User talk:Wikimindless: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:28, 4 August 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Wikimindless, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Primogen 05:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight Zone user box

It's not my user box -- I borrowed it from someone else. I'm sure it's okay to use it. Primogen 18:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Olliver.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Olliver.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Runningheadless.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Runningheadless.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Running Headless

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Running Headless, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tomasz. 21:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Avatar-reeses2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Avatar-reeses2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olliver Kirby

Oh, sorry. I just saw your note on my talk page. I would have taken down the speedy-del if I had seen it. Sethwoodworth 04:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anetode

That guy is deleting all your sites, you should totally fuck him up. He also is taking shit about youAwsometrex 04:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Klass

A friendly warning regarding the page you've created at Dan Klass: if you don't add any verifiable sources that establish the notability of the subject of the page pretty soon, it will probably be deleted. At the moment, there's not even much serious attempt to establish notability, which would make it a criteria for speedy deletion And sure enough, someone's just tagged it as such -- add a {{hangon}} tag to the page if you want to contest it. -- simxp (talk) 05:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well. I took off the tag and did a little to tidy up the page. I suggest dropping the cute stuff (this is an encyclopedia, not myspace) and establishing notability. Hope you aren't offended by the changes. 203.33.165.251 06:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Klass.jpg

I hate to come back so soon -- some good stuff with the latest edits to Dan Klass, by the way -- but I just wanted to make sure you'd realised that someone's listed Image:Klass.jpg for speedy deletion, because "you indicated that only Wikipedia has permission to use this file. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, since explicit permission to use it was given, this is in fact not the case" (more info at the image page). -- simxp (talk) 07:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Inactive?

I've been totally active, lol. If you go to my user page, and click the link in the "About me" section, it will give you my edit history. Anyway, we're doing a lot of discussing about episodes. If you want to do something for Freddy's Nightmares, I'd suggest working List of Freddy's Nightmares episodes. Look at what I did for List of Smallville episodes, or what I've started for List of The Incredible Hulk episodes. The Smallville one doesn't have little synopsis of the episodes, The Incredible Hulk does (well, the first season does). If you want help I could set the page up for you and just make it a basic table and you can fill all the information in. Unless you're good with HTML. Some people aren't (like myself, but I'm great at analyzing existing HTML and copy/pasting it somewhere else..lol). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, which would you like it set up as? The Smallville list or the "Hulk" list? One has the option of putting in a brief synopsis, and one doesn't. There's an external link for the hulk episodes that gives a description of the episodes, but I don't want to use it because some of them are bare and the webmaster guys seems touchy about using his stuff. If you know what happens in the episodes, feel free to fill them in. I'll do any necessary copy editing (if there is some). If not, it won't do any harm to wait till each season comes out. Season 2 will be out in a month. Anyway, let me know which format you prefer. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been created, just follow the link above. If the main article doesn't grow, based on the small size of the "list of episodes" article, they may end up being merged. 44 episodes really isn't that much. But we'll cross that road when we get to it. I did the Hulk format, because I figured you were going to put in a brief synopsis, if not it's easily correctable. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put 22 per season. I don't remember, but was it evenly split, or should I move some from one season to the next? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Awsometrex

I have no idea. I informed him of the reasons for deletion, he asked me a question, and before I could answer he just flew off the handle. There are no strong feelings on my part, this was a simple and fairly routine deletion of non-notable content. If you could please look over the notability criteria explained at WP:MUSIC before creating any more articles on musicians, I would greatly appreciate it. Cheers, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 12:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Cheney

