Wikipedia:Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Restored revision 1237403632 by Jimmy the badger (talk): Rv defamatory content |
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Feel free to try your editing skills below * |
* Feel free to try your editing skills below * |
||
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■--> |
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■--> |
||
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan. I felt that it was an unnecessary loss of civilian life... We had them beaten. |
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point u of view, in the defeat of Japan. I felt that it was an unnecessary loss of civilian life... We had them beaten. |
||
• Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz |
• Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz |
||
Revision as of 16:57, 29 July 2024
 | Welcome to this sandbox page, a space to experiment with editing.
You can either edit the source code ("Edit source" tab above) or use VisualEditor ("Edit" tab above). Click the "Publish changes" button when finished. You can click "Show preview" to see a preview of your edits, or "Show changes" to see what you have changed. Anyone can edit this page and it is automatically cleared regularly (anything you write will not remain indefinitely). Click here to reset the sandbox. You can access your personal sandbox by clicking here, or using the "Sandbox" link in the top right.Creating an account gives you access to a personal sandbox, among other benefits. Do NOT, under any circumstances, place promotional, copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandbox pages. Doing so WILL get you blocked from editing. For more info about sandboxes, see Wikipedia:About the sandbox and Help:My sandbox. New to Wikipedia? See the contributing to Wikipedia page or our tutorial. Questions? Try the Teahouse! |
.png){kind=link}
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point u of view, in the defeat of Japan. I felt that it was an unnecessary loss of civilian life... We had them beaten.
• Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz
"It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nakasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons. It was my reaction that the scientists and others wanted to make this test because of the vast sums that had been spent on the project. Truman knew that, and so did the other people involved."
• Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy
The consensus, as I understand it, was that the bombs were vital.
Wrong.
The official conclusion of the US military is:
Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.
Source: United States Strategic Bombing Survey (Pacific War)
The bombs played no part in Japans surrender, they were going to surrender anyways, and this was known at the time.
https://www.reddit.com /r/Presidents/s/dSG7DaoRKF Jimmy the badgaaaaaaaaar