Apocalypse |date=2011-12-12 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-0123-8 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
Manuscripts belonging to the Andreas text-type are primarily found in manuscript of Andreas' commentary although there exists Andreas manuscripts which do not contain the commentary.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Elliott |first=James Keith |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/New_Testament_Textual_Criticism_The_Appl/hOF5DwAAQBAJ?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Byzantine+text&pg=PA149&printsec=frontcover |title=New Testament Textual Criticism:The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles: Essays on Manuscripts and Textual Variation |date=2010-12-17 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-19436-6 |language=en}}</ref> The Andreas text is related to the [[Byzantine text-type]], but differs from it in some places.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Aland |first=Kurt |url=https://archive.org/details/textnewtestament00kurt |title=The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism |last2=Aland |first2=Barbara |publisher=[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company]] |others=Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.) |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-8028-4098-1 |location=Grand Rapids |page=[https://archive.org/details/textnewtestament00kurt/page/n162 140] |doi= |id= |url-access=limited |authorlink=Kurt Aland |authorlink2=Barbara Aland}}</ref> |
Manuscripts belonging to the Andreas text-type are primarily found in manuscript of Andreas' commentary although there exists Andreas manuscripts which do not contain the commentary.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Elliott |first=James Keith |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/New_Testament_Textual_Criticism_The_Appl/hOF5DwAAQBAJ?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Byzantine+text&pg=PA149&printsec=frontcover |title=New Testament Textual Criticism:The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles: Essays on Manuscripts and Textual Variation |date=2010-12-17 |publisher=BRILL |isbn=978-90-04-19436-6 |language=en}}</ref> The Andreas text is related to the [[Byzantine text-type]], but differs from it in some places.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Aland |first=Kurt |url=https://archive.org/details/textnewtestament00kurt |title=The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism |last2=Aland |first2=Barbara |publisher=[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company]] |others=Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.) |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-8028-4098-1 |location=Grand Rapids |page=[https://archive.org/details/textnewtestament00kurt/page/n162 140] |doi= |id= |url-access=limited |authorlink=Kurt Aland |authorlink2=Barbara Aland}}</ref> |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
It has been argued that the 4th century corrector of the [[Codex Sinaiticus]] followed the Andreas text-type.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Constantinou |first=Eugenia Scarvelis |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/Guiding_to_a_Blessed_End/mM7aUdl9WB4C?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Sinaiaticus&pg=PA290&printsec=frontcover |title=Guiding to a Blessed End: Andrew of Caesarea and His Apocalypse Commentary in the Ancient Church |date=2013-02-18 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-2114-4 |language=en}}</ref> |
It has been argued that the 4th century corrector of the [[Codex Sinaiticus]] followed the Andreas text-type.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Constantinou |first=Eugenia Scarvelis |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/Guiding_to_a_Blessed_End/mM7aUdl9WB4C?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Sinaiaticus&pg=PA290&printsec=frontcover |title=Guiding to a Blessed End: Andrew of Caesarea and His Apocalypse Commentary in the Ancient Church |date=2013-02-18 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-2114-4 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
Schmid numbered around 83 witnesses to the text, these include unicials such as 25, 88, 205, 209 and 632. <ref name=":0" /> There are additionally multiple Georgian, Armenian and Slavonic copies of the commentary of Andreas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Caesarea.) |first=Andrew (Archbishop of |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/Commentary_on_the_Apocalypse/AmMEhsEYHUsC?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Sinaiaticus&pg=PA41&printsec=frontcover |title=Commentary on the Apocalypse |date=2011-12-12 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-0123-8 |language=en}}</ref> |
Schmid numbered around 83 witnesses to the text, these include unicials such as 25, 88, 205, 209 and 632. <ref name=":0" /> There are additionally multiple Georgian, Armenian and Slavonic copies of the commentary of Andreas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Caesarea.) |first=Andrew (Archbishop of |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/Commentary_on_the_Apocalypse/AmMEhsEYHUsC?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Sinaiaticus&pg=PA41&printsec=frontcover |title=Commentary on the Apocalypse |date=2011-12-12 |publisher=CUA Press |isbn=978-0-8132-0123-8 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
The Andreas text was used by [[Erasmus]] in his creation of the [[Textus Receptus]] due to the usage of [[Minuscule 2814]] and thus the text of Revelation in most Reformation-era translations follows the Andreas text-type.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Waltz |first=Robert B. |url=https://www.google.fi/books/edition/The_Encyclopedia_of_New_Testament_Textua/pefhAAAAQBAJ?hl=eo&gbpv=1&dq=andreas+text+type+Textus+Receptus&pg=PA438&printsec=frontcover |title=The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism |publisher=Robert B. Waltz |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
Revision as of 11:12, 8 July 2024
The Andreas text-type is a form of the text of the Book of Revelation found in some manuscripts of Revelation, it is named after Andreas of Caesarea, (563–614) whose manuscript followed this text-type.[1]
Manuscripts belonging to the Andreas text-type are primarily found in manuscript of Andreas' commentary although there exists Andreas manuscripts which do not contain the commentary.[2] The Andreas text is related to the Byzantine text-type, but differs from it in some places.[3]
Andreas manuscripts form one third of all Greek manuscripts of Revelation.[4]
Andreas of Caearea
Andreas' is among the oldest Greek commentaries on Revelation.[5] Most subsequent Eastern Christian commentators of the Book of Revelation have drawn heavily upon Andrew and his commentary,[6] which was preserved in about 100 Greek manuscripts,[7] and was also translated into Armenian, Georgian, and Slavonic.[8] His commentary was so influential that it preserved the specific Andreas text type of Revelation.[7]
Witnesses
It has been argued that the 4th century corrector of the Codex Sinaiticus followed the Andreas text-type.[9]
Schmid numbered around 83 witnesses to the text, these include unicials such as 25, 88, 205, 209 and 632. [2] There are additionally multiple Georgian, Armenian and Slavonic copies of the commentary of Andreas.[10]
The Andreas text was used by Erasmus in his creation of the Textus Receptus due to the usage of Minuscule 2814 and thus the text of Revelation in most Reformation-era translations follows the Andreas text-type.[11]
References
- ^ Caesarea.), Andrew (Archbishop of (2011-12-12). Commentary on the Apocalypse. CUA Press. ISBN 978-0-8132-0123-8.
- ^ a b Elliott, James Keith (2010-12-17). New Testament Textual Criticism:The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles: Essays on Manuscripts and Textual Variation. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-19436-6.
- ^ Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 140. ISBN 978-0-8028-4098-1.
- ^ Meeting, Society of Biblical Literature (2009). Exegesis and Hermeneutics in the Churches of the East: Select Papers from the SBL Meeting in San Diego, 2007. Peter Lang. ISBN 978-1-4331-0495-4.
- ^ Constantinou 2011, p. 7.
- ^ Constantinou 2011, p. 3.
- ^ a b Constantinou 2011, p. 41.
- ^ Baldwin, Barry (1991). "Andrew, archbishop of Caesarea". In Kazhdan, Alexander P. (ed.). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford University Press. p. 92. ISBN 0-19-504652-8.
- ^ Constantinou, Eugenia Scarvelis (2013-02-18). Guiding to a Blessed End: Andrew of Caesarea and His Apocalypse Commentary in the Ancient Church. CUA Press. ISBN 978-0-8132-2114-4.
- ^ Caesarea.), Andrew (Archbishop of (2011-12-12). Commentary on the Apocalypse. CUA Press. ISBN 978-0-8132-0123-8.
- ^ Waltz, Robert B. The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism. Robert B. Waltz.