Please do not insert false information into articles, as you did on Dick Cheney. Your edit could be considered vandalism and is not appropriate. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 18:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Wikimindless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.44.245.148 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Awsometrex". The reason given for Awsometrex's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Merope (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: For violating the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy by hiding behind an alternate account for the purposes of vandalism and making personal attacks against others you have now been blocked from Wikipedia for 1 month. Should you violate this policy again you shall be indefinitely banned. We have zero tolerance for such an abuse of community trust. -- Netsnipe ► 19:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikimindless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My acount of Wikimindless is blocked because of shared Ip address. My use a shared library IP address. Each floor of the library shares a different town IP address. The first and second floor of the building are on a seperate non-state funded IP address, while the top floor is on a different IP NJ state Library IP address. Today, I checked with the librarians, about this. I was working on a page about "Freddy's Nightmares" episodes when the user Merope blocked the entire first and second floors of the library, and today the user Anetode blocked the third floor as I asked for his help because he is an administrator, which he denied because he saw that i was using the state regulated IP address. I noted this two days ago on my user page. One user named Awsometrex uses a computer on the first floor. The Librerians found out he is an 12 year old that has been expelled from school for foul langauge. He has gotten his library card removed. Their are several different Wikipedia users using both of the IP addresses. Only three have accounts: Awsometrex, Wormdoggy and I (Wikimindless). My email address can easily be found on my userpage since June 11th. I do not in no way indorse vandalism of wikipedia in any way. This is has been a huge missunderstanding since most wikipedians use personally laptops of home computers and don't take into account that some people can not afford a computer and only way of internet is the library. All of my "vandalisms" (some consider) have been done in good intention and without perpously vandilising. The Dick Cheney incident was acctually Duane Cheney, which I didn't realize untill later. The user page User: Chario userbox deletion was done because he refused to talk like a civilized man and just insult me. All of my edits I sand by. If you think an of my stuff is "vandalism" do a little reserch on other user talk pages. Any edit can be easily explained, if any questions, you can email me at Wikimindless@yahoo.com

Decline reason:

I, to be honest, do not believe your story. Expelled for foul language? Revoked his library card? — -- tariqabjotu 13:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Re: Fred's Nightmares

No worries. It isn't going anywhere. Matter of fact, I don't think anyone's touched it. I meant to go ahead and fill the basic info out for it, but I've been busy with other stuff. I rewrote the entire Jason Voorhees page and got it to GA status. Got other projects on the move right now as well. Sucks you got blocked. The price one pays for using a public computer, I guess...you get all their misfortunes. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before my edits, After my edits. This is the actual move, although there have been some minor tweaks here and there by myself and couple other editors who I normally work with other other film pages. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know for you. I only remember him/her from what I have links to on my page. I think he was vandalizing pages as soon as he opened an account...he/she might have been an IP address before hand. I don't remember what they did, just that they were blocked for good 11 minutes after creating their account. Chances are, since I have them listed on my page, they were vandalizing my user page. I think they were also making deragatory remarks on other people's pages and then trying to sign the page with my name, in an effort to make people think I said it. That was January, which seems like ages ago to me now. Anyway, it's almost 11:30 here, and I have work in the a.m., so I'll catch ya later. Hope you don't get caught up in any more public computer blocks. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 03:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have fun. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I was wrong about you

File:Resilient-silver.png		The Resilient Barnstar
		For Wikimindless, after all you went through, you still came right back out an kept doing what you do best. Even if user:Anetode will delete it a hour later, sincerely, Wormdoggy 03:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wikimindless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Anetode just blocked me becasue he is mad I talked bad about him. Instead of looking at the facts and having a chat and dealing things out like men. He decides to block me. He already blocked me for a claim of Sock puppets, now a week after I get my account back, he blocks me again. As I said MANY times my IP is a private library IP user:wormdoggy is a librarian who helped me get my account back, after many arguements, he wanted to apologise by giving me a barnstar. User:Anetode's actions are more vengeful then anything. He has been trying to delete every page that I make for any reason he can, instead of talking about what is wrong with the page or try to improve it, he just deletes it. I am not the only one that this has happened to. It is messed up that he can get away doing this just becasue he is an administrator

