User talk:OscarTheCat3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:40, 7 May 2007

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:OscarTheCat3.

Please leave a new message.

Block question

Hello Oscar. An abuse report has been filed regarding the Loudoun County Department of Information Tech blocks. Please feel free to contact me via email (my address is posted on my user page) regarding this action. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swinging

You wrote: "I think the link you removed ( A Sociological Perspective on the Lifestyle ) is actually one of the good ones. I didn't revert, since it seems like you were editing in good faith, but you might want to put that one back in. Maybe. OscarTheCat 00:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

I dunno-- seems weak to me. I tend to lean on WP:EL's "Sites with meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article". It's not clear to me that this site fits that criterion. If you want to put it back, though, I won't revert. Cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 01:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR and vandalism on Furcadia

Don't worry, the three-revert rule doesn't apply if you're reverting vandalism. :) --Ixfd64 04:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that! OscarTheCat3 20:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Charlie

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swinging article external links - your changes

That's better, actually - having them as references makes a clearer distinction between them and the spammy external links. Thanks!Inkwell 14:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in warning

Thanks for fixing my typo in a warning message --ArmadilloFromHell 06:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!! OscarTheCat3 06:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFD proposed without discussion?

I just started working on Lasagna battery article, added as part of an explanation in Reference Desk: Science, and returned to find your RFD proposal. But very oddly, I find no comments on the article talk page. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't such behavior akin to vandalism?

Please explain your intent. It would help if I knew if you have experience in physics education, and have strong feelings about deleting the article. If you honestly believe that this topic isn't good as a stand-alone article, perhaps it needs to be merged with other similar articles? Or are you just accusing me of Original Research? Are you aware that I just started the article a couple days ago, and haven't fleshed it out yet, nor added references? (You see, it would really help if you'd use the talk page instead of slapping on a template.)--Wjbeaty 21:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies for not employing the talk page. That may have been around the time my wife was, um, strongly suggesting that I put away the laptop for a bit.

To be clear, however, I did not AFD the article, I prod'd it. As stated in the prod template, at the time I read the article it sounded a bit to me like something someone made up in school one day. Since it is a prod, and not an AFD, you (or anyone) is free to remove the template, which I see that you did.

Obviously, vandalizing the article was not my intent, nor would it ever be. Likewise, no offense to you personally was ever intended. Hope this helps. OscarTheCat3 21:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I was reading more into your actions than what was there. So, where is the article? It's gone, as is the redirect. --Wjbeaty 19:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the deletion log, Tizio deleted the article. I'm not an admin, so I don't know much more than that. Might want to contact Tizio and ask him/her. OscarTheCat3 22:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Bar

How do I get rid of this damn yellow bar? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.126.143.59 (talk • contribs).

Um, I'm not sure which "yellow bar" you speak of. I don't see any yellow bars on my user talk page, nor on yours. Where is it exactly? Oh, by the way, please sign your posts by typing four ~s in a row. OscarTheCat3 00:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the yellow thing which says I have new messages. It won't go away. ~s~s~s~s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.143.59 (talk • contribs)

It goes away after you actually read the new messages on your talk page. Um, when I said four ~s I meant ~ ~ ~ ~ but without the spaces in between. OscarTheCat3 22:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It won't go away even when I read messages 130.126.143.59 23:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, stumped me then. Try asking at the Help Desk. Or try creating your own account. Good luck! OscarTheCat3 23:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do I have warnings on my home page?

Revision as of 23:56, 15 February 2007 edit OscarTheCat3 (talk \| contribs) 653 edits →‎Yellow Bar: uh, dunno then ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:40, 7 May 2007 edit undo 130.126.143.59 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 52:		Line 52:

	* Hmm, stumped me then. Try asking at the [[WP:HD\|Help Desk]]. Or try [[WP:WHY\|creating your own account]]. Good luck! [[User:OscarTheCat3\|OscarTheCat3]] 23:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)		* Hmm, stumped me then. Try asking at the [[WP:HD\|Help Desk]]. Or try [[WP:WHY\|creating your own account]]. Good luck! [[User:OscarTheCat3\|OscarTheCat3]] 23:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

			Why do I have warnings on my home page?