User talk:Grace Note: Difference between revisions
Grace Note (talk | contribs) Remove threat from angry child |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:I think it's an internal thing. I wouldn't get involved if I were you. Why not log in, BTW, and become a regular editor? It can be very enjoyable! [[User:Grace Note|Grace Note]] 07:07, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
:I think it's an internal thing. I wouldn't get involved if I were you. Why not log in, BTW, and become a regular editor? It can be very enjoyable! [[User:Grace Note|Grace Note]] 07:07, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
=="You know, it's none of my business..."== |
|||
And you should have stopped right there, especially since you misunderstand and mischaracterize what's happening, and toss in some passive-aggressive insults to boot. Is "integrity" such a difficult concept for you? |
|||
Read your own words, absorb their meaning, and save your scolding for someone who invited it. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 12:43, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:43, 16 April 2005
Spelling
Thanks for correcting 'practise' in my spelling guide. I've just completed the first version: User:SpNeo/Spelling Guide SpNeo 16:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Chills
I'm impressed! I go back to copyedit what I've done, only to discover you've beaten me to the punch! Quick work! (BTW I love the Chills too, and my former band had the honour of being their support act a couple of times!) Grutness|hello? 
02:15, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your clear, level-headed discussion about the pope infobox. As I posted on the talk page, your reasoning all makes sense now. Thanks. Bratschetalk random 03:02, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Aaa! You had to beat me to it. I had just pushed the preview button when the new message banner came up. In truth, it was really no big deal. I, too, wanted to make the right decision. Thanks for the thanks. Cheers, Bratschetalk random 03:05, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
Adminship
Hi Grace, I'm sorry for taking so long to get back to you. Regarding Peter, if there had been just a bit more evidence of interaction with others, I'd have voted for him, and I will vote for him next time if he's made an effort to talk to people a bit more (which I can see he's doing already). Admins need to be able to interact with others: in particular, they need to know the community and understand the dynamics of article talk pages. It's clear that Peter's an excellent editor and I will enthusiastically support him next time round. Best, SlimVirgin (talk) 08:32, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
You just reverted this page back to the "correct" version. But...it was already at the correct version. Lib Dem is a UK political party, so the name of the template proves it was at its correct version, and if you look at the very first version of the page, that is also so. I will revert it back. Reply here,--212.100.250.226 06:36, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I think it's an internal thing. I wouldn't get involved if I were you. Why not log in, BTW, and become a regular editor? It can be very enjoyable! Grace Note 07:07, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
"You know, it's none of my business..."
And you should have stopped right there, especially since you misunderstand and mischaracterize what's happening, and toss in some passive-aggressive insults to boot. Is "integrity" such a difficult concept for you?
Read your own words, absorb their meaning, and save your scolding for someone who invited it. --Calton | Talk 12:43, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)