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Anetode just blocked me becasue he is mad I talked bad about him. Instead of looking at the facts and having a chat and dealing things out like men. He decides to block me. He already blocked me for a claim of Sock puppets, now a week after I get my account back, he blocks me again. As I said MANY times my IP is a private library IP  [[user:wormdoggy]] is a librarian who helped me get my account back, after many arguements, he wanted to apologise by giving me a barnstar. [[User:Anetode]]'s actions are more vengeful then anything. He has been trying to delete every page that I make for any reason he can, instead of talking about what is wrong with the page or try to improve it, he just deletes it. I am not the only one that this has happened to. It is messed up that he can get away doing this just becasue he is an administrator |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Anetode just blocked me becasue he is mad I talked bad about him. Instead of looking at the facts and having a chat and dealing things out like men. He decides to block me. He already blocked me for a claim of Sock puppets, now a week after I get my account back, he blocks me again. As I said MANY times my IP is a private library IP  [[user:wormdoggy]] is a librarian who helped me get my account back, after many arguements, he wanted to apologise by giving me a barnstar. [[User:Anetode]]'s actions are more vengeful then anything. He has been trying to delete every page that I make for any reason he can, instead of talking about what is wrong with the page or try to improve it, he just deletes it. I am not the only one that this has happened to. It is messed up that he can get away doing this just becasue he is an administrator |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Anetode just blocked me becasue he is mad I talked bad about him. Instead of looking at the facts and having a chat and dealing things out like men. He decides to block me. He already blocked me for a claim of Sock puppets, now a week after I get my account back, he blocks me again. As I said MANY times my IP is a private library IP  [[user:wormdoggy]] is a librarian who helped me get my account back, after many arguements, he wanted to apologise by giving me a barnstar. [[User:Anetode]]'s actions are more vengeful then anything. He has been trying to delete every page that I make for any reason he can, instead of talking about what is wrong with the page or try to improve it, he just deletes it. I am not the only one that this has happened to. It is messed up that he can get away doing this just becasue he is an administrator |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

Wikimindless (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

IP address: 85.16.61.59 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Anetode (talk • blocks)
Block message:

still abusing sockpuppets (see User:Wormdoggy), IP adress resolves to Comcast (1 ip per customer acct), no indication of it being a library. have librarian e-mail from an official addressforunbloc

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Wikimindless}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Anetode | 2=<nowiki>still abusing sockpuppets (see User:Wormdoggy), IP adress resolves to Comcast (1 ip per customer acct), no indication of it being a library. have librarian e-mail from an official addressforunbloc</nowiki> | 3=85.16.61.59 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=85.16.61.59 | 2=<nowiki>still abusing sockpuppets (see User:Wormdoggy), IP adress resolves to Comcast (1 ip per customer acct), no indication of it being a library. have librarian e-mail from an official addressforunbloc</nowiki> | 3=Anetode | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=85.16.61.59 | 2=<nowiki>still abusing sockpuppets (see User:Wormdoggy), IP adress resolves to Comcast (1 ip per customer acct), no indication of it being a library. have librarian e-mail from an official addressforunbloc</nowiki> | 3=Anetode | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 |}
-{{unblock|Anetode just blocked me becasue he is mad I talked bad about him. Instead of looking at the facts and having a chat and dealing things out like men. He decides to block me. He already blocked me for a claim of Sock puppets, now a week after I get my account back, he blocks me again. As I said MANY times my IP is a private library IP  {{user:wormdoggy]] is a librarian who helped me get my account back, after many arguements, he wanted to apologise by giving me a barnstar. [[User:Anteode]]'s actions are more vengeful then anything. He has been trying to delete every page that I make for any reason he can, instead of talking about what is wrong with the page or try to improve it, he just deletes it. I am not the only one that this has happened to. It is messed up that he can get away doing this just becasue he is an administrator}}
+{{unblock| Anetode just blocked me becasue he is mad I talked bad about him. Instead of looking at the facts and having a chat and dealing things out like men. He decides to block me. He already blocked me for a claim of Sock puppets, now a week after I get my account back, he blocks me again. As I said MANY times my IP is a private library IP  [[user:wormdoggy]] is a librarian who helped me get my account back, after many arguements, he wanted to apologise by giving me a barnstar. [[User:Anetode]]'s actions are more vengeful then anything. He has been trying to delete every page that I make for any reason he can, instead of talking about what is wrong with the page or try to improve it, he just deletes it. I am not the only one that this has happened to. It is messed up that he can get away doing this just becasue he is an administrator}}
 {{unblock-auto|1=85.16.61.59|2=still abusing sockpuppets (see [[User:Wormdoggy]]), IP adress resolves to Comcast (1 ip per customer acct), no indication of it being a library. have librarian e-mail from an official addressforunbloc|3=Anetode